By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Antifa Protestor Arrested for Brutally Attacking Trump Supporters with Bicycle Lock

Meanwhile right wing fascists are actually *killing* people ... the guy who stabbed two people to death just this past week for coming to the defence of two Muslim women he was harassing on a train.

The Alt-Right asswipe who killed a black military member for being black the week prior.

Several people who killed Indian Sikhs after Trump's election, being too ignorant to realize they weren't actually Muslims, but they killed them anyway.

Has Trump addressed these incidents ever? The media has not covered them much either, and this is full blown murder. 



Around the Network
Lafiel said:
Aeolus451 said:

Voting for Hillary because she's a woman is just as sexist as voting against her because she's a woman.

voting with the mindset "hey, we gave 44 men a chance, why not try a woman this time?" is just as sexist as "a woman should never be able to lead our country, their gender is not ment/able to lead" ?

Voting for a woman just because she's a woman is sexist.  It's no different than voting for a guy because he's a guy. 

You should only be voting for someone because of their qualifications and what they could possibly do for the country. Their sex has jack shit to do with if they'll do a good job or not. It does not matter if they are a "first" or not. 



Aeolus451 said:
Lafiel said:

voting with the mindset "hey, we gave 44 men a chance, why not try a woman this time?" is just as sexist as "a woman should never be able to lead our country, their gender is not ment/able to lead" ?

Voting for a woman just because she's a woman is sexist.  It's no different than voting for a guy because he's a guy. 

You should only be voting for someone because of their qualifications and what they could possibly do for the country. Their sex has jack shit to do with if they'll do a good job or not. It does not matter if they are a "first" or not. 

To my knowledge Trump has no qualifications besides being over the age of 35 and USA citizen.



sethnintendo said:
Aeolus451 said:

Voting for a woman just because she's a woman is sexist.  It's no different than voting for a guy because he's a guy. 

You should only be voting for someone because of their qualifications and what they could possibly do for the country. Their sex has jack shit to do with if they'll do a good job or not. It does not matter if they are a "first" or not. 

To my knowledge Trump has no qualifications besides being over the age of 35 and USA citizen.

In your opinion.



A university professor? Why am I not at all surprised...



Made a bet with LipeJJ and HylianYoshi that the XB1 will reach 30 million before Wii U reaches 15 million. Loser has to get avatar picked by winner for 6 months (or if I lose, either 6 months avatar control for both Lipe and Hylian, or my patrick avatar comes back forever).

Around the Network
Lafiel said:
Aeolus451 said:

Voting for Hillary because she's a woman is just as sexist as voting against her because she's a woman.

voting with the mindset "hey, we gave 44 men a chance, why not try a woman this time?" is just as sexist as "a woman should never be able to lead our country, their gender is not ment/able to lead" ?

Yes because the sole argument is gender and there is no corelation between ability to lead and gender. If you need prove just look at Germany, South Korea, Brasil or Great Britain. All had great and bad leaders some where male some where female. Not all woman leaders where great (Brasil president and Park from south Korea), while Tatcher, May and Merkel are very good leaders. As for ghe male department whole you can figure those out yourself.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

barneystinson69 said:

A university professor? Why am I not at all surprised...

He used to work for Diablo Valley College in California!!!  That is the epicenter of devil worshipping satanist movement that is aimed at overthrowing our orange saviour thus prophesied in the book of Two Corinthians.



 

Soundwave said:

Meanwhile right wing fascists are actually *killing* people ... the guy who stabbed two people to death just this past week for coming to the defence of two Muslim women he was harassing on a train.

The Alt-Right asswipe who killed a black military member for being black the week prior.

Several people who killed Indian Sikhs after Trump's election, being too ignorant to realize they weren't actually Muslims, but they killed them anyway.

Has Trump addressed these incidents ever? The media has not covered them much either, and this is full blown murder. 

Fascists/alt right morons are literally modern day nazis...heck, even the dude who stabbed two people was shouting out pro-nazi statements and slurs. 

These idiots cry about SJW's and constantly mention 1984, but they're too dense to realize they are supporting a world where one group is superior and has power over others. You won't see the alt right mention the fact that the only way they can gain supporters is through violence and brainwashing. 

 

When a white person does something, they automatically bring excuses or use the false-flag excuse, but they're perfectly fine with bashing blacks and muslims if one person commits something terrible.



Aeolus451 said:
Lafiel said:

voting with the mindset "hey, we gave 44 men a chance, why not try a woman this time?" is just as sexist as "a woman should never be able to lead our country, their gender is not ment/able to lead" ?

Voting for a woman just because she's a woman is sexist.  It's no different than voting for a guy because he's a guy. 

You should only be voting for someone because of their qualifications and what they could possibly do for the country. Their sex has jack shit to do with if they'll do a good job or not. It does not matter if they are a "first" or not. 

Look, you responded to the mindset "the female gender should not have power" with "voting for a woman because she is a woman is just as sexist", meaning they are of the exact same quality. And that's where I disagree, because the later can have a lot of different reasons (and one example I gave: current/historical underrepresentation > imo arguably an egalitarian vote if qualifications/policies/etc are equal) . "Voting for a man because he is a man" can have a lot of different reasons aswell and imo not all of them are sexist, but voting against a woman for the one and only reason that "their gender is incapable" has no room for discussion, it's grave sexism.

Anyway, I'm moving on from your false equivalencies, especially as it's not even slightly related to the topic.

 

@ topic ) I don't know the situation in the USA, but here in Germany a big part of the "Antifa" is not there for policies or ideology, they are just extremely eager to punch/hurt people, their believes are extremely superficial/hypocritical and not few mostly use the movement to feel justified in their lust for violence.

I hope the victims enjoy a quick recovery (and won't be ruined by exorbitant hospital/medicine bills) and the perpetrator/s get their just sentence.



barneystinson69 said:

A university professor? Why am I not at all surprised...

Are university professors [in]famous for attacking people or why is that not surprising?