80, because people will get miffed at the graphics, animations and bugs.

im worried. Hearing terrible thing about it, and im a huge ME fan. Let's say.... 77

Yet to play another tps with the satisfaction of charging in as a vanguard causing a biotic explosion. If i was the only one that felt this way the multiplayer would be dead ages ago, and let me tell you its still going strong into its 5th year.

Bioware, Mass Effect, I have to think it will be better than message boards are making it out to be...

My prediction: 88

75

83

Not very confident... wouldn't be surprised if I look very stupid after this lol

Depends. If EA paid reviewers with a ton of swag, I'm sure they'll ignore all that is wrong in the game, and give it high 8s and even 9s. And I'm talking about animation and acting worse than those games published by Focus Home Interactive (which are more average in those areas, but I still enjoy them), which reviewers would take a few points off for.  So, 85-90.

If not, then they'll give it 6s and 7s. Or a metascore ~70.

Really trying this time. 84. This thread looks very unofficial though. Where is the hourly updated table? To quote one of my mentors, "I feel as if, to puke."

Hmm i guess. I never tried the multiplayer so didn't think of it from that angle. 

83, might be more since the gameplay looks excellent and story might improve towards the end. held back by animation, dialogue and bugs as the other said. Its is horizon but more buggy and larger game.