By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS4 is burning right now!

 

Wallet is dying, 1 like = 1 prayer

Like 264 76.30%
 
I don't own PS4 82 23.70%
 
Total:346
Nautilus on 29 March 2017
Ali_16x said:

I still need to buy Gravity Rush 1/2, Nioh, Yakuza 0, and Kingdom Hearts 1/2/2.8 and of course Persona 5. Still haven't finished Horizon, to busy with school :(.

And lmao at the same people every time crying about "It's on PC", literally everyone on this forum knows which games are on PC and aren't. I don't understand how people still want to argue it. When someone these days talk about exclusives, they're usually also talking about console exclusives, it's not that hard to understand by now.

Its not crying, its pointing out that those games arent exclusives, since they are present on other platforms.I personally find this "console exclusivity"  BS, since its a way to spin the narrative to make the brand of choice look better.Something is exclusive if it is only available to a certain company owned platform.If it is also on other competitors platform, it isnt exclusive in any way.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Around the Network
Conina on 29 March 2017

"Honestly, I only have one major gripe with Persona 5, and it’s a gripe that I’m not sure is unfair or not. A big part of my ability to invest as much time as I did into Persona 4 Golden was due to it being playable on the Vita, a portable system, and Persona 5 being locked to home consoles (PS3 and PS4) does somewhat hamper my ability to integrate it into my life. While I usually want to be playing the game’s big sprawling dungeons on a TV, the slow intricate social life management sections of Persona are honestly perfect fodder for playing on the sofa while watching TV or on a quick bus ride to pass the time."

Well, thanks to RemotePlay, he shouldn't have any problems playing it on his Vita (with a WLAN connection to his PS4) while watching TV.

But I agree that not being able to play Persona 5 on the bus/plane/vacation is a slight disappointment.



ShadowSoldier on 29 March 2017
TheBlackNaruto said:
Mystro-Sama said:

Makes no sense when you realise they'll be putting all those games on PC soon.

Wait why doesn't it make sense because of that?

Shhhh let him have his moment. 



Black Women Are The Most Beautiful Women On The Planet.

"In video game terms, RPGs are games that involve a form of separate battles taking place with a specialized battle system and the use of a system that increases your power through a form of points.

Sure, what you say is the definition, but the connotation of RPGs is what they are in video games." - dtewi

TheBlackNaruto on 29 March 2017
Nautilus said:
Ali_16x said:

I still need to buy Gravity Rush 1/2, Nioh, Yakuza 0, and Kingdom Hearts 1/2/2.8 and of course Persona 5. Still haven't finished Horizon, to busy with school :(.

And lmao at the same people every time crying about "It's on PC", literally everyone on this forum knows which games are on PC and aren't. I don't understand how people still want to argue it. When someone these days talk about exclusives, they're usually also talking about console exclusives, it's not that hard to understand by now.

Its not crying, its pointing out that those games arent exclusives, since they are present on other platforms.I personally find this "console exclusivity"  BS, since its a way to spin the narrative to make the brand of choice look better.Something is exclusive if it is only available to a certain company owned platform.If it is also on other competitors platform, it isnt exclusive in any way.

But it is still odd games have been on PC since the dawn of time. Whenever someone said PS or Nin exclusive people knew exactly what they meant that the games were only on their consoles. It was only when MS came in the mix that people started tripping off of games being on PC(the XB 360 in particular). Whenever people heard the term "exclusive" before then there were no arguments it was easy to know that people meant on those consoles.

I am not sure why the PC arguments started but they are silly at this point. No one is discrediting the PC but it boggles my mind when it is thrown into a home console/portable console discussion. It NEVER has been before but all of a sudden it is now. The PC isn't even tracked in comparison with the XB1/PS4/Switch/Wii U/3DS etc for video games sales.  It should truly be easy to understand now that if someone says a game is exclusive to Sony/MS/Nin they are saying they are not on the competing platforms(PS4/XB1/Wiiu or Switch). That's just my opnion though I know others have theirs.



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

TheBlackNaruto on 29 March 2017
ShadowSoldier said:
TheBlackNaruto said:

Wait why doesn't it make sense because of that?

Shhhh let him have his moment. 

Okay okay consider it done.



