By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Google's strangulating independent political media on Youtube

so youtube personalities are scared because they have to get their viewers to donate via patreon or procure their own advertisers if they want to live by putting out controversial content

calling them "independent" is a bit rich, when they are this dependent on Youtube/Google getting them advertisers



Around the Network

The way I look at it, it's Youtube's platform. They set the rules and regulations. If you don't like it, you are free to use another platform, or just deal with the changes and secure funding in some other way.

I don't agree with Youtube's changes, but I think it's their right to change anything the see fit.



Lafiel said:

so youtube personalities are scared because they have to get their viewers to donate via patreon or procure their own advertisers if they want to live by putting out controversial content

calling them "independent" is a bit rich, when they are this dependent on Youtube/Google getting them advertisers

The term independent is used loosely these days. The Weeknd is signed by one of the biggest record labels and he lists himself as an independent artist, because he's the only one responsible for what's included in album and what's left out, compared to someone like Britney Spears, who's told what can and can't be included in her albums, he's considered independent.

Independent youtubers are also the ones who decide what to include in their channel, no one has dictated what they can and can't say to benefit from ads money up until now. Compared to Fox news and CNN, they are considered independent.

I agree the term isn't being accurately used here, but in a sense, it can be applied correctly.



LurkerJ said:
Aeolus451 said:

Most republican leaning opinions are considered controversial these days especially since there's a growing number of republicans who are against political correctness. All it takes to be flagged a few times. SJWs. I'm sure they'll go wild with flagging people. It doesn't matter if there's any truth the accusations.

I agree with youtube on the spirit of it but not how it will enforced or how it will likely play out. I'm skeptical person. Most things like that are rarely done in a sensible way. Also, youtube has already admitted that they don't have enough people to go through the amount of new vids they get each day.  They'll likely resort to some kind of automated system that searches for keywords and reporting/flagging. Hell, I bet the reports will handled by a automated system.

Sigh.

Will you be happy to know that a lot of leftists aren't as crazy as the vocal minority? It's not our fault corporates are using left-leaning gender & PC politics to push their hidden agendas. Just like they used right-leaning religious politics to push the same hidden agendas in the past.

In fact, I think movements like "Justice Democrats" is one of the main instigators behind what's happening right now. American democracy is set up, by design, to serve specific types of people, it doesn't matter of those people lean to the left nor to the right.

The current form of American democracy, better described as oligarchy, is threatened, and this systematic offense on youtubers is just their way of eliminating the threat. Protecting the status quo from contagious online-based revolutions and movements is the main theme here.


haha I believe in unicorns (non-crazy leftists). lmao. What's bad is that is really funny to me. In all seriousness, I don't mind them and I like to hear their opinions/debate with them. For example, I like "The Rubin Report." I don't agree with him on some things but he presents a more rational arguement. He gets a little boring sometimes. 

I wonder if justice democrat is just another way of saying socialist. I never heard justice democrat before, though. I think I'm starting to dislike antifa more than I do the SJWs. 



TheLegendaryWolf said:

So is the big mainstream media has stooped so low to fight the dasterdly "fake" news and "alternative" media? Does this mean the likes of The Young Turks will be on say CNN, Sargon of Akkad on FOX, and Phillip DeFranco on MSNBC if they want to make any form of money off of their opinions and not being politically neutral? This is looks like the beginning of the inevitable YouTube "purge" where little by little more and more "controversial" topics joins the list of content demonetization.

We already have an example of that. Cenk Uygur from TYT worked for MSNBC for a while and it didn't work out at all. Love or hate Cenk, his story with MSNBC is an interesting one.



Around the Network
LurkerJ said:
Aeolus451 said:

Most republican leaning opinions are considered controversial these days especially since there's a growing number of republicans who are against political correctness. All it takes to be flagged a few times. SJWs. I'm sure they'll go wild with flagging people. It doesn't matter if there's any truth the accusations.

I agree with youtube on the spirit of it but not how it will enforced or how it will likely play out. I'm skeptical person. Most things like that are rarely done in a sensible way. Also, youtube has already admitted that they don't have enough people to go through the amount of new vids they get each day.  They'll likely resort to some kind of automated system that searches for keywords and reporting/flagging. Hell, I bet the reports will handled by a automated system.

Sigh.

Will you be happy to know that a lot of leftists aren't as crazy as the vocal minority? It's not our fault corporates are using left-leaning gender & PC politics to push their hidden agendas. Just like they used right-leaning religious politics to push the same hidden agendas in the past.

In fact, I think movements like "Justice Democrats" is one of the main instigators behind what's happening right now. American democracy is set up, by design, to serve specific types of people, it doesn't matter of those people lean to the left nor to the right.

The current form of American democracy, better described as oligarchy, is threatened, and this systematic offense on youtubers is just their way of eliminating the threat. Protecting the status quo from contagious online-based revolutions and movements is the main theme here.


I wouldn't call Secular Talk a leftist though. He is much more of a liberal, like the Young Turks. The closest that TYT have to a leftist is Jimmy Dore.



LurkerJ said:

The war WSJ waged against PewDiePie blew up in their faces. An entire organization couldn't take a single independent youtuber down. So how do they escalate? where do they go from here?

The idea that the Wall Street Journal waged a war against PewDiePie or against YouTube at large is a narrative concocted mostly by YouTubers who don't understand journalism and likely have never read a newspaper in their lives. 

H3H3 got laughably outclassed and did their best to torch any credibility YouTubers had on this issue. 



VGPolyglot said:

I wouldn't call Secular Talk a leftist though. He is much more of a liberal, like the Young Turks. The closest that TYT have to a leftist is Jimmy Dore.

from my experience everyone who isn't clearly right wing is considered a "leftist"



Another funny thing, is that no one who talks about WSJ's War on YouTube is apparently capable of doing any googling.

The trumped up narrative is that the Main Stream Media is panicking that they're losing influence to YouTube. While it's true that newspaper circulation is down, a lot of that is due to local papers. The Wall Street Journal is an international brand. They have over two million paying subscribers, which, by the way, is over 30% more subscribers than the entirety of YouTube Red.

How many of a big YouTuber's audience is willing to pay for their content? Even Colin Moriarty, who is killing it now, has only 6,500 people willing to pay for his stuff.

Regarding Colin, he is a good example of someone who gets it. If you rely on a company to host your videos (for free) and also to sell ads for you (for free), you're always going to be at the mercy of that company and it's whims. Your position will always be tenuous.

It's time for YouTubers and new media people to figure out another way to make money. Some of them, like Colin, already have it figured out.



Lafiel said:
VGPolyglot said:

I wouldn't call Secular Talk a leftist though. He is much more of a liberal, like the Young Turks. The closest that TYT have to a leftist is Jimmy Dore.

from my experience everyone who isn't clearly right wing is considered a "leftist"

From my experience, if you are not pro Trump, you are a leftist