Quantcast
How much does the round earth lobby pay you?

Forums - General Discussion - How much does the round earth lobby pay you?

Aeolus451 said:
SpokenTruth said:

The common term for that stance is agnostic.

No. I'm open to the idea of a god or gods but I don't believe they exist.

That means you are an agnostic atheist (a/gnostiscism relating to if you are sure, regardless of if you believe or don't believe, and a/theism relating to if you believe or not).



Around the Network
Goodnightmoon said:
SpokenTruth said:

Neither do agnostics.  They believe it's possible for a god/s to exist but that we likely cannot ever prove it one way or the other.

Which seems like the most reasonable pov

But its the cowards way out. I mean if any human uses logic we would know that it is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of God since we work and live in the universe and follow its physical laws while God if He exists would be the creator of said laws. It would be like characters in games trying to figure out if they are digital simulations it is impossible we cannot even begin to perceive how God would be if He exists. I feel like choosing one or the other is better than the "I don't know" approach. I mean you are already living like atheists so call yourselves that own IP to it don't hide behind the curtain of agnostic.



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

SpokenTruth said:
Aeolus451 said:

Maybe not millions but definitely hundreds or thousands of genders the left is trying to push. 

Didn't canada pass some law forcing everyone to use the correct pronoun for 70 different genders and if you use the wrong pronoun, you can be fined and possibly jailed?  

I'm fine with transgendered people if they conform within binary genders but there's limts to my toleration of the absurdity of their claims and forcing me to play along. At what point is a person just in lala land? At what point do you stop taking someone seriously? There's people who want to be trans racial and others who want to be treated as a dragon or a cat, I shit you not.

You sound like you are confusing gender and sex.  Science only recognizes a few sexes but dozens of genders.

Biologically, there are 6 sexual chromosomal combinations. Anatomically, there are 4 physical combinations.  As for gender, that's a psychological factor that works similar to a slide scale.

So don't calim the left ignores the science when the science backs up the left, not the right.

No, I'm not. I just disagree with ya. Gender is not fluid or on a scale.



Teeqoz said:
Aeolus451 said:

No. I'm open to the idea of a god or gods but I don't believe they exist.

That means you are an agnostic atheist (a/gnostiscism relating to if you are sure, regardless of if you believe or don't believe, and a/theism relating to if you believe or not).

Did I ask you to find out a label for me? No. 



Aeolus451 said:
Teeqoz said:

That means you are an agnostic atheist (a/gnostiscism relating to if you are sure, regardless of if you believe or don't believe, and a/theism relating to if you believe or not).

Did I ask you to find out a label for me? No. 

Hey, no need to get mad. I didn't do anything rude, I just pointed out what the technical term for your stance on religion was. Most people aren't aware of what the terms agnostic and atheist actually imply (I wasn't either until sometime last year), and I don't see the harm in informing people. Even though I replied to you it doesn't mean you are the only one reading it, it's a public thread in a public forum, maybe someone else found my post useful, and it certainly wasn't offensive in any way.



Around the Network
Teeqoz said:
Aeolus451 said:

Did I ask you to find out a label for me? No. 

Hey, no need to get mad. I didn't do anything rude, I just pointed out what the technical term for your stance on religion was. Most people aren't aware of what the terms agnostic and atheist actually imply (I wasn't either until sometime last year), and I don't see the harm in informing people. Even though I replied to you it doesn't mean you are the only one reading it, it's a public thread in a public forum, maybe someone else found my post useful, and it certainly wasn't offensive in any way.

Again, I didn't ask and I'm not mad. I prefer to use terms everyday people are familiar with so there's little to no misundering or I just elaborate if I can do it quickly. The easiest way is just say I'm an atheist but I'm open to the idea of gods. You're just being a bit pretentious in trying to label me when I didn't ask to be. 



Aeolus451 said:
Teeqoz said:

Hey, no need to get mad. I didn't do anything rude, I just pointed out what the technical term for your stance on religion was. Most people aren't aware of what the terms agnostic and atheist actually imply (I wasn't either until sometime last year), and I don't see the harm in informing people. Even though I replied to you it doesn't mean you are the only one reading it, it's a public thread in a public forum, maybe someone else found my post useful, and it certainly wasn't offensive in any way.

Again, I didn't ask and I'm not mad. I prefer to use terms everyday people are familiar with so there's little to no misundering or I just elaborate if I can do it quickly. The easiest way is just say I'm an atheist but I'm open to the idea of gods. You're just being a bit pretentious in trying to label me when I didn't ask to be. 

Haha okay then, sorry for being pretentious and trying to label you.



We are all Martians!



$2.08? Damn! You're getting ripped off. I got at least $2.26



How did you guys manage to change this to talking about god?