Slimebeast said:
Peh said:
PAGE 5 !!!
Slimebeast said: "You see, the offspring largely inherit the behaviour of their parents."
You are a liar!
You are dishonest!
That's why you are so full of bullshit and I called you out on it. And now you tell me, you never implied that?
And then you send me a source with "Criminal acitivity of immigrants and their children".
|
What's wwrong with your reading comprehension?
Yes, it's true that the offspring largely (not fully, but I never made such claim because I know my facts) inherits the behaviour of their parents. The criminal behaviour of children of immigrants in that study is closer to the criminal activity of their parents than it is to the criminal activity of ethnic Swedes.
|
Ask that yourself:
In conclusion we can say that criminality amongst the children of immigrants
is, to a certain extent, exaggerated. The supposition that the children of immigrants
are very prone to commit crime is unfounded, with the exception of certain
limited groups. These groups are highly visible and contribute to a distorted
picture ofthe actual situation. However, it is important to follow-up the continued
development of criminality amongst the children of immigrants. If residential
segregation is allowed to continue at the same time as more and more children
ofimmigrants are excluded from the labour market, there is a real risk that
criminality will increase in the long-term within this population group.
Do you even know what a claim is? Are you kidding me?
You said: "Just like it's done in research and in official statistics all over the world. You see, the offspring largely inherit the behaviour of their parents."
That's a claim by you where I asked for proof that the offspring largely inherint the behaviour of their parents. Whereas you replied in a condescending way:
"You believe there are no sources to backup such a basic, elementary fact in behaviour biology? LOL "
You provided NONE!
Now you spinning it around like you never made that claim.