It looks like a fine game, I may get it later down the line. But for now, I'm just trying to finish Shadows of Valentia and Pokemon Sun.

I wouldn't trust the metacritic score with this one. Slate and Metro Games Central both gave this an insanely low review score. Both sites are garbage. Slate gave BotW a 6/10, and Metro routinely gives games 6/10 when other sites give them 9/10.

This is why I use Opencritic. It let's me remove unprofessional reviews out from the average. Currently sitting at 81/100 on my own Opencritic score.

Interested yes, but short on time and money. So I'll stick to the demo for the moment.

I don't know why they aren't. Who wants unqualified publications like the New York Times or Time magazine mucking up the average? They just tap their movie critic for those, so you know the evaluation is going to be about as good as your Grandmother's. 

On Topic: I'm still waiting to see what IGN, Nintendolife, and Easy Allies give it. Especially Easy Allies. I'll pick it up monday. 

Metacritic is good enough. That's why a better alternative don't get spread exponential but has a slow growth. If Metacritic was for a reason unusable but the only way, and then a better alternative opens - the migration would be biblical.

Decent score, am interested, but not enough for me to get it

Still haven't beaten FF Explorers, which is a similar style and am not too interested in going for another

Amazon why... I thought we were friends... ;_;