Quantcast
Xenoblade Chronicles 2 - Official Game Trailer - Nintendo E3 2017

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Xenoblade Chronicles 2 - Official Game Trailer - Nintendo E3 2017

I feel sorry for those that only judge a game by its graphics wich I can clearly see in this thread.
Iet's your loss after all, if this game is even half as good as XB1 I'm will be one happy mother f**ker.



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

Around the Network
Anfebious said:
bigtakilla said:

Because it's retreading, and instead of offering more (or hell even the same) it's essentially offering less (no armor customization). When the greatest thing about it is it is basically on a slightly more powerful system (the whole its objectively better thing you were talking about which I mean c'mon we giving brownie points for that), and doesn't expand on the ideas of its predecesors, its kind of a letdown.

I think the issue you have with this game is that it isn't a XCX sequel. It's a sequel to the first game it's expanding on that game. Personally I feel extremely relieved because XCX was lame.

I loved both games, so not sure why that would be an issue. Though you are missing entirely what was stated above about how it is missing things even the first game provided to its players, not really sure how it's "expanding on the first game" either? At least not to the same degree XCX did.



Anfebious said:
bigtakilla said:

Because it's retreading, and instead of offering more (or hell even the same) it's essentially offering less (no armor customization). When the greatest thing about it is it is basically on a slightly more powerful system (the whole its objectively better thing you were talking about which I mean c'mon we giving brownie points for that), and doesn't expand on the ideas of its predecesors, its kind of a letdown.

I think the issue you have with this game is that it isn't a XCX sequel. It's a sequel to the first game it's expanding on that game. Personally I feel extremely relieved because XCX was lame.

I loved both games, so not sure why that would be an issue. Though you are missing entirely what was stated above about how it is missing things even the first game provided to its players, not really sure how it's "expanding on the first game" either? At least not to the same degree XCX did.



I feel sorry for those that only judge a game by its graphics wich I can clearly see in this thread.
Iet's your loss after all, if this game is even half as good as XB1 I'm will be one happy mother f**ker.



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

Naum said:
I feel sorry for those that only judge a game by its graphics wich I can clearly see in this thread.
Iet's your loss after all, if this game is even half as good as XB1 I'm will be one happy mother f**ker.

I have no doubt it'll be at least half as good. Shame they didn't go for more though.



Around the Network
Volterra_90 said:
RolStoppable said:

All of that is only your opinion.

Everything that can be measured objectively seems to be better in XC2.

Agreed. We can't talk about plot as for now, but the individual areas seem bigger, the combat is refined and improved, the game looks better... I don't find, as for now, any single measurable reason why this can't be better than the first one. And not a single reason why this game doesn't deserve the Xenoblade name.

How exactly is combat refined and improved? The game looks better sure, but in that "Call Of Duty Ghosts" next gen kind of way (they even said in the Treehouse the engine and assets are taken directly from X).



bigtakilla said:
Anfebious said:

I think the issue you have with this game is that it isn't a XCX sequel. It's a sequel to the first game it's expanding on that game. Personally I feel extremely relieved because XCX was lame.

I loved both games, so not sure why that would be an issue. Though you are missing entirely what was stated above about how it is missing things even the first game provided to its players, not really sure how it's "expanding on the first game" either? At least not to the same degree XCX did.

I don't see what's missing from the first game. 

It's expanding an already perfect formula. Bigger enviroments and a few tweaks on the battle system.

 



"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"

bigtakilla said:
IkePoR said:

Wow what?  Are you sure?

From what I seen in the treehouse, and the two trailers that is what is shown. Now, could it and they just didn't showcase it for whatever reason, yes.

We didn't see armour custimization in the original game until later on as well you're going to need to provide a source on this one other than your assumption.



Wyrdness said:
bigtakilla said:

From what I seen in the treehouse, and the two trailers that is what is shown. Now, could it and they just didn't showcase it for whatever reason, yes.

We didn't see armour custimization in the original game until later on as well you're going to need to provide a source on this one other than your assumption.

Which would go back to my statement of not showcasing what makes this better, or even on the same level as other games. But if there IS a source that says there will be customization please share.



Anyone yet point out that the Treehouse footage had English text with Japanese Audio?

Are we getting a worldwide release with dual audio?



Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda!!!!