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

Around the Network
Ariakon on 29 March 2017
onionberry said:
people should actually buy those games

Horizon did amazing, MLB, Kingdom Hearts and Persona are bound to do really well, Nier did great in Japan, Yakuza, Danganropa and Gravity Rush 2...um...are also available :) 



naruball on 29 March 2017
Miguel_Zorro said:
JRPGfan said:

Persona 5... at 36 reviews and a 94 score :) hell yeah.

thejimquisition is the only reviewer to give it under 90 ; _ ; and he gave it a 85!

Why Jim... Why?

 

"Honestly, I only have one major gripe with Persona 5, and it’s a gripe that I’m not sure is unfair or not. A big part of my ability to invest as much time as I did into Persona 4 Golden was due to it being playable on the Vita, a portable system, and Persona 5 being locked to home consoles (PS3 and PS4) does somewhat hamper my ability to integrate it into my life. While I usually want to be playing the game’s big sprawling dungeons on a TV, the slow intricate social life management sections of Persona are honestly perfect fodder for playing on the sofa while watching TV or on a quick bus ride to pass the time."

8.5 / 10

 

>_< he scored it lower than he would have, because it wasnt portable? wtf.

I thought I'd seen it all from reviewers.  But lowering a game's score because it's on the wrong console.. that's new.

This may sound weird, but to honest, I couldn't agree more with him. I find the social aspect great on psv but boring on a big screen. Same with visual novels and many other games. If I were to write a completely honest review, I'd give it a lower score for the exact same reason.



The_Yoda on 29 March 2017
JRPGfan said:

Persona 5... at 36 reviews and a 94 score :) hell yeah.

thejimquisition is the only reviewer to give it under 90 ; _ ; and he gave it a 85!

Why Jim... Why?

 

"Honestly, I only have one major gripe with Persona 5, and it’s a gripe that I’m not sure is unfair or not. A big part of my ability to invest as much time as I did into Persona 4 Golden was due to it being playable on the Vita, a portable system, and Persona 5 being locked to home consoles (PS3 and PS4) does somewhat hamper my ability to integrate it into my life. While I usually want to be playing the game’s big sprawling dungeons on a TV, the slow intricate social life management sections of Persona are honestly perfect fodder for playing on the sofa while watching TV or on a quick bus ride to pass the time."

8.5 / 10

 

>_< he scored it lower than he would have, because it wasnt portable? wtf.

Welcome the the Vita-Switch effect



Valdath on 29 March 2017

Still need to get GR2, Yakuza 0, Horizon, FFXV and Nier (my next one).

Damn.



The_Yoda on 29 March 2017
Bandorr said:
TheBlackNaruto said:

But it is still odd games have been on PC since the dawn of time. Whenever someone said PS or Nin exclusive people knew exactly what they meant that the games were only on their consoles. It was only when MS came in the mix that people started tripping off of games being on PC(the XB 360 in particular). Whenever people heard the term "exclusive" before then there were no arguments it was easy to know that people meant on those consoles.

I am not sure why the PC arguments started but they are silly at this point. No one is discrediting the PC but it boggles my mind when it is thrown into a home console/portable console discussion. It NEVER has been before but all of a sudden it is now. The PC isn't even tracked in comparison with the XB1/PS4/Switch/Wii U/3DS etc for video games sales.  It should truly be easy to understand now that if someone says a game is exclusive to Sony/MS/Nin they are saying they are not on the competing platforms(PS4/XB1/Wiiu or Switch). That's just my opnion though I know others have theirs.

Since when have people had to be THIS clear with exclusives?

Do people really want me to say Persona 4 is not on the PS Vita, Steam, Windows 10, Xbox one, Xbox 360, Wii U, Switch, Nintendo 3d, Nintendo New 3ds, and the ps3 (as long as we are talking in the west) or can I just say it is exclusive?

You open a thread talking about the ps4. You look at a long list of games that are ALL on the ps4. Do people really need to go "wait that is on PC, that is on the ps2 and ps3, that is on vita" etc. Or can they just not accept it isn't on any Microsoft or Nintendo systems (minus DDD that is a part of 2.8).

The same would be said if you made the inverse of it. If you talked about a list of PC games and you included Danganronpa, Nonary, and Nier along with a bunch of other PC games - in a thread about PC - no one should go "but but but it is on Playstation".

People need to use context and understanding.

Or when people are boasting you can't play this anywhere else i.e. what the term exclusive means and you can in fact play it on other platforms, then they need to say "console exclusive" not "exclusive"

ex·clu·sive

ikˈsklo͞osiv/

noun

an item or story published or broadcast by only one source.