That sounds crazy.... common atlus, this is just gonna give you a PR backlash.
Necro-bump this 2020: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=229249
Bumb in 2021: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9047071
That sounds crazy.... common atlus, this is just gonna give you a PR backlash.
Necro-bump this 2020: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=229249
Bumb in 2021: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9047071
You know there should be a ton more focus being put onto online cheating/hacks, than streaming. The real problem is in the multiplayer investments, not the frail folk who lose their minds upon knowing something they were always going to end up figuring out one day.
Chazore said:
End of the day it's still a Gray area, which doesn't automatically mean that it's to always be on Atlus's side or anyone else's for that matter.
|
By whatever name you want to call it, that doesn't mean that Atlus would have any less right than Marvel to not have someone showcase the entire story they wrote on youtube or Twitch.
Although it doesn't seem like that's what this is about per say. It doesn't seem to be about monetization, but about preventing spoilers to be spread to a degree.
I can understand them not wanting youtube videos with blatant spoilers in the title. But just streaming it into a VOD (with an apprpriate title) seems fine to me. If you go to a P5 stream, you should expect spoilers.
Perhaps they will lift this restriction after a certain amount of time has passed?
Hiku said: By whatever name you want to call it, that doesn't mean that Atlus would have any less right than Marvel to not have someone showcase the entire story they wrote on youtube or Twitch. Perhaps they will lift this restriction after a certain amount of time has passed? |
And that's comparing Marvel to a video game company, again video games are not movies or comic books either. Mixing both of them into a Gray area is absically trying to make the area not apepar grey, but appear more within the rights of one side than the other.
The main thing is that people should be going out and playing the games, not searching youtube all the time for anything related to P5, trailer and all, they should be playing the game from start to end. I don't think it's entirely fair to adhere to the spoiler free crowd than it is for everyone else. When these types of topics come up, it's always those that greatly dislike spoilers and they want the job of ignoring them done for them, rather than doing what anyone else could have done for countless centuries and just simply turn the other way or even place more barriers of their own, rather than having the barriers put up against everyone instead. We've already had a thread that showcases an addon for multiple browsers for those who wish to block out spoilers, that solution alone benefits the one not wanting to see any spoilers, all without trying to block it for everyone else.
If they lift the restriction after a few months, then what's to stop all the others from pulling the same stunt, so then in the end if does come full circle to what I was just talking about. That one small group (small enough to not see see public outrage about it 24/7) that wants everything blocked for their own sake while thinking everyone on the planet wants what they want.
I love how Youtube is going about blocking videos for people of certain ages, like a parental restrction system, that system goes into the hands of those who wish to use it, rather than YT enforcing it over absolutely anyone. It's better for the spoiler free people to have the option to block said spoilers than it is to let them have control over what anyone else could watch. The last thing the itnernet needs is a small group controlling it.
VGPolyglot said: Yeah, like they'll be able to enforce that! |
then test them, u dummy.
quezkatolen said:
then test them, u dummy. |
I can't, I don't have the game.
archer9234 said:
No. You are wrong. Not everyone thinks that way. I decide if I want to spoil information about a movie/game etc. or not. Example: I still haven't watch Star Wars 7. I'm waiting for all 3 films to be complete. Then buy the boxset. Guess what: I decided I didn't care if I read some spoilers. I know Han dies, and why. Still buying the movies, once all 3 are done. |
Congratulations, I guess.
Seriously though, I never said everyone thinks that way. I said your overall experience diminishes if you know all the spoilers. To say that is not true is a lie. I do not believe you..
If i knew Han Solo was going to die before I watch the movie I won't be shocked and surprised when it happens no matter how many times I rewatch it.
deskpro2k3 said:
Congratulations, I guess. Seriously though, I never said everyone thinks that way. I said your overall experience diminishes if you know all the spoilers. To say that is not true is a lie. I do not believe you.. |
I don't know. I almost always read the plot of the movie before I watch it, and I still enjoy it. I also watched at least 4 playthroughs of the first Silent Hill before I played it myself, and I still really enjoyed it.
VGPolyglot said:
I don't know. I almost always read the plot of the movie before I watch it, and I still enjoy it. I also watched at least 4 playthroughs of the first Silent Hill before I played it myself, and I still really enjoyed it. |
I'm willing to bet you would've enjoyed it even more if you didn't watch playthroughs. Maybe it'll be more scary that way.
archer9234 said:
Atlus' argument still makes no sense. That's what I'm arguing about. People have choices. Just because atlus gets butt hurt, that someone wants to know the answer. Doesn't make it acceptable, to be an ass to people. And abuse the content ID system, on youtube. |
Why not?Wether it is right or not, its Atlus prerogative to try and hold all streamers from streaming, wether that a good idea or not, or even a nice thing to do.Much like Nintendo and its relation to youtube, outside of reviews and fair use, Atlus can do whatever they want with their IPs.Videogame as a media is a bit different in the sense about streaming and videos about games, because usually games thrive on being shown to the public(as in, that usually translates to sales, because people get interested in the game, which is much different to other medias, as movies), but if Atlus dosent want to, they can do it.
It can be an ass move or whatever, but it makes sense, as I said before, though it dosent make it right or wrong.