If this was reversed and Hilary Clinton was president and banning the conservative press, calling for a war on the press, etc. one month into her presidency for asking too many questions about her emails, the Republicans would be crying bloody murder and probably calling for armed revolt and impeachment. 

Hypocrites the lot of them who silently will sit by now and say nothing. 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/24/obama-press-pac-reporters-president-white-house_n_5618220.html

Not that it makes what Trump has done right but I don't remember the members of VGCharts decrying Obama when he did something similar.  Perhaps I'm wrong and there were threads about it and I just missed them if so I will gladly eat the words coming next:

The double standards are getting old

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/24/obama-press-pac-reporters-president-white-house_n_5618220.html

Not that it makes what Trump has done right but I don't remember the members of VGCharts decrying Obama when he did something similar.  Perhaps I'm wrong and there were threads about it and I just missed them if so I will gladly eat the words coming next:

The double standards are getting old

These instances weren't out of malice or anger, like Trump's. Obama never cited fake news like a whiny baby and blocked them specifically. It's not like  Obama was selective during these intstances, which were justified imo if you read the article, Trump is allowing certain outlets to be there and other's not to be there. That's an issue with self insecurity and him being afraid to be called out on shit that he's said and doesn't remember he said, and swears up and down he didn't say it, then the press brings up exact quotes and he throws a fit. Obama and Trump...no way in hell they're comparable. One has class, the other doesn't. 

The press has gone too far with their campaign against Trump. If they purposely lie to the public and disobey to journalistic standards (like the so called fact checkers that claim one-sided, unproven and ideologically colored opinions to be facts) they should be held accountable because they threaten democracy.

I am a fan of free and critical press if it stays truthful, fair and honest. But here they want to destroy him and his family with whatever it takes and this goes way too far.

The press should let him do his work and criticize the results where necessary instead of spreading pure hate. He really and honestly plans to make life better and safer for everyone and this should be honored instead of being sabotaged.

And I really cannot believe that so many people here believe the bullshit written by the media about him. If you watch his speeches or conferences and read the news afterwards you will see that they are outright lying or making things up. They not only put things out of context, they often make things up and provide extremely negative headlines about things he never said or meant this way.

Instead of attacking Trump on a personal level and writing 99,9% negative artickles about him, the media should do their job and report abput the massive immigrant riots in France https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJXvHRsjzBQ , but they want to hide the truth and bring along their own political agenda.

These instances weren't out of malice or anger, like Trump's. Obama never cited fake news like a whiny baby and blocked them specifically. It's not like  Obama was selective during these intstances, which were justified imo if you read the article, Trump is allowing certain outlets to be there and other's not to be there. That's an issue with self insecurity and him being afraid to be called out on shit that he's said and doesn't remember he said, and swears up and down he didn't say it, then the press brings up exact quotes and he throws a fit. Obama and Trump...no way in hell they're comparable. One has class, the other doesn't. 

From another instance that i linked above:

The campaign says that a limited number of seats forced it to make the tough decision of which journalists would be permitted to follow the Democratic presidential candidate in the last four days of the campaign, but the papers are calling foul, claiming they were targeted for their editorial-page positions and kicked off while nonpolitical publications like Glamour and Jet magazines remained on board.

Eliminated from the plane's traveling press were the Washington Times, the New York Post and the Dallas Morning News.

My bad I forgot Glamour and Jet magazines >  Washington Times, the New York Post and the Dallas Morning News

This instance is nearly exactly the same cherry picking of Jet and Glamour over real political publications because said publications were critical of him at the time.

In my opinion one is just a more eloquent liar than the other but to each their own.