If you count only the physical visitors, media is right (despite the rain and the fact that entry often was blocked by protesters)
If you count in the online viewers that Spicer brought into the discussion, Trump had more viewers than any president before and he was given that information.

Both sides are right, depending on the viewpoint so where is the problem. The fake news story is the media claiming that Trump meant physical watchers while he was referring to all watchers (physical + online).

There are zero lies here just different perspectives and mainstream media that want to destroy Trump at any cost. The problem is that too many people are blindly believing the media without checking the real facts.

yeah this is absolutely a political discussion. The only substantive point you give regarding your (re)definition fake news is all about politics. Everything else is merely a very vague suggestion that it could be in any other subject matters. Nothing of substance. I consider this thread in the same category or your (re)definition of fake. The only reason you made this thread is because of politics. Nothing more nothing less.

If it wasn't stressed already, your definition of fake is wrong. Don't just try to change the definition of words to suit whatever agenda you have. I avoid these politics threads because they are so flagrantly annoying in regards to manipulating information.

Enough with the, "Alternative Fake News" and "Alternative Not Just Politics".

EDIT: I'd be hard pressed to bet more than 2 people in this thread discussing or suggesting anything other politics. So far there are none. This doesn't belong in the General Discussion.

Many media reports about Trump are Fake News. Like the Terror attack in Sweden of which he never talked about in his speech. (I watched the whole event and he was completely misunderstood and never said or meant that there has been a terror attack, he usually speaks about the extreme rise in crime and violence against women in Sweden and Germany and meant it that way. The reporter creating the false story must have never watched a Trump speech before. Also in Swedish local newspapers there are daily stories about many crimes commited by illegal immigrants or ISIS members because these are really happening)

But I also think that the term fake news is not not the best.

There are completely false news, but this is less than 1% of what falls under the fake news label.
Then there are one sided and biased news that focus on a very small part of the truth while leaving out other more or equally important parts, which leads to a false conclusion.
Then there are news based on fake facts or manipulated statistics, nearly all fact checking results fall under that category because they often are not true or based on fake facts or ideology.

Many of the fake news are debatable. Both sides cannot prove or disprove a fact or argument because their sources are biased or the very complex truth depends on the point of view. The world is complex and often there is not just a simple true or false.