By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - PS4 Pro Holding back Xbox One X???

SkyerIst_Huiesos said:
Also, what about Crackdown, AC Origins, they are all 30 fps. Papa phil talks too much bullshit

4K Ultra HD was the buzzword of his conference, not 60 fps. He should stop being disingenuous and fanning the console war flames and just say they prioritized 4K.

The XOX cpu is only slightly clocked higher than the PS4 Pro cpu, that measly 0.1-0.2 jigahertz isnt gonna make the difference.



Around the Network
Zekkyou said:
While there will likley be instances where parity policies hold the X back (just as they occasionally did the PS4), i doubt that's the case for Destiny 2. They claimed the reason for no 60fps on the Pro was its CPU, and the X's CPU is only mildly less shit.

Which games were held back by parity? You'll probably say AC Unity, but Syndicate had parity with Sony marketing the next year. Other games like The Witcher 3, had higher resolutions on PS4 even with a MS marketing deal. Which games did the XB1 legitimately hold back the PS4?



Bruh Gears of War 4 campaign is 30fps on Xbox One X lol and thats first party OP....nearly every non indie game was 30 fps even First party



Preston Scott

Turkish said:
SkyerIst_Huiesos said:
Also, what about Crackdown, AC Origins, they are all 30 fps. Papa phil talks too much bullshit

4K Ultra HD was the buzzword of his conference, not 60 fps. He should stop being disingenuous and fanning the console war flames and just say they prioritized 4K.

The XOX cpu is only slightly clocked higher than the PS4 Pro cpu, that measly 0.1-0.2 jigahertz isnt gonna make the difference.

Yep. XOX cpu is only 8% faster than Pro's CPU (because actually Pro cpu is clocked at 2.13ghz, not the rounded 2.1ghz number).

It's actually less than PS4 and XB1 CPUs difference, XB1 CPU is around 9.5% faster than PS4 CPU.



The promise of 4k is holding back the xonex.
Imagine if they could use the extra power for more graphics instead of 4k?
Well, I know they couldn't, because the games must run on regular xone(the true hold backer), but I really would like to know where this hardware could go...



Around the Network

No. It's not 60fps on the XBOX because you guys kept with the same Jaguar cores Sony did. Is he going to say this for EVERY game not 60fps on the X?



That doesn't explain Xbox partnership third parties running at 30fps.

Stop talking crap Phil.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

What's holding it back, besides high pricepoint is the same thing that is holding the pro back, it's weak CPU.



Gamers are holding the XBox One X back. Graphics is still the number 1 priority for new game purchases. The current gen consoles have no problem running at 60fps, psvr says hi. Polybius even does 120fps on base ps4. It has to look pretty to sell though :/

A cpu better suited to the gpu would help too of course. All these claims of balanced hardware are just empty talk.



So the XB1 doesn't exist anymore? isn't it still the weakest sku of the hd twins?

And did everyone else just conveniently forget that the XBX CPU isn't even up to 10% faster than that of the Pro?