By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Why Are Feminists Evil?

They are not evil, they are wackos



My Etsy store

My Ebay store

Deus Ex (2000) - a game that pushes the boundaries of what the video game medium is capable of to a degree unmatched to this very day.

Around the Network
naruball said:
setsunatenshi said:
Evil?

They can be wrong, it doesn't make them evil necessarily.

I think for many people describing themselves as feminists, I would say their intentions and heart are in a good place, but they don't realize the ideology that sits behind what they are declaring themselves to be, actually is sexist in itself and by conception bias against men (and in several forms of feminism against some women as well)

Then you have the professional victims like the Sarkeesian types that simply profit out of that buzzword and are actually destructive to the goals of equality that most of us would agree with. (not equality of results, but equality of opportunities)

I've been to two meetings of feminists and I was pleasantly surprised that though the hardcore ones were all about women's rights, the topics that they discussed and the reaction by most attendees were about men's rights too. They talked about how women are pressured to have a certain type of body and then female feminists would jump in and say, men don't have it much better since they're not allowed to show their feelings or they will be criticised by both men and women. They talked about words that they think are harmful, such as pussy or reference to "having balls" as a good thing, because both harm men and women. They brought up the need for paternity leave (though they said nothing about child custody).

My point is, how many times have people, who accuse feminist of all sorts of things, actually listened to them?  

How many of those reasonable ones get millions in donations and get to speak at the UN council as well as having tons and tons of mainstream websites / media regurgitating their talking points?

 

exactly...

 

Also in the example you have provided, I'm all for them discussing those or other topics. As long as they don't feel like they have some moral highground to make others conform to what they perceive as correct.

The discussion about language I find particularly harmful as it has the smell of thought and speach police. As if limiting the use of x or y words is the correct way to solve any problem.

Also the societal pressures I find a completely pointless subject (again, they should feel free to discuss it as much as they want) because these will always exist. It also reeks of an attempt to control sexuality and what people feel attracted to. Like for some reason it's bad to have a sexy woman / man displaying some sensuality in media.

 

So yeah, there's plenty of points I would disagree even with the more rational kind of feminists, which again, does not in any way make them evil like the OP suggested.



Feminism was invented by left wing extremists back in the 1950s. Feminists are jealous and envious of the success of men. Feminists want everything but they do not want to work for it. Feminists spread lies, misinformation and propaganda to gain support.



"The opposite of a gamer is a feminist."
Never in the history of mankind have I heard that phrase before.

As for videogames. I dont care if the character is female or male. Before HZD came out some people complained that the main character was female and those complaints seemeed, I dunno, weird to me. The game its designed that way, the gender of the character hardly plays any role so you "Not relating" to it its weird. Its not trying to satisfy any "SJW" mentality some people moronically relate to everything. And as for the sexualitation of characters... well shit, games are fantasy, just like comic books, and it goes for both men and women, so deal with it.



Jaicee said:

First off, let's clarify what I mean when I say that I'm a feminist. By that I mean that I count myself as an advocate for the rights of women and support the establishment of equal social relations between men and women and indeed people of all genders. I don't mean something other than that. (I have to say that because apparently lots of people confuse feminism for female supremacy.)

 

It sounds like you're a gender egaliatarian so why not call yourself that?  It's less confusing, more accurate and affects a broader range of people.  The term feminism needs to die.  If a feminist isn't willing to embrace the term 'gender-egalitarian'  then the don't truly want equality.



Around the Network
Miguel_Zorro said:
Jaicee said:

I'm not one who is bothered by women being in video games, even in a few instances where it seemed that they really stretched to make a character female.  It's not a big deal for me.

There are a few issues with feminism that cause people to view it in a negative light.

1) Feminism is not a gender-neutral term.  If equality was truly the goal rather than simply advocacy for women, they wouldn't use the word feminism.  It doesn't mean equality any more than masculism does.

2) Many Feminists frequently use false or misleading stats and examples to intentionally distort situations.  An example is the "wage gap", which ignores variables that lead to differences in pay and incorrectly attributes it entirely to gender.  It's about as valid as saying people in New York City make more than people in South Dakota, which must be a sign of discrimination against people in South Dakota.

3) Many feminists blame men for every problem under the sun.  In many cases men are not the primary cause of these problems.

This!

I don't think I have ever met a feminist that I actually liked. From my experience, they always seem to have some sort of a nonsense agenda and god forbid you like hot women. Heck look at Emma Watson. She calls herself a feminist but recently she did a photo shoot in front of a magazine where she was almost naked. And guess what? Feminists went crazy even saying that Emma Watson isn't a feminist and she just did the photo thing to pleasure men. And Emma Watson responded with "Feminism is about giving women choice and etc and not about what I do with my tits" and the nature of it all is just hilarious. And yes, this was trending pretty big on every social media site.

At the end of the day, I don't have much respect for a lot of the feminists out there. I want equailty for all but what I don't want is one gender taking priority over another. We have other terms for those who want equailty and those who want what's best for a specific gender.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

CaptainExplosion said:
KLXVER said:

Well lets start with calling it a crime and convict them first at least.

Aww, that's not as effective!! You think calling it a crime to kill innocent people stopped Ted Bundy? No, what stopped him was a little thing called electrocution.

Ok, now we have gone from abusive husbands to a serial killer. Thats a bit different. Prison stopped him from killing people. Although he did escape a couple of times.



think about it like this.

you are the best fireman in the city, so much so that there are hardly ever fires anymore, and even when there are it is something small that could easily be put out with a fire extinguisher. now as a fireman, it is your job to make sure there are no fires, but now that there arent any, your job feels unnecessary. of course you dont want somebody's house to burn down, but if it doesnt then whats the point of you being around.

and that is essentially modern day feminism. there arent exactly any major gender separations in the world today, so feminism has basically become obsolete. feminists may hate gender inequalities, but what they really hate more is being ignored. so now they just find any vantage point they can to spark controversy.

so now I'll just bring this analogy to a full circle. a feminist who sparks controversy just so they can remain relevant is the same as a fireman who sets people's houses on fire in order to keep his job.



Feminism lost it's reasons, today we can clearly see it was never about equality.



“On my business card, I am a corporate president. In my mind, I am a game developer. But in my heart, I am a gamer.” - Satoru Iwata

WagnerPaiva said:

Modern feminism is against the women, it harms women, it allies with the very people that oppress them the most, like the Sharia Law Feminists, which want Sharia Law to be the norm, even knowing that Sharia Law is oppressive against women.
Leftists, globalists and most atheists love the feminists, do not think they are evil at all.

Edit: Just after writting it I remembered how Christppher Hitchens HATED feminism and had brilliant articles and rants against it. I take that off.



Most young girls get into feminism having no idea what are they getting into, most young boys do it to please the girls, they are not evil, but naive.
Puppets are never evil, when we say feminism and globalism is evil, we are talking about the puppeteers behind these Agendas, not the good hearted people that fall into it without knowing what they are really supporting.
A simple example is: in real life everyone can see that most men love women, almost worship them, almost fear them, would do anything to please them. In the Agenda they hate women and there should be a neverending gender wars.
The hidden objectives of the puppeteers are evil, destruction of family, sovereignty of the nations and the value of half of the mankind. Unspeakable evil disguised as the most noble of the causes: the protection of the beautiful and precious women.

Someone as religious as you referencing Hitchens in support of your argument is quite amusing, I must say