By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Trump's First Solo Press Conference as President

Soundwave said:
Slimebeast said:

Wow. That's one of the most commonly used counter-arguments used against the claim that freedom of speech is being oppressed in Sweden and other Western countries by the left. Nearly every leftist come dragging with that argument.

By saying that, you deny the huge negative influence on freedom by political correctness, social stigmatization, virtue signaling and on top of that, hate speech laws. You also imply that being critical of mass immigration and imported crime and filth is the same as racism.

I don't expect any better from the masses, but I expected more from you.

Why is being called racist so bad? You apparently have no problem correlating a group of people with "filth"? Seriously I wouldn't have an issue is racists just say they are racist. They don't like certain types of people. 

It's not very hard. 

Because it's a stigmatized and misused vague term.

But I believe that some cultures are vastly superior to others, and I believe in a certain degree of separation from bad cultures.

Of course I don't like certain types of people. And you don't either. It's perfectly normal. What's abnormal is that an ideology like socialism tells people to lie about this.



Around the Network

Damn! Trump is already making people mad in this thread LMAO ... 

Well it's like he said last year, "Happy New Year to all, including to my many enemies and those who have fought me and lost so badly they just don't know what to do. Love!" ... 

It's too sad to see his haters taking the bait so easily ...



SpokenTruth said:
Slimebeast said:

As a doctor I bathe in money, but I am not allowed free speech. It is sick. Our society is sick to the core.

You don't want free speech, you want fredom to oppress.

That's the type of ridiculous accusation and stigmatization we see all the time from the left. Perfect example.

What have I said in this thread that suggests I want freedom to oppress?



Slimebeast said:
Soundwave said:

Why is being called racist so bad? You apparently have no problem correlating a group of people with "filth"? Seriously I wouldn't have an issue is racists just say they are racist. They don't like certain types of people. 

It's not very hard. 

Because it's a stigmatized and misused vague term.

But I believe that some cultures are vastly superior to others, and I believe in a certain degree of separation from bad cultures.

Of course I don't like certain types of people. And you don't either. It's perfectly normal. What's abnormal is that an ideology like socialism tells people to lie about this.

Actually, I like most everybody. 

I've never looked at someone and said "I don't like you because you are of XYZ characteristic".  

But really when I see people I generally see humanity. I don't see "oh a group of colored people, look at how weird they are". I see "oh there's a mother tending to her child, it's the most basic of human things". 

That might be where you and I differ. I believe people have far more in common and our differences are largely superficial. We all suffer, we all feel, we all are going to age, we all are going to face death.

Would you even want to live on a planet with just one ethnicity, one type of food, one type of history, one type of food? Fuck no from me. 

Do you really think the pigment of your skin makes you superior to someone else? Do you think this line of thinking will take you anywhere positive in life? Ask yourself logically. 



RolStoppable said:
Slimebeast said:

Wow. That's one of the most commonly used counter-arguments used against the claim that freedom of speech is being oppressed in Sweden and other Western countries by the left. Nearly every leftist come dragging with that argument.

By saying that, you deny the huge negative influence on freedom by political correctness, social stigmatization, virtue signaling and on top of that, hate speech laws. You also imply that being critical of mass immigration and imported crime and filth is the same as racism.

I don't expect any better from the masses, but I expected more from you.

I implied no such thing.

It has been established in the football thread that you are a racist. You were convinced that black people should not play for the French national team even if they were born as French citizens. Also, your stance on immigration isn't consistent, because at one point you felt sorry for Polish immigrants in the UK while other immigrants in other countries should be treated like dirt and kicked out. There's a high level of bias in your posts and that leads to such double standards. You think that Poland is cool for whatever reason and thus their people should have special rights that you wouldn't grant to others.

It wouldn't surprise me if you got shamed in real life, because your sense of judgment isn't fair at all. You talk about huge negative influence on freedom by hate speech laws. If hate speech laws bother you...´what is going on in your mind?

I'm sorry what?



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Slimebeast said:

Wow. That's one of the most commonly used counter-arguments used against the claim that freedom of speech is being oppressed in Sweden and other Western countries by the left. Nearly every leftist come dragging with that argument.

By saying that, you deny the huge negative influence on freedom by political correctness, social stigmatization, virtue signaling and on top of that, hate speech laws. You also imply that being critical of mass immigration and imported crime and filth is the same as racism.

I don't expect any better from the masses, but I expected more from you.

I implied no such thing.

It has been established in the football thread that you are a racist. You were convinced that black people should not play for the French national team even if they were born as French citizens. Also, your stance on immigration isn't consistent, because at one point you felt sorry for Polish immigrants in the UK while other immigrants in other countries should be treated like dirt and kicked out. There's a high level of bias in your posts and that leads to such double standards. You think that Poland is cool for whatever reason and thus their people should have special rights that you wouldn't grant to others.

It wouldn't surprise me if you got shamed in real life, because your sense of judgment isn't fair at all. You talk about huge negative influence on freedom by hate speech laws. If hate speech laws bother you...´what is going on in your mind?

This is a low level of argumentation. But I'll respond since others are reading.

Neither black or white people should play for the French team if they don't have a genuine connection to France. A total foreigner who came to France as a 12 year old is not a frenchmen to me only because it says "France" in his passport.

About Polish people, is it my fault that they are awesome people and close to my people culturally? Is it my fault that my country benefits from Poles and other European immigrants while other immigrants are an enormous burden?

There's not a double standard whatsoever.

Hate speech laws bother me because they are misused, and they target people who just express opinions critical about immigration. Just like you imply in your very post where you label me a racist! In your world being sceptical about mass immigration of foreign culture young male migrants who commit havoc in our peaceful societies = racism.



Slimebeast said:
RolStoppable said:

I implied no such thing.

It has been established in the football thread that you are a racist. You were convinced that black people should not play for the French national team even if they were born as French citizens. Also, your stance on immigration isn't consistent, because at one point you felt sorry for Polish immigrants in the UK while other immigrants in other countries should be treated like dirt and kicked out. There's a high level of bias in your posts and that leads to such double standards. You think that Poland is cool for whatever reason and thus their people should have special rights that you wouldn't grant to others.

It wouldn't surprise me if you got shamed in real life, because your sense of judgment isn't fair at all. You talk about huge negative influence on freedom by hate speech laws. If hate speech laws bother you...´what is going on in your mind?

This is a low level of argumentation. But I'll respond since others are reading.

Neither black or white people should play for the French team if they don't have a genuine connection to France. A total foreigner who came to France as a 12 year old is not a frenchmen to me only because it says "France" in his passport.

About Polish people, is it my fault that they are awesome people and close to my people culturally? Is it my fault that my country benefits from Poles and other European immigrants while other immigrants are an enormous burden?

There's not a double standard whatsoever.

Hate speech laws bother me because they are misused, and they target people who just express opinions critical about immigration. Just like you imply in your very post where you label me a racist! In your world being sceptical about mass immigration of foreign culture young male migrants who commit havoc in our peaceful societies = racism.

lol, you're racist, just own it. The hilarious irony here is Trump cowtowing to Russia likely puts Poland and much of Europe at huge risk. 



RolStoppable said:
Normchacho said:

I'm sorry what?

Is it the context that is lost on you? The bolded sentence is about football.

Or is something else the problem?

The bolded part, is that really true? That seems almost too blatant to be believable...source?



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Soundwave said:

Do you really think the pigment of your skin makes you superior to someone else? Do you think this line of thinking will take you anywhere positive in life? Ask yourself logically. 

Hmm ... Yes the pigment of your skin colour does make you superior to someone else! 

Hey, don't blame me when you wanted us to ask ourselves logically so we can't exactly ignore the relationship between IQ testing and races discovered by scientists ... 

User is moderated for this post - Aura7541



LivingMetal said:
Whether you agree with him or not, I like the fact that he doesn't take shit from anyone.

This should be a mandatory thing for anyone who calls him or herself human... Or sentient...