How can you say their discussion was not sensible? Do you know what he told them? Do any of us? Hell, do the supposed leakers know what was said? The only people who know are the people who were in the oval office at that time. And so far all of them have said, on the record, nothing out of line was discussed.

And the Israelis, where this intelligence is supposed to have come from have, as of this am, stated they aren't worried about what was discussed. 

Also, you might want to get yourself a tin foil hat...

LOL, watch the news much?

This is actually the problem right now. People are too bothered to hear it live. They will await for the spin from whatever media outlet they listen to. During the election I watched every speach in its entirty and watche dthe various news outlets afterwards, CNN spun the hell out of anything and everything Trump said to fit there agenda.  Surprisingly enough Fox was the most even in regards to both candidates, probably because they didnt really care for Trump either.

Neglecting their responsibility doesn't absolve them from it.

It's well known that American tv media is dogshit.

Except they are not... 

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2017/05/16/breaking-israels-statement-trump-leaking-intel-russia/

And straight from the horse's mouth... 

http://www.timesofisrael.com/defense-minister-israel-us-security-ties-strong-as-ever/

Well, given states often say otherwise, yes. Because unlike many things, you can actually say this happened and represents their main view. What the individuals think is not up to them. They are an organization. If the main line is to maintain course, so be it. 

Check another link, because I didn't mention a Western media outlet in there... 

So what's your point here? That Isreal is pissed but they can't tell us but you and the media are in the know? If they said they aren't pissed than it's done move on. Don't let your hate for Trump lead you down illogical thinking like this. I'd also reccomened taking anything the media says about Trump with a grain of salt. Right now Trump is really really good for buinsess with it comes to the medialate night talk show host. That's why it's all they talk about now. So they will sensationalize things in their headlines to aid in getting the clicks.

I'm not even expecting a written article, basically I just want a transcript or at least some of the key points in a written form, word to word. I can't skim through a video to get to the point but I can skim through a transcript. If I really wanted to understand everything important that's going on, it'd take way too much time if I had to watch a video for every single thing there's a video for. Quite frankly, that's also one part of media's job: Focusing on the important parts so everyone doesn't have to spend a lot of time on staying up-to-date.

Hmm... Two unauthorized officers at the Intelligence Agency and a former official of their Military Intelligence Service... Yeah, that's really representative. The ambassador and the actual Chief of the service don't seem to be important... 

Yes and then you were given much more reliable sources and started trying to downplay them. I'm positive that if these people said what you wanted to hear there would be no down playing of that they said. This is the problem people only believe what they want to hear. Anything else they twist and make sense of in their own way.