Pemalite said:
Sounds like you expected more than your i7 could deliver. :P You probably should have looked towards the 2011 and 2011-3 sockets instead of Intels Mainstream/Mid-range quads.
I have always opted for more CPU cores over less, always. Back in the Core 2 Quad days people would often tell people not to bother with the quad-cores as nothing could use all those cores... Ironically, those Core 2 Quads have aged rather well, especially overclocked where they can still give AMD's FX quads a run for their money.
I am waiting to see how the market reacts to AMD shaking things up. I am hoping Intel reacts with big price-cuts across the board, Intel is also launching LGA 2066 during the middle of the year, so hopefully lower pricing flows over to that platform, which maybe my next upgrade.
|
Well, I wasn't going to spend 2,500 on a PC. Still glad I didn't do that. Now, if I spend 2,000 on a PC today, it would be great. I don't care what Itel does in raction to AMD. I'm going with AMD, because they are the ones who forced Itel's greedy claws to loosen up on the price in the first place (assuming that happens). So, AMD shall be rewarded for that. I'm not waiting for a price drop. I need 8 cores. Would have gladly gone 16 if there was any available, but, either way, it'll be enough for me.