By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - PSN Generates More Revenue than Nintendo

So how much of that did they keep as profits?



Around the Network
Podings said:
So how much of that did they keep as profits?

~1.2 billion US dollars.



That's a lot of people who "would never pay for online like Xbox dudes."


Anyways, screw this paid online crap. It was only a matter of time before Sony and Ninty jumped in, since apparently gamers are ok with paying extra fees instead of figuring out how to connect a monitor to PC :|



That kinda makes Nintendo's numbers look more impressive honestly, but it also kinda hammers home why Nintendo is making a pay online service. Way too much money on the table to not do so.



Unless Nintendo comes up with a successful answer to PSN, I think it'll stay this way. Selling a lot of consoles is great, but only coasting on margins from hardware and software will do so much for a platform maker. I hope for their sake Nintendo will take online functions on the platform a LOT more seriously this time because they could be sitting on a goldmine.



Around the Network

Is that before or after they've paid for all the games? Cos turnover and profit are two completely differant things. I could turn over 500 billion pounds but if I spent 600 billion in the process I worth shit ( or more to the point -100 million)



RJ_Sizzle said:
Unless Nintendo comes up with a successful answer to PSN, I think it'll stay this way. Selling a lot of consoles is great, but only coasting on margins from hardware and software will do so much for a platform maker. I hope for their sake Nintendo will take online functions on the platform a LOT more seriously this time because they could be sitting on a goldmine.

Their Virtual Console catalog is a goldmine, we see with NES Classic how valuable it is, if they can leverage that to paid-online success they are going to do well. Particularily the idea of taking old games and adding online play to them I think could be a big money-maker for them. 



tbone51 said:

That bait title, daredevil proving us right again.

 

Edit: At least he admited he was wrong in his last post

What was the original title, tbone? Spill the beans.



Soundwave said:
RJ_Sizzle said:
Unless Nintendo comes up with a successful answer to PSN, I think it'll stay this way. Selling a lot of consoles is great, but only coasting on margins from hardware and software will do so much for a platform maker. I hope for their sake Nintendo will take online functions on the platform a LOT more seriously this time because they could be sitting on a goldmine.

Their Virtual Console catalog is a goldmine, we see with NES Classic how valuable it is, if they can leverage that to paid-online success they are going to do well. Particularily the idea of taking old games and adding online play to them I think could be a big money-maker for them. 

Which is exactly why the NES Classic is taking a dirt nap. With that move, they need to make sure they have as many classic games as possible ready to play. Unleash the beast, Nintendo!



Oneeee-Chan!!! said:
Azuren said:

But

 

We're talking about online services?

Yeah , sony is doing well.

Oh okay.

 

And for the record, I do agree with you. I enjoyed Zelda much more than what time I had with Horizon.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames