By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - The Dark Tower - The Motion Picture

Chris Hu said:
Not really interested in it. But I do look forward to the next Stephen King movie directed by Frank Darabont he has the rights to The Long Walk and The Monkey. I liked all his previous movies based on King stories, The Green Mile, The Mist and The Shawshank Redemption.

Interesting .  i never saw The Mist (didn't remember it being that strong a story).  Shawshank is one of my all time favorites and The Green Mile was good.  Typically movies based off of King's novels suck (with a few exceptions). 



Around the Network
pokoko said:
I read ... three books, I think, before I quit. I just didn't care about the characters and there were long stretches where I felt nothing but boredom. I'm just not a fan of King's novels, which feel like they're over-inflated with hot air. I like his short stories a lot more.

So much this.

Alot of it is just unnessary detail. Like pages worth of it sometimes, when what you actually want is the story telling to get on with it, you want action.

Steven King takes it to the extreme sometimes, and it actually ends up makeing his books less fun to read.



A_C_E said:

How do you know this is a sequel? Jake is meeting the Gunslinger in the trailer and seems to happen upon the Gunslinger in a very different way than the novel. Jake was hit by a car and killed and was portaled to the Gunslingers realm. I also notice the library in NY City where Roland, Jake and Eddie were looking for, you know... My point is, I don't see how the studio could claim this is a sequel when it contains - judging from the trailer alone - many of the events that happened in the first four books.

I'm a HUGE fan of the novels and I realize that no movie can be outright true to the novel. I'm interested in the movie and think the trailer stands on its own, but I already disagree with a few things. They should have just done the TV series and then movie, then back to TV series like originally planned, not this condensed nonsense.

http://collider.com/the-dark-tower-sequel/

Arcel confirmed as much in EW’s report:

“The hardcore fans of The Dark Tower series will know that this is actually a sequel to the books in a way. It has a lot of the same elements, a lot of the same characters, but it is a different journey.”

Arcel also commented on the circular nature of the story as a way to take book readers at its end back to its beginning in the first film:

“It’s completely circular, cogs and wheels. Everything fits together. It has a great little power to it. It fits very well into the nature of the entire saga itself.”



TallSilhouette said:
Nymeria said:

 This, along with Blade Runner 2049, are the two movies I am most nervous about this year.

Villeneuve, Deakins, Fancher, Johannsson, Ford, and Gosling not inspiring enough confidence for you? I know Hollywood sequels have a notorious track record, but this one seems to have as good a chance as any.

That is actually what makes me nervous, everything is set up for it to be another classic.  If I knew it would be garbage I'd just ignore it, but that talent could mean great things for one of my favorite movies.  The more I want something to be great, the mor enerovus I get.



Being a massive Dark Tower series fan I am coming into this movie with Ultra-Low expectation. The story is just too complex and detailed to ever even have the smallest hope of being well done in movie format without turning it into a trilogy with 3+ hours on each movie, and this is at bare minimum.

After seeing the trailers I am both very disappointed and impressed with the direction of the film. I am disappointed by how they are trying to turn it into a Sci-Fi action film that literally takes place, in part, on other worlds and not other dimensions/timelines that the books take place in. I am heavily disappointed at how they show Roland having supernatural speed and pre-made revolver bullet clips and what seems to be an unlimited supply of munitions including both loose bullets and revolver clips. I am impressed, however, with how the casting of the characters and how, at least in the short clips, the personalities of the characters are true to the books.

This story is neither a sequel, nor a prequel, and is certainly not canon to the books either. The Dark Tower movie, IMHO, is best described as a Roland and Jake story based loosely on the Dark Tower Series world and events.

 

The writer and directors has forgotten the face of their father.



Around the Network

I read a little of the books but I grew bored of it quickly. The movie by itself looks good.



Nymeria said:

http://collider.com/the-dark-tower-sequel/

Arcel confirmed as much in EW’s report:

“The hardcore fans of The Dark Tower series will know that this is actually a sequel to the books in a way. It has a lot of the same elements, a lot of the same characters, but it is a different journey.”

Arcel also commented on the circular nature of the story as a way to take book readers at its end back to its beginning in the first film:

“It’s completely circular, cogs and wheels. Everything fits together. It has a great little power to it. It fits very well into the nature of the entire saga itself.”

Oh ok, that kinda makes sense then.



A_C_E said:
Nymeria said:

http://collider.com/the-dark-tower-sequel/

Arcel confirmed as much in EW’s report:

“The hardcore fans of The Dark Tower series will know that this is actually a sequel to the books in a way. It has a lot of the same elements, a lot of the same characters, but it is a different journey.”

Arcel also commented on the circular nature of the story as a way to take book readers at its end back to its beginning in the first film:

“It’s completely circular, cogs and wheels. Everything fits together. It has a great little power to it. It fits very well into the nature of the entire saga itself.”

Oh ok, that kinda makes sense then.

It would only make sense if he has his fathers horn ... perhaps I missed it in the trailer ...



JRPGfan said:
pokoko said:
I read ... three books, I think, before I quit. I just didn't care about the characters and there were long stretches where I felt nothing but boredom. I'm just not a fan of King's novels, which feel like they're over-inflated with hot air. I like his short stories a lot more.

So much this.

Alot of it is just unnessary detail. Like pages worth of it sometimes, when what you actually want is the story telling to get on with it, you want action.

Steven King takes it to the extreme sometimes, and it actually ends up makeing his books less fun to read.

Which ones have you two read?  I like 70's, 80's, and early to mid 90's King. Mid 90's and on I find him a little blah ... It and The Talisman are two of my all time favorite books.



The_Yoda said:
Chris Hu said:
Not really interested in it. But I do look forward to the next Stephen King movie directed by Frank Darabont he has the rights to The Long Walk and The Monkey. I liked all his previous movies based on King stories, The Green Mile, The Mist and The Shawshank Redemption.

Interesting .  i never saw The Mist (didn't remember it being that strong a story).  Shawshank is one of my all time favorites and The Green Mile was good.  Typically movies based off of King's novels suck (with a few exceptions). 

If you liked Shawshank and The Green Mile I'm sure you would like The Mist also even though its in a completly different genre.  I not really a huge fan of horror movies but I really liked The Mist still want to get the two disc Blu ray version of the film and watch it in black and white which was his original plan of how he wanted to release it in theaters.