By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - ESO Runs at 4K@30FPS on XB1X with Additional Graphics Fidelity over Pro

DonFerrari on 17 June 2017
ironmanDX said:
WagnerPaiva said:
We get it, all games will looks better on Xbox X.

Come on mate, early this gen every second thread was a digital foundry comparison or something about the power differential between the x1 and the ps4.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, the console hasn't even released yet and it's too much? Not a chance.

With the Switch outselling the ps4 atm too they're really copping some of their own medicine. It's quite good to see

Yes, sure, because Xbox fans here didn't deny the difference.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
Qwark on 17 June 2017
vivster said:
Snoopy said:

I got a Mac.

I have a girlfriend.

I have time to play games



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

cannonballZ on 17 June 2017
Kyuu said:

Those comparisons existed because there were a bunch of Xbox fans denying the difference or blaming it on optimization. It took them a while to finally admit that it wasn't a problem of developers being lazy.

Same thing is starting to happen now though.  Some already say X1X is nothing more than a more expensive ps4 pro. 



SuperBott on 17 June 2017
cannonballZ said:
Kyuu said:

Those comparisons existed because there were a bunch of Xbox fans denying the difference or blaming it on optimization. It took them a while to finally admit that it wasn't a problem of developers being lazy.

Same thing is starting to happen now though.  Some already say X1X is nothing more than a more expensive ps4 pro. 

but the difference is huge 5.5GB RAM vs 9GB RAM.



cannonballZ on 17 June 2017
SuperBott said:
cannonballZ said:

Same thing is starting to happen now though.  Some already say X1X is nothing more than a more expensive ps4 pro. 

but the difference is huge 5.5GB RAM vs 9GB RAM.

Doesn't stop them from claiming otherwise. I find it all funny to be honest. I buy all consoles, the war doesn't exist in my living room.



Around the Network
DonFerrari on 17 June 2017
SuperBott said:
cannonballZ said:

Same thing is starting to happen now though.  Some already say X1X is nothing more than a more expensive ps4 pro. 

but the difference is huge 5.5GB RAM vs 9GB RAM.

Yes, let's wait the difference to really show.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

JRPGfan on 17 June 2017
SuperBott said:
cannonballZ said:

Same thing is starting to happen now though.  Some already say X1X is nothing more than a more expensive ps4 pro. 

but the difference is huge 5.5GB RAM vs 9GB RAM.

PS4pro has 8GB GDDR5 and 1GB DDR3.

5.5GB is how much the normal PS4 has free for games.

I "think" that means the PS4pro has 5.5GB+1GB = 6.5GB for games?



cannonballZ on 17 June 2017
JRPGfan said:

PS4pro has 8GB GDDR5 and 1GB DDR3.

5.5GB is how much the normal PS4 has free for games.

I "think" that means the PS4pro has 5.5GB+1GB = 6.5GB for games?

Incorrect. The additional RAM is for multitasking purposes and opens up an additional .5 gigs of ram for devs for a total of 5.5.

https://www.polygon.com/2016/10/21/13358416/ps4-pro-extra-ram-memory

 

PS4 Pro has 5.5 GB for gaming purposes, PS4 has 5GB.



WagnerPaiva on 17 June 2017
ironmanDX said:
WagnerPaiva said:
We get it, all games will looks better on Xbox X.

Come on mate, early this gen every second thread was a digital foundry comparison or something about the power differential between the x1 and the ps4.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, the console hasn't even released yet and it's too much? Not a chance.

With the Switch outselling the ps4 atm too they're really copping some of their own medicine. It's quite good to see

Ok, I will shut up and pretend to be surprise every single time a game looks better on Xbox X. 



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

DonFerrari on 17 June 2017
WagnerPaiva said:
ironmanDX said:

Come on mate, early this gen every second thread was a digital foundry comparison or something about the power differential between the x1 and the ps4.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, the console hasn't even released yet and it's too much? Not a chance.

With the Switch outselling the ps4 atm too they're really copping some of their own medicine. It's quite good to see

Ok, I will shut up and pretend to be surprise every single time a game looks better on Xbox X. 

The good part is that you can be happier when you are suprised.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."