Those murders arnt muslims to 99.9% of muslims, get your head out of your ar**

I don't think you understand the concept of baiting.

But yes, I agree. It is unacceptable. Will the kid become a terrorist? Who knows. The majority of Terrorists in Australia however do not come from overseas. They are born in Australia. They are Australians.

Don't get me wrong, I am Atheist, I would prefer if no religion existed, it sets humanity back, religion often actively erodes scientific achievement.
However Australia is built on the pillars of "Freedom of Religion" and it's implied "Freedom from Religion" in the constitution. Which I will defend.

Of course the far-right groups like One Nation wishes to remove such protections from the Constitution and remove the Racial Discrimination Act.

Correct.
But is it appropriate for groups of people to band together and start attacking innocent people in retaliation? We have law enforcement for a reason. They are trained in this field. Let them do their job.

Countering violence with violence is unacceptable.

Are you suggesting it's fictitious? But you are correct. They didn't mention his name.
But they do with this article: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-30/bail-refused-over-muslim-school-knife-threat/5778562

And here are supporting Articles:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/man-sought-over-knife-threat-at-islamic-school-in-sydney/news-story/554a2770e283e22b0405c08457ed11ab
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/man-charged-over-sydney-islamic-school-knife-incident-20140926-10mw4c.html

Terrorising of course.

They were seperate events/issues however.

Indeed. But the conservative powerbase is supported by the religious nutters. Case in point: The Australian Christian Lobby, Marriage Alliance etc'.

And yet. I can still provide more links. They were just an example to get a point across. Shall I provide some more?

One Nation has power *now*. They don't need majority power to have power, they just need to hold the balance of power, which in many instances, they do.
Plus, allot of their policies align with the Liberals who are center-right wing. (Which makes sense, Pauline Hanson is an ex-liberal.)

Same thing goes with the nutty-greens who are far-left, they often align themselves with our center-left "Labor" party to get what they want, they don't need to hold the majority power to achieve their goals.

It's still a far cry from your last claim that the far-right have no voice. ;)

The majority of our News Papers is right-wing or center-right thanks to the Dominance News Corp has and is not Left leaning.
https://www.quora.com/Which-are-right-wing-media-and-left-wing-media-in-Australia

The ABC and SBS is Left-wing.

7 News, 9 News and their ilk tend to be more sensationalist.

Far-right extremism seems to be gaining traction all across the western world.
Trump was a big push towards that, it allowed allot of groups to justify their positions. Brexit has fueled various groups as well.

Islamists claiming they're muslims is like flat earthers claiming they're scientists.

Saw what looked like a female bystander trying to take a picture of someone lying injured on the bridge  

It wouldn't surprise me if she had then posed for a selfie...  

all I said was that those signs look like they got the same font/text style. whoever made it clearly has malicious intent.

This is simply not true.

In the UK at least for a long while and now in the US since the past few years. White guys are the bad guys by default and Muslims/Blacks/Women/Gays are presumed good and honourable when in a position that looks compromising.

Jo Cox an MP here in the UK was murdered last year, a man who was a racist murdered her who clearly WAS mentally ill, but the media at the time inferred links to neo-nazi-white-supremaist groups which were completely without any merit Even now, every few days her name is referrenced followed by Brexit and then linking Brexit to racism, then white supremacy. It never stops and it comes constantly from low IQ Labour MPs virtue signalling at every available opportunity.

It's intellectual dishonesty and your comment is in a way because you aren't being specific. The only media organization that calls out extremism is Fox News, the rest of the them do everything they can to excuse it.

Apologizing to extremeists encourages them further.

An impulsive non virtuous choice, still rather that than stab the fuck out of an innocent police officer and ruin the lives of countless families, leaving children witout a mum and dad.

It's good to see you have your priorities right and reserve the "nausea" smiley for the right moment.

Your first paragraph is right on the money.

It then descends into regressive false equivalence playbook 101. America bombed a school by accident where there was a legitiamte hostile target and you are making a comparison with that and the inentional murder of innocent civilizans where the target was - innocent civilizans.

Two different issues, neither are "righteous", and they are completely unrelated apart from the possible use of the propaganda for your first paragraph, but you don't seem to be interested in fleshing out the intellectual side of that, instead, simply blaming and drawing up a false equivalence.

I'm just pointing out, no one gives a shit about those people. 

There's something like 200,000+ civilians killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, that means for every one person that perished tragically in the World Trade Center, 67 died in those countries who had nothing to do with it. Is that equivalent?

They are related, terrorism didn't magically spring from no where, it's here because we kept poking a bear in the middle east because we're greedy for oil and now there's an unending cycle of violence thanks to extremist nuts being emboldened. 

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand why a lot of people there hate the West or can be easily radicalized. Having one of your family members blown apart in a "accidental" bombing for instance. 

A lot of people believe they are.

But then again, the same can go for people believing flat earthers are scientists too.

People in one group are much more likely to also be in the other than an average person.