Reading the comments here, I totally agree with her now. She showed how nationalistic and intolerant people still are.

If you get offended by this (even if it's only a little bit), then that's problematic.

You people are thinking too hard. The reality is people kill for virtually any reason, its what we do!

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/man-accused-of-killing-neighbor-over-dog-droppings-in-yard/550639496

Seriously? 

Did you not get the memo we live in a world that's easily offended by essentially everything. People in the media are treated as monsters if they say a racial slur, but nobody is allowed to be offended by a flag getting pissed on? Meh... okay.

Being offensive is actually illegal in some developed countries, could lead to suicide or something.

Well, according to the code of conduct: "The flag should not be used as "wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery", or for covering a speaker's desk, draping a platform, or for any decoration in general (exception for coffins).".

My point is that it's a piece of cloth and it's important that we have the right to even denegrade it, even if it means pissing on it or wearing it. 

And if she'd peed on a picture of Mohammed, I hope people would defend her right to do so aswell, or don't you agree?

Tbh, i agree with her point. It's either freedom or none.
Of course, i found her acts to be very disgusting, but it's still legal nonetheless. I just hope that if tomorrow i masturbate to a PICTURE of a 10 years old little girl and jizz in her PICTURE mouth or burn a nintendo console. I expect people to defend me as well.
I would burn a nintendo console tho.

No edgy.

I don't care what she pee's on (i don't think many people would defend her if she pee'd on Mo), She knew what she was doing she should face the consequences.  Why would i defend a total stranger?

That symbolism is somewhat debatable these days. Anyway, even if we assume it has that symbolic value, it should still be obvious to everyone her intention wasn't to 'piss on freedom of expression' but to show what must be tolerated if freedom of expression is wanted. To see this as a bad thing, you must not be even trying to see the point.

I will defend your right to do that. In the same paragraph, I will also attack you for your poor taste, which is within my freedom of expression. I might also look for a place to tip you as a potential pedophile though, but freedom of expression guarantees your right to what you do.

Have you been reading my posts? Because I've already said I don't care and am not offended by it. I read a comment on how it was stated that the flag could be seen as a symbol of freedom of expression, so I commented on how it's not only ironic that people want her dead over it, but that she symbolically pissed all over her right to do it in the first place.

Have you been reading my posts? I never even hinted that you might care or be offended. I was talking about people in general. I admit there's room for a misunderstanding in the last sentence because f*ck English and its passive, but it was not directed at you. I'm sorry if you took it personally because of my somewhat poor choice of words though. Anyway, as for the last part of your sentence, I direct you back to my previous post: debatable, and even then requires almost deliberately trying to see it as offensive.

She made a political statement. Nothing should be done to her. No Jail. No Death. No Punishment.

Freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of movement, freedom of association, freedom of religion... Means... You need to put up with political statements like this, because... It's Freedom.