By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Predict Arms' Metascore

Azuren on 06 June 2017
Einsam_Delphin said:
Azuren said:

Are you drunk? Because it's a game where you play from behind a character focused on an opposing character, trying to knock them out in a boxing match.

Holy fuck, dude, what part of "Not discussing anything with you" are you not understanding?

 

You didn't acknowledge it of course but I know you read me explaining ARMS gameplay, none of which applys to Punch-Out. Just because they have the same perspective and end goal does not mean they play the same. But I'm sure you know all this and are just being nonsensical as a defense mechanism instead of simply admitting to your folly. It's really not that hard to admit you don't know much about ARMS but judged it anyway, nor is it difficult to accept that people can like things you may not like and find boring.

Yes Goodnightmoon should not have jumped in especially since he's known to do the same thing you are currently, though if you really don't want to discuss something you should do just that and stop responding instead of expecting the one you're arguing with to stop first.

I just don't know how to talk to you if you're not going to admit the similarities between Arms and Punch-Out. I'd spent roughly 30 minutes watching a stream of it prior, and went back to watch more just in case my memory was flubbing it. It's Punch-Out with a twist (pun intended). Yes, there arte additional game modes (including crap like volleyball), but it's still the same basic premise.  If you don't want to see that, then I don't think this conversation is going to go anywhere.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Around the Network
Lonely_Dolphin on 06 June 2017
Azuren said:

I just don't know how to talk to you if you're not going to admit the similarities between Arms and Punch-Out. I'd spent roughly 30 minutes watching a stream of it prior, and went back to watch more just in case my memory was flubbing it. It's Punch-Out with a twist (pun intended). Yes, there arte additional game modes (including crap like volleyball), but it's still the same basic premise.  If you don't want to see that, then I don't think this conversation is going to go anywhere.

Okay sure fine whatever, same basic premise, now what does that have to do with anything? How you want to summarize the game certainly doesn't change the fact that ARMS has plenty of depth.



Azuren on 06 June 2017
Einsam_Delphin said:
Azuren said:

I just don't know how to talk to you if you're not going to admit the similarities between Arms and Punch-Out. I'd spent roughly 30 minutes watching a stream of it prior, and went back to watch more just in case my memory was flubbing it. It's Punch-Out with a twist (pun intended). Yes, there arte additional game modes (including crap like volleyball), but it's still the same basic premise.  If you don't want to see that, then I don't think this conversation is going to go anywhere.

Okay sure fine whatever, same basic premise, now what does that have to do with anything? How you want to summarize the game certainly doesn't change the fact that ARMS has plenty of depth.

I would argue that it has the bare minimum of depth to justify a $20 purchase.

 

But hey, fuck me, right? I also think that Overwatch should be $10.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Azuren on 06 June 2017
Goodnightmoon said:
Einsam_Delphin said:

 

You didn't acknowledge it of course but I know you read me explaining ARMS gameplay, none of which applys to Punch-Out. Just because they have the same perspective and end goal does not mean they play the same. But I'm sure you know all this and are just being nonsensical as a defense mechanism instead of simply admitting to your folly. It's really not that hard to admit you don't know much about ARMS but judged it anyway, nor is it difficult to accept that people can like things you may not like and find boring.

Yes Goodnightmoon should not have jumped in especially since he's known to do the same thing you are currently, though if you really don't want to discuss something you should do just that and stop responding instead of expecting the one you're arguing with to stop first.

I'm tired of you too and your shitty baseless coments. I don't go posting dumbs "I'm ignoring you" pics when I have no argument to answer neither I become nonsensical as a defense mechanism, stop getting things out of your ass as usual.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Lonely_Dolphin on 06 June 2017
Azuren said:

I would argue that it has the bare minimum of depth to justify a $20 purchase.

But hey, fuck me, right? I also think that Overwatch should be $10.

Then argue it! Please I'd love to see you try! Even if not though, the bolded is you finally admitting you were wrong about the game having no depth. See? Wasn't so hard was it!

So how do you explain Overwatch's score given that it's not a Nintendo game? This should be good to hear!



Around the Network
Cubedramirez on 06 June 2017

over under is 76



Ryugarr on 06 June 2017

I am going to go with 87. Will most of the reviews be up tonight after midnight?



KLXVER on 06 June 2017

Ill go with a 72.



RodrigoCard on 06 June 2017

83



Lonely_Dolphin on 06 June 2017

Guess I'll throw up a prediction of 88! They'll dock points for only 10 characters to start with, the Arm Getter being random, some of the modes not holding up well by themselves, lack of cutscenes in Grand Prix mode, unclear/undetailed explanations for abilitys n effects, how slow it is getting money, etc. None of these are that significant by themselves but combined I see a number of points being docked by some.

However the game will be praised for it's easily accessible yet deep n unique gameplay, it's top notch presentation, rock solid performance both in framerate and online stability, wide variety of modes stages and arms, the colorful cast of characters, and some will probably even compliment the motion controls for actually working well enough. I think all of this should guarantee an 8 at the very least from most reviewers, but we'll see tomorrow!