By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - How much does the round earth lobby pay you?

Global warming is a lie because we actually have flat-earth warming and it can be solved by moving all the people and animals to the edge of one side and all that weight should tip the opposite edge high up into the air thus cooling it off and then repeat it by moving to the opposite edge , also all garbage should be dumped over the edge.

This global nonsense is why we can't have nice things, an example being , with the belief in a flat earth the game of football with the ball being solely responsible for it's popularity because it's shape is seen as a symbol of a the round earth society would give way to frisbee. the true game of the masses.
btw my payment was postmarked to the edge of the world and I'm heading there to collect it but having trouble with how far I have to go.



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot

Around the Network
pearljammer said:
Aeolus451 said:

Again, I didn't ask and I'm not mad. I prefer to use terms everyday people are familiar with so there's little to no misundering or I just elaborate if I can do it quickly. The easiest way is just say I'm an atheist but I'm open to the idea of gods. You're just being a bit pretentious in trying to label me when I didn't ask to be. 

Is there not irony in you objecting to be labeled by others but resisting others' right to label their gender? It struck me as inconsistant. I could be wrong, though. Perhaps you only think gender isn't socially negotiated, as well as psychologically and biologically infulenced but would agree to use the gender label(s) one identifies with. 

As to the greater topic at hand: I'd be cautious in claiming that science is with either political leaning. Many people who subscribe to a plethora of political stances hold positions not based in reason, rationale, or data. Whether it's sects of the right with climate change, evolution, and, well, social sciences as a whole, or parts of the left with GMOs and vaccinations, it's evident not all people of any political persuasion exclusively adhere to scientific findings.

Well, someone assumed I was religious and I replied that I wasn't then some of them tried to school me on how I wasn't religious when I didn't ask to. I don't know why they kept bringing it up. The main thing is I'm trying to not get pulled into anymore off topics but the rabbit hole is just getting deeper. I'll leave this as my last reply to this sort of stufff. I'm willing to use their preferred gender labels as long as they are passable (at least making an obvious effort to appear as the gender they want or I'm made aware of their preferred pronouns and as long as they are polite. To me, using their labels is a courtesy or being polite. I'm not obligated to remain polite if they aren't.

I also don't think a person can be a male one day and a girl the next day then later on in the week back again. So I'll just address them as they appear. With non-binary trans, it's situational but for the most part, I won't use their preferred labels. I'm not gonna call them a zer or something they made up because it's getting to the point of being absurd.  There's limits to what I'm gonna play along with. Anyone can believe anything they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone or force others to believe in it too or to act a different way. You can think yourself as a dragon for all care but I'm not gonna address you as one. 



the-pi-guy said:
Lafiel said:yea, it's very slowly decelrating, 600m years ago a complete rotation took 21h

Even a constant rotation is an acceleration by itself.

Are you referring to centripetal acceleration (v^2/r)? 



fordy said:
$3.1415

*$3.1415926535897



Teeqoz said:
Aeolus451 said:

No. I'm open to the idea of a god or gods but I don't believe they exist.

That means you are an agnostic atheist (a/gnostiscism relating to if you are sure, regardless of if you believe or don't believe, and a/theism relating to if you believe or not).

With that definition, any reasonable person agnostic.

I wouldn't call myself agnostic, because I think that it's extremely unlikely that God exists.

I mean, it's also possible that there is a giant blue rabbit floating around in space, but I doubt it.



Around the Network
the-pi-guy said:
Insidb said:

Are you referring to centripetal acceleration (v^2/r)? 

Yes.

An acceleration is any change in speed or direction.

I know, but there's a mechanical departure from linear acceleration that seems lost on flat earthers.

Since centripetal acceleration is directed towards the center of of the axis of rotation, we're fine, but they always...seem...to omit that...




SpokenTruth said:
numberwang said:
The earth is exactly in the center of the universe.

The center of an Earth referenced observable universe, yes.

I believe only cov = fe² will clarify these things.



SpokenTruth said:

Forum hiccup.  Double posted. 

Better than a forum shart!