Yeah, I don't think it's a conspiracy...at all.

I find it so ironic when they make fun of Trump. Most of these people are Hillary or Dem supporters of course, the people who make it very clear that human beings are all different, and should always be accepted and treated with decency, so don't make fun of them, help them, no matter what.
Don't you dare tell that person in a wheelchair they can't do that because their in a wheelchair. Don't you dare tell that little boy or girl they can't be a public speaker just because their illiterate. Find a way to make it happen! Everyone should be able to be what they want to be!

A good overall thought process for the less fortunate no doubt.

Unless you want to be something like President, or maybe a brain surgeon, those kinds of things. You can't be those... and if you try to be, we'll completely change our viewpoint and spend all our time making fun of you, to discourage you from doing that because we don't agree at the moment. Now if we do agree later on, then that's ok, but don't expect an apology about it either.

LOL

This is low even something from Alex Jones ...

Funny how conservatives call this nonsense and a joke when Kenyan/non American/muslim Obama conspiracy theories were widely accepted by many

Edit: I obviously don't think he's illiterate. Just thought I'd point it out before someone calls me a brainwashed lefty (even though I'm not even a lefty)

There's plenty of evidence to prove W was an idiot. For God's sake, he destroyed Iraq due to false claims of weapons of mass destruction. 

I doubt he's illiterate, but I don't think he's a strong reader.

I don't think Trump has been diagnosed with anything that would make illiteracy reasonable. For all we know, he's a healthy person that was just too lazy to learn how to read. Well, assuming this is true, which I really doubt. Becoming the president of the most powerful country in the world while being illiterate seems highly unlikely to me.

Alex Jones thinks the Sandy Hook shooting was faked.

Well, either the whole of the CIA and NSA were idiots, or they just refuse to accept they were making shit up.

Heard a radio interview with an Ex-CIA dude and he admitted that all the intel was wrong (in hindsight). But that CIA and NSA "honestly" thought it was more probable that Saddam was secretly doing WMD stuff, and they were obviously in GWB's ear about it and telling him what he wanted to hear. If course GWB was looking for a reason to invade. But I think the confidence of the Intel community and GWB's confirmation bias meant he believed the WMD were there and he really was totally surprised when it turned out to be BS. The guy said that while the intel community were working off sketchy information because they had no good sources of intel direct from the Saddam regime their assessment was that it's better to invade and be wrong about WMD than to not invade and maybe be right about WMD. But they were still acting only on probability and best guess, not on a high degree of certainty.

I think the case can be made perahps that Bush was a bit intellectually lacking, but not based on the Iraq shit show.

What Bush and Blair should be roundly criticised for is making up reasons after it became clear there were no WMD. Oh we had to invade because he's a bad dude. We had to invade because terrorism (which Saddam has never been linked too). Because it was the moral thing to do. Couldn't admit that they went in based on bad intel, which they believed at the time to be possibly true rather than likely to be true.

For the record, I was always opposed to the Iraq invasion as soon as Blair and Bush started using the term "regime change". But the worst of it is the fact they both still say that they did the right thing. Y'know, if they let Iraq deal with Saddam on its own terms and its own time we might not have ISIS today. We might still have Saddam today, but I think there's an argument to be made that he's the lesser of two evils between him and ISIS.

Unpresidented yes but not illiterate.