They have a near complete list of all countries on another website. Mine is Congo size but it doesn't feel that big. lol
As has probably been said before, the Congo and Asian stats are likely a fabrication or exaggerated in order for porn sites to sell the BBC stuff. If 7 is average then that means, 9 would be quite commonplace or even more and yet 9s are quite rare and 10+ functional is pretty much unseen.
Black guys are bigger though ^
| LadyJasmine said: Black guys are bigger though ^ |
Might be a marginal size difference, but the numbers are often exaggerated.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full
From a real consistent study they conclude " Lynn [31] suggest that penis length and girth are greatest in Negroids (sub-Saharan Africans), intermediate in Caucasoids (Europeans, South Asians and North African), and smallest in Mongoloids (East Asians), but this is based upon studies that did not meet our present inclusion and exclusion criteria. The greatest proportion of the participants in the present meta-analysis were Caucasoids. There was only one study of 320 men in Negroids and two studies of 445 men in Mongoloids. There are no indications of differences in racial variability in our present study, e.g. the study from Nigeria was not a positive outlier."
Many sources likely choose to use the one that simply did things wrong or weren't consistent in their studies.
This next bit is just a personal guess. But it seems to me that since black dudes are often tall and skinny from these countries that it becomes easy to measure. While white dudes from these countries are more likely to be fat which hides the true length, and lastly asians are shorter and pudgier than black guys so they get the shortest end of the stick.
Farsala said:
Might be a marginal size difference, but the numbers are often exaggerated. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full From a real consistent study they conclude " Lynn [31] suggest that penis length and girth are greatest in Negroids (sub-Saharan Africans), intermediate in Caucasoids (Europeans, South Asians and North African), and smallest in Mongoloids (East Asians), but this is based upon studies that did not meet our present inclusion and exclusion criteria. The greatest proportion of the participants in the present meta-analysis were Caucasoids. There was only one study of 320 men in Negroids and two studies of 445 men in Mongoloids. There are no indications of differences in racial variability in our present study, e.g. the study from Nigeria was not a positive outlier." Many sources likely choose to use the one that simply did things wrong or weren't consistent in their studies. This next bit is just a personal guess. But it seems to me that since black dudes are often tall and skinny from these countries that it becomes easy to measure. While white dudes from these countries are more likely to be fat which hides the true length, and lastly asians are shorter and pudgier than black guys so they get the shortest end of the stick. |
Haaaa!!! I see what you did there :D
SKMBlake said:
With the political issues there, you should be glad to not be born in Congo. |
I'm glad I wasn't born there... I know that Brazil have a lot of shit going on, but it still have a higher standard of living than most African countries =[
About how they would do this type of survey... there are plethora of doctors that work with penis, there are corpses, army selection and other times men will be naked and examined and the size could be estimated.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Every guy wants to be as big as Ron Jeremy!
Farsala said:
Might be a marginal size difference, but the numbers are often exaggerated. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full From a real consistent study they conclude " Lynn [31] suggest that penis length and girth are greatest in Negroids (sub-Saharan Africans), intermediate in Caucasoids (Europeans, South Asians and North African), and smallest in Mongoloids (East Asians), but this is based upon studies that did not meet our present inclusion and exclusion criteria. The greatest proportion of the participants in the present meta-analysis were Caucasoids. There was only one study of 320 men in Negroids and two studies of 445 men in Mongoloids. There are no indications of differences in racial variability in our present study, e.g. the study from Nigeria was not a positive outlier." Many sources likely choose to use the one that simply did things wrong or weren't consistent in their studies. This next bit is just a personal guess. But it seems to me that since black dudes are often tall and skinny from these countries that it becomes easy to measure. While white dudes from these countries are more likely to be fat which hides the true length, and lastly asians are shorter and pudgier than black guys so they get the shortest end of the stick. |
You mean the shortest stick at the end, of course.
And what is your age? How have you come to possess such wisdom?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
