S.T.A.G.E. said:
Dravenet7 said:
Yeah I'm gonna stop you right there at the bolded...
"I dunno how to weigh the pros and cons of this argument" <- You being confused with an argument.
"They have enough free reign to create a upgraded Xbox that is not needed but cannot make better exclusives." <- The argument you are confused by. Conviently the argument I never made, but you replaced it with your own.
So we can confirm, through your words and arguments alone, you confused yourself. Based on that, it is not me, who read to deeply, but you not reading at all.
As for most of what you said after, I don't have to respond to that... because I already did. You simply chose to change it for your argument. Which, again by your own words, you don't know how to weigh.
As for the Sony thing, no they are not confused. They knew exactly what they were doing. Only you are confused and that is by your own admittance.
|
[I think it is you who is twisting my words]. When I said I dont know how to weigh the pros and cons of the argument I was referring to, it was in context to the sentence which came before that, which was clearly about their priorities with a second console (Since there is no need for one) vs exclusives. I was admitting that I cannot ultimatley get into Microsoft head to understand their logic when they are supposedly trying to prop up their PC market. It just makes no sense at all.
I said, if Microsoft can develop a second console...it is telling about how much free reign they have within the division. Microsoft is fighting a petty battle over graphics, to distract from their glaring issues, which are exclusives. But again...the only thing I admitted I was confused about was their priorities.
|
... Are you even reading at this point? Twisting what words? You mean the full sentences I am taking directly from what you said, word for word, and highlighting? Something is literally not twisted, if it is taken word for word.
To highlight this let's look at what I underlined. This is the line that literally came before your struggle (confusion) to weigh the pros and cons of the argument:
"They have enough free reign to create a upgraded Xbox that is not needed but cannot make better exclusives."
^^^^^^^^^^ That line. The line which you bolded from my last post. The line which I fully explain, if you look literally after the quote where the "<-" is, that this is what you are confused by...
There is no way you read I posted. No way. Because if you did, I wouldn't be reading what you just posted. You essentially restated that you were confused by your own argument.
- It's like you bit a green apple, then a red one, I say that you bit the red one after the green one, and then you claim I changed the story attempt to correct me by saying you ate the green apple before the red one...
...
Now aside from that. Everything bolded and italicized... This is the very first time PC was specifically mentioned. At all. Not even between just our posts, in the thread entirely. You are making this up as you go. "It just makes no sense at all"... (That quote is you highlighting your confusion of your own words. Again. Specifically through the words in italicized.)
The best part of this all is that you just verified that instead of actually dealing with my argument, you replaced it with your own, and then proceeded to get confused by it.