And lost money for the games that the potential buyer didn't get because the system wasn't available. Sure, the buyer can get those games down the road, but by then, the buyer may have acquired the game on a competing console or lost interest in the game entirely. Not to mention the fact that publishers care about early sales of games more than anything. A publisher, Nintendo included, would rather you buy a game at launch than a year later.

Not only that, but why did Nintendo resort to shipment by air for some of its stock a few weeks ago? Shipping by plane is FAR more costly than by boat. That's really all the proof you need that the shortages aren't artificial.

I'm not the norm but I just build a small linrary of games before I have a system for a few months. More people should just do that.

So if Nintendo's lying about shortages, what about Toshiba, and all the other sources citing the scarcity of components like NAND memory? Is it all some vast industry-wide conspiracy to make Switch look popular? That's entering tinfoil hat territory.

Does this methodology you describe eliminate the possibility that Nintendo is just terrible at anticipating demand or perhaps external factors have come into play like a NAND shortage?

A number of outlets are reporting or have reported on NAND shortages:

https://www.kitguru.net/components/matthew-wilson/dram-and-nand-supply-shortage-expected-to-last-until-2018/

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ssd-hdd-shortage-nand-market,33112.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/234565/no-relief-for-dram-and-nand-shortages-in-sight-considerable-supply-only-in-2018

https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/nand-flash-memory-supply-shrinking-ssd-prices-rising/

And Nintendo needs these components to assemble Switch units. They're competing with smart phones:

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/05/31/demand-for-nintendo-switch-leads-to-nintendo-and-apple-battling-for-scarce-parts/

https://www.slashgear.com/apple-is-to-blame-for-your-nintendo-switch-shortage-30486866/

http://bgr.com/2017/05/30/switch-console-and-iphone-8-parts/

So if you're looking to place blame for Switch shortages on a conspiracy theory, please understand that a shortage can have multiple causes. In the Switch's case, a NAND shortage or Nintendo's inability to anticipate runaway demand.

Unless, like Curl-6 stated, Toshiba and smartphone makers are in on the conspiracy too to limit the supply of Nintendo Switch units out on store shelves.

Despite the fact that the question in Truck's OP remains to be a ridiculous one to have to ask, discussion in this thread turned out to be way more intriguing than I previously thought it would. Correct or not.

No, no, no, no, this is logic. We can't use logic here. Would you please leave this thread? Thank you.

So you're trying to say that all or most of nintendo consoles/products' shortages were due to part shortages instead of gigantic incompetence on nintendo's part or that nintendo is using scarcity marketing to sell their products by just looking at the switch? You've got to be kidding me. 

ugh. I'm talking about a common business strategy that alot of businesses use to increase their sales. There's nothing of a conspiracy in anything I'm saying. Some of you are even agreeing with me that nintendo has used this strategy before with other products. I'm just saying that nintendo uses it as much as they can. 

You think Nintendo would ship extra Switch's via airplane (which costs way more) to help demand in the US if they were "purposely creating an artificially scarcity" on them?I don't think so. They wouldn't artificially create shortages to just spend more money sending consoles via air.

But for this particular situation, with what we know in regards to manufacturing parts and assembly lines being bidded and prioritized, its no wonder Nintendo, even if they could, struggle getting more prioritization for parts and assembly lines to produce more Switch units. And Nintendo pretty much was open about how much they were producing for the initial launch (about 2+ million) and were open to manufacturing more if demand increases. Of course, easier said than done right? Considering what happened to the Wii U and Nintendo losing money for a few years, do you blame them for underestimating demand? Also look back on their overall sales history from the GameCube to the Wii then to the Wii U. Not really consistent sales wise. Wii Us were on shelves and were just there...sitting and waiting to be sold, leading to being Nintendo's worst selling home console....EVER! Yes, there were a variety of reasons why that happened, but it happened and it significantly affected Nintendo's bottom line that had to be made up by the comeback of the 3DS, DLC, amiibos, and probably careful stocking of units of their respective consoles. Not as bad as Sony's bottom line when the PS3 struggled out of the gate and was bleeding money, but it was a struggle nonetheless.

Remember, Nintendo had its first loss back in 2012 in decades, which lasted until 2014 or so. Nintendo doesn't want to lose money and have said they don't intend to sell Switch units at a loss. Then your hear the news about Nintendo actually shipping new Switch units by air mail, which is pretty pricey, and the recent news about chips and other parts being scare for a variety of devices being made, which led to the news your hear now about Nintendo and Apple. So I think in this particular situation, I don't think we can assume artificial shortages just because of history, Nintendo's fault or not (and I don't even know much about how those shortages of the past came to be, such as the original NES).