What does the X2 look like?

While I believe you, I would like to know what he is wrong about. See, my way of thinking is (and call it hopeful thinking) that someone that is smarter than me says something, I say, "that could be logical" and then someone else that is smarter than me tells me why what the other person said is nonsense and I go, "OK, now THAT makes more sense" but instead, I have not gotten that. I prefer to go with clarity. I am not smart enough to just take sides, I need it to be dumbed down for me otherwise, I can be fooled.

Here I will give you an example since he has quite a few things wrong

For example, he is saying that the Switch consumes 7.5 Watts of Power while in Portable mode and the Tegra X2 consumes 7.5 Watts of Power. Thus making it the same. But the lolz worthy part about that is the Switch consumers 7.5 Watts of power in portable mode because it underclocks itself where as Tegra X2 consumes 7.5 Watts of Power (According to nvidia) in full performance mode.

He also says that the minimum for the X1 is going to be 15 Watts which is wrong cause a) According to Nvidia's own post which he linked, it's rated at 10 Watts (granted it can go up) and b) underclocking results in lower watts/TDP. 

So yea... That's just one of the many points he is wrong in... He has no clue what he is talking about

2 things:

1) You managed to confuse me.

2) That leads me to believe you are correct.

Thank you.

This is the interesting part because his video explains that the power consumption is the main reason he comes to this conclusion. Switch's power consumption is better than a stock Tegra X1's power consumption. That is exactly what brought me here in the first place.

Could it be a modified Tegra X1 then?

there is no X2 in commercial use, so we don't know - it won't look the same as the X1, it uses different CPU cores, a different GPU architecture and has a wider memory bus (all of which should be visibly different in a die shot)

and it's been designed for 16nm process, while the Switch SoC is manufactured in 20nm (like the X1)

While I believe you, I would like to know what he is wrong about. See, my way of thinking is (and call it hopeful thinking) that someone that is smarter than me says something, I say, "that could be logical" and then someone else that is smarter than me tells me why what the other person said is nonsense and I go, "OK, now THAT makes more sense" but instead, I have not gotten that. I prefer to go with clarity. I am not smart enough to just take sides, I need it to be dumbed down for me otherwise, I can be fooled.

This is the interesting part because his video explains that the power consumption is the main reason he comes to this conclusion. Switch's power consumption is better than a stock Tegra X1's power consumption. That is exactly what brought me here in the first place.

Could it be a modified Tegra X1 then?

This guy really seems to know what he is talking about... especially in the comments section. Is it possible that the SOC for Switch is really X2? I found it interesting although it makes little difference to me. Really, this was about the fact that I did not see that anybody else had posted this video or discussed the possibility of the console having the X2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTZAQ-E3Yfc

Wrong. The X2 is in commercial use. Just not in any direct consumer segments. Volta Tegra which is the successor to the X2 has been demonstrated in the market as far back as January in cars.

You are right that it will look vastly different than the X1.