By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Survey: What exactly upsