By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Donald Trump's Financial Ties to Russian Oligarchs Exposed Documentary 2017

Aeolus451 said:
Clickbait.

How so? The majority of the points in the video have documented evidence. 



Around the Network
Insidb said:
numberwang said:

Can someone name that elusive Russian mobster and give a specific crime that occurred?

If you google it, his name comes up frequently: he was also nabbed by the FBI for pump-and-dump schemes.

Can you tell me his name, his crimes and the nature of his financial "ties" to Trump? I do not want to watch a 90min video nor dig through the dumpster of google.



monocle_layton said:
I find it disgusting how the altright constantly mentioned Hillary's emails and demanded 24/7 investigations on her, and yet push away any sort of demands to investigate Trump with terrible excuses. What, are they scared the Dump is nothing more than another elite scumbag who's here to steal from the people for the corporations?

His investigation is coming. Comey just released a memo from Trump asking him to back off Flynn investigation. He'll dig his own grave no doubt. 



FIT_Gamer said:
monocle_layton said:
I find it disgusting how the altright constantly mentioned Hillary's emails and demanded 24/7 investigations on her, and yet push away any sort of demands to investigate Drumpf with terrible excuses. What, are they scared the Dump is nothing more than another elite scumbag who's here to steal from the people for the corporations?

His investigation is coming. Comey just released a memo from Drumpf asking him to back off Flynn investigation. He'll dig his own grave no doubt. 

Did Comey actually release the memo?  I read that there were claims that such a memo existed.  If it's true, and the memo is actually released, I'm not sure how that could possibly not be an impeachable, if not treasonous, offense.



FIT_Gamer said:
Aeolus451 said:
Clickbait.

How so? The majority of the points in the video have documented evidence. 

It's not in any of the news (mainstream or alternative). Most likely the things in it are sketchy, come from sketchy people or just unsubstantial info otherwise any news related group would be all over it. This stuff is no different than the birther stuff about obama. 



Around the Network
Aeolus451 said:
FIT_Gamer said:

How so? The majority of the points in the video have documented evidence. 

It's not in any of the news (mainstream or alternative). Most likely the things in it are sketchy, come from sketchy people or just unsubstantial info otherwise any news related group would be all over it. This stuff is no different than the birther stuff about obama. 

So what you're saying is you didn't watch it. So again how is it click bait?



I wasted my time watching the first ten minutes... if you make a drinking game for every "maybe", "could be", "potentially" "allegedly" you'll be drunk like Yeltsin.

No evidence, just talking heads with drivel trying to sway the feeble minded.



numberwang said:
I wasted my time watching the first ten minutes... if you make a drinking game for every "maybe", "could be", "potentially" "allegedly" you'll be drunk like Yeltsin.

No evidence, just talking heads with drivel trying to sway the feeble minded.

If you only watched the first 10 minutes you didn't even get passed the introduction. Start at around the 24 minute mark. 



FIT_Gamer said:
Aeolus451 said:

It's not in any of the news (mainstream or alternative). Most likely the things in it are sketchy, come from sketchy people or just unsubstantial info otherwise any news related group would be all over it. This stuff is no different than the birther stuff about obama. 

So what you're saying is you didn't watch it. So again how is it click bait?

Asking people to watch an 80-minute video just to be able to discuss its credibility is just stupid. That's kind of like saying you can't say drugs are bad without trying them first. You can make fairly reasonable assumptions about a video like this even without watching it. They might not be correct, but there's a good chance they are.



Zkuq said:
FIT_Gamer said:

So what you're saying is you didn't watch it. So again how is it click bait?

Asking people to watch an 80-minute video just to be able to discuss its credibility is just stupid. That's kind of like saying you can't say drugs are bad without trying them first. You can make fairly reasonable assumptions about a video like this even without watching it. They might not be correct, but there's a good chance they are.

It's actually nothing even remotely like that. How can he claim the content of something is "clickbait" when you don't even know what the content is?