irstupid said:
Soundwave said:
They have more disposable income and are more well ... hardcore about their games. It's the same thing with certain Amiibos ... it was 30 year old men buying those, not kids. Same thing with the NES Classic ... virtually all adults many of whom were willing to pay 2-3x more than the sticker price.
Nintendo's fanbase in general, while it will always have a section of kids in it is majority 20-40 year olds I would say.
|
That does not explain why non nintendo games sell like 5x more launch week than Nintendo games.
If Nintendo gamers are all old rabid nestolgia gamers with huge disposable incomes, why do they not sell as much as the teeny mature games do on other systems?
|
I think quite a few Nintendo fans passed on the Wii U obviously, it looked like a child's tablet and had (by 2012) the passe Wii brand stapled to it. Just wasn't an appealling system.
Switch has a more rabid userbase clearly, Zelda has a higher tie ratio than the freaking system itself, lol. That tells you many people bought two copies (the collectors edition to keep unopened). That has to be a fairly crazed userbase.
Ditto for NES Classic, we saw people got nuts over that and it's all 30+ year olds. Nintendo sold like 2.7 million of those? They easily could have sold triple that I think. Nintendo just has to offer the right product. You can't make something that looks like a toy and you have to do the main IP right (GameCube for example got both of these things wrong).