By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Trump's First Solo Press Conference as President

fatslob-:O said:
Wyrdness said:

The irony here is funny considering your posts, I'll keep highlighting the flaw in you earliar logic no matter how hard it is for you to swallow.

Again if you can't read the is no saving you as the post reads religion impacted many cultures in future along with the other factors I mentioned if you don't know what the word impact means and don't understand what the sentence is saying that's not my issue because your reply here hardly says anything to back your earliar claims on race defining culture when the rest of us pointed out what really shaped culture.

What you said still doesn't invalide my statement about how race creates culture ... 

What other factors ? 

It must be nice for you to keep using the argumentum ad populum fallacy ...

You must not have read what the moderators said. They kind of wanted people to stop talking about race.



Around the Network

This is still the best one lol

ALLLLLRIGHTY THEN!



VGPolyglot said:

You must not have read what the moderators said. They kind of wanted people to stop talking about race.

Sure thing, consider it as my last post on this thread ... 



fatslob-:O said:

What you said still doesn't invalide my statement about how race creates culture ... 

What other factors ? 

It must be nice for you to keep using the argumentum ad populum fallacy ...

Because race is a product of evolutionary adaption it has no bearing on culture in any means, people have different skin tones because the body adjusts to the intensity of the Sun and environment. The colour of a person's skin doesn't determine their culture it's what the person is taught and what they learn that does that, this is why your whole argument crashes the other factors were listed in the post's examples again if you didn't read the post it's not my problem, race has never created culture.



fatslob-:O said:
VGPolyglot said:

The link that you just showed me admits that it pretty much exclusively sampled Western industrialised countries. It is not a comparison of different races.

According to the APA report the heritability of intelligence is still 0.75 (that's still high) when you're an adult so I'm not sure how one of my source using mostly western countries for sampling changed anything about my conclusion ...

You are really being a dumb person for reading too much into IQ scores. High IQ means jackshit. No one is rewarded for having a high IQ score, people are rewarded for their persistence, their ability to sit down for hours to read and recite information they are gonna be tested on, their willingness to tackle problems until they're solved regardless of their IQ score.

Modern civilization rewards persistence, determination, ability to work within a team, leadership more than it rewards intelligence. The education system, the standardized tests, colleges, more often than not, test your patience in following arbitrary rules. Some highly intelligent individuals achieve nothing and let others with lower intelligence to pass them by and lead the way. Why? Becuase isolating intelligence from the rest of the other metrics, and using it as the sole indicator of someone's superiority is pretty dumb.

Not to mention, Blacks have bigger penises, hence, they are superior in the eyes of a horny woman. In other words, no race wins all aspects, so you can't possibly have a winner under different circumstances. In the bedroom, bigger penises win. 

There are many arguements which you can use to argue over the superiority of one race over the others, yet, you chose a dumb one to parade. Have fun belonging to a race that is more intelligent on average. In case you need a reminder on what "on average" means; it means a member from the "inferior races" can still have higher IQ than yours, it goes nicer with his bigger penis as well



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Slimebeast said:

Wow. That's one of the most commonly used counter-arguments used against the claim that freedom of speech is being oppressed in Sweden and other Western countries by the left. Nearly every leftist come dragging with that argument.

By saying that, you deny the huge negative influence on freedom by political correctness, social stigmatization, virtue signaling and on top of that, hate speech laws. You also imply that being critical of mass immigration and imported crime and filth is the same as racism.

I don't expect any better from the masses, but I expected more from you.

I implied no such thing.

It has been established in the football thread that you are a racist. You were convinced that black people should not play for the French national team even if they were born as French citizens. Also, your stance on immigration isn't consistent, because at one point you felt sorry for Polish immigrants in the UK while other immigrants in other countries should be treated like dirt and kicked out. There's a high level of bias in your posts and that leads to such double standards. You think that Poland is cool for whatever reason and thus their people should have special rights that you wouldn't grant to others.

It wouldn't surprise me if you got shamed in real life, because your sense of judgment isn't fair at all. You talk about huge negative influence on freedom by hate speech laws. If hate speech laws bother you...´what is going on in your mind?

Rol is so cool. 



I know never to attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity, or in this case, never attribute to a cunning president what can adequately explained by an discerning public. "In the land of the blind..." and all that.
But everything we're seeing here is consistent with upcoming dictatorship (No, that doesn't mean I think the US is actually in danger of losing its democracy any time soon, but it still isn't a sign of good things). Slowly (or rapidly, as is the attempt here) erode trust in the media as the main voice of commentary and potentially criticism of one's political actions as well as anyone who stands in your way, eg. questioning a judges credentials when they block your order.
It's pretty basic stuff. If you plan on getting away with a lot of lies, the first step is to devalue the truth.
What a lot of people don't realise as that the Trump administration's goal is not to convince people of their angle over the press', it's to keep this war with the media up for long enough that people will get so fatigued by always trying to work our who's lying that they will eventually stop caring, leaving the government in a nice position of being to do whatever they like.

I'm still trying to work out if him and his administration are complete idiots or diabolically clever. Because whenever I see Spicer being sent out in front of the press to protect Trump's ego, I'm always left thinking "...I could spin a lie better than that."
Just tell people that the Trump inauguration photos were taken earlier in the day than the Obama inauguration photos were, so people were still showing up. It's not rocket science Spicer!





- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

naruball said:
Locknuts said:

I think Baldwin's Trump is funny, but there are opportunities to make fun of the other side like the fake media etc and SNL don't even bother.

It's like they're biased or something....

I love it when people repeat word for word what Trump says.

And I love how up until recently, most people didn΄t talk about "fake media" despite FOXNEWS being easily the most watched "news" program.

I didn't realise I had just quoted Trump 'word for word' but if I have then he's right.

All I'm saying is that there are opportunities for humour on both sides and SNL avoid it if it means making fun of liberals. They did it right through the campaign so it's not just because Trump won.



Wyrdness said:

Because race is a product of evolutionary adaption it has no bearing on culture in any means, people have different skin tones because the body adjusts to the intensity of the Sun and environment. The colour of a person's skin doesn't determine their culture it's what the person is taught and what they learn that does that, this is why your whole argument crashes the other factors were listed in the post's examples again if you didn't read the post it's not my problem, race has never created culture.

Yes race really doesn't have an affect on culture by ANY means, not especially in education if we take a look at how the sub-saharan countries are performing ... /sarcasm 

LurkerJ said:

You are really being a dumb person for reading too much into IQ scores. High IQ means jackshit. No one is rewarded for having a high IQ score, people are rewarded for their persistence, their ability to sit down for hours to read and recite information they are gonna be tested on, their willingness to tackle problems until they're solved regardless of their IQ score.

Modern civilization rewards persistence, determination, ability to work within a team, leadership more than it rewards intelligence. The education system, the standardized tests, colleges, more often than not, test your patience in following arbitrary rules. Some highly intelligent individuals achieve nothing and let others with lower intelligence to pass them by and lead the way. Why? Becuase isolating intelligence from the rest of the other metrics, and using it as the sole indicator of someone's superiority is pretty dumb.

Not to mention, Blacks have bigger penises, hence, they are superior in the eyes of a horny woman. In other words, no race wins all aspects, so you can't possibly have a winner under different circumstances. In the bedroom, bigger penises win. 

There are many arguements which you can use to argue over the superiority of one race over the others, yet, you chose a dumb one to parade. Have fun belonging to a race that is more intelligent on average. In case you need a reminder on what "on average" means; it means a member from the "inferior races" can still have higher IQ than yours, it goes nicer with his bigger penis as well

Did I hit a nerve ? 

And contrary to what you say you are rewarded for having a high IQ. It's a gift from none other than the genetic lottery itself. What if I told that the ability to acquiring and learning information was tied to a score ? After all you can't just ignore overcoming that wall ... 

@Bold Oh really ? Then why have other mammals failed to build modern civilizations comparable to ours ? 

Funny what you mention about genitallia conceptions when it's found to be not supported by scientific evidence. I'm not trying to say that one race has a definitive advantage in all aspects and you're right at least about that ... 

You think it's dumb but many studies show a strong correlation to the affect that it has on life ...