By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Milo Yiannopoulos book deal cancelled following outrage over child abuse comments

Simon & Schuster pulls forthcoming autobiography, titled Dangerous, for which it had reportedly paid a $250,000 advance

 Milo Yiannopoulos giving a speech at Trinity University, San Antonio. Photograph: ZUMA Wire/REX/Shutterstock

Simon & Schuster has cancelled the publication of Milo Yiannopoulos’ book, and his fellow Breitbart employees have reportedly threatened to quit if he is not fired.

statement from the publisher late on Monday said: “After careful consideration, Simon & Schuster and its Threshold Editions imprint have cancelled publication of Dangerous by Milo Yiannopoulos.”

Yiannopoulos confirmed the report on Facebook with a post: “They canceled my book.”

He added: “I’ve gone through worse. This will not defeat me.”

The book was reportedly secured for an advance of US$250,000 (£200,000) and was to be published by Simon & Schuster’s conservative imprint, Threshold Editions.

According to Yiannopoulos’ Facebook page, the book – an autobiography titled Dangerous – was due out on 13 June.

It is the third book that Yiannopoulos has announced that has not eventuated, after he flagged forthcoming titles on the Gamergate controversy and Silicon Valley that never appeared.

Threshold Editions has been contacted for comment by the Guardian.

Simon & Schuster’s decision follows outrage over a recording that appeared to show Yiannopoulos endorsing sex between “younger boys” and older men. The remarks were made during an internet livestream and circulated in an edited video on Twitter.

In the clip, Yiannopoulos said the age of consent was “not this black and white thing” and that relationships “between younger boys and older men … can be hugely positive experiences”.

The American Conservative Union subsequently rescinded its invitation to Yiannopoulos to speak at its annual CPac conference over the “offensive video … condoning paedophilia”. Matt Schlapp, the ACU chairman, said Yiannopoulos’ response was “insufficient” and urged him to “immediately further address these disturbing comments”.

The Washingtonian also reported that employees at Breitbart in the US, where he is a senior editor, were threatening to quit if Yiannopoulos were not fired.

In a video that was on his Facebook page for a few hours on Monday, Yiannopoulos said, of reports that he had endorsed child abuse, that “nothing could be further from the truth”.

“I find those crimes to be absolutely disgusting. I find those people to be absolutely disgusting.”

He did not contest the recording but said his comments were “stupidly worded” and that it had been edited to remove context.

“In most cases – you guys know – if I say something outrageous or offensive, in most cases my only regret is that I didn’t piss off more people, but in this case if I could do it again I wouldn’t phrase things the same way. Because it’s led to confusion.”

The video was no longer available on Facebook three hours after it was posted. Yiannopoulous later publicised that he would hold a press conference in New York on Tuesday afternoon.

Yiannopoulos’ book deal with Simon & Schuster was condemned by many who perceived the publishers to be giving him a mainstream platform for his often offensive and controversial views.

Color of Change, a US organisation for racial justice, had campaigned online against Simon & Schuster since the book was announced. Its petition against their spreading “hate speech” had 50,000 signatures and it said it had directed nearly 1500 calls to the publisher’s offices in recent weeks.

Rashad Robinson, the executive director, told the Guardian that its decision to publish the book had said “racism sells”, adding: “They were willing to cultivate hatred and racism in order to make money.”

He hoped the decision to pull the book would send a message to other media platforms “that you should be careful who you stand beside”.

Roxane Gay, the author and feminist commentator, wrote on her website: “In cancelling Milo’s book contract, Simon & Schuster made a business decision the same way they made a business decision when they decided to publish that man in the first place.”

She said that her decision to pull her forthcoming book How to be Heard from Simon & Schuster in protest at Yiannopoulos’ book deal stood.

“Simon & Schuster should have never enabled Milo in the first place. I see what they are willing to tolerate and I stand against all of it.”

Yiannopoulos was permanently banned from Twitter in July 2016 for instigating abuse of the Ghostbusters actor Leslie Jones.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/feb/21/milo-yiannopoulos-book-deal-cancelled-outrage-child-abuse-comments

 

So, what do you guys think about what has transpired?



Around the Network

While I don't know who any of these people are it looks just like another thing that has been blown out of proportion.

It seems these days making an innocent comment is equated with proudly defending a certain ideology to the death.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

The dude is a child abuse victim, it's absolutely outrageous the mainstream media have put out a hit piece on him for this, and the mainstream media need to stop with all this ridiculous hit piece's before what little shred of credibility they have left is gone.



Groundking said:
The dude is a child abuse victim, it's absolutely outrageous the mainstream media have put out a hit piece on him for this, and the mainstream media need to stop with all this ridiculous hit piece's before what little shred of credibility they have left is gone.

Why is it relevant that he is a victim of child abuse? It's obvious from the tape that he approves of sexual actions between underage boys and men.

OT: Milo is a vile human being but not mainly for this incident. So I find it hypocritical that this published only after this incident cancel the book deal. They should have been honest about it and say that it was a pure business decision, trying to claim some sort of moral high ground is just pathetic.



Dude is scum. He deserves whatever happens to him. Seriously. I have more respect for Trump than this clown.

As for what he actually said, I can't say that I agree with him but it's far from the worst idea he's expressed or thing done. How or why any university agreed to give him a platform to speak is beyond me.



Around the Network

Can't say I really like anything Milo has to offer outside of his feminist debates.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

I actually don't mind him based on things I've heard prior but he did condone relationships between 28 year and 13 Year olds. I'm not going to criticise him for speaking on his own experience but he's too smart to not understand that most 13 year olds are literally a year into puberty, they're children and not mentally of physically comparable to an adult.



Groundking said:
The dude is a child abuse victim, it's absolutely outrageous the mainstream media have put out a hit piece on him for this, and the mainstream media need to stop with all this ridiculous hit piece's before what little shred of credibility they have left is gone.

I don't understand.  Why shouldn't it be reported that his book deal was cancelled?  Is he someone who should be untouchable?  Is he someone special that news about him should be ignored?  Explain to me the problem with this article, which publishes comments from the accused and his explaination--where, by the way, he does not deny that he made a mistake.

Though, honestly, "and that it had been edited to remove context," is an amusingly ironic complaint given where he works.



Oddly enough George Takei had exactly the same happened to him, got sexually touched at 13 age and laughed about it [including the moderators] and said he liked it [2:20]. Somebody brought up Stockholm syndrome or coping mechanism? Strange things.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hDSOyuuSi4





The witchhunt against Milo is a disgrace for Western democracy.

How can you cancel a whole book because of just one statement even if it was abhorrable (it wasn't). Scandal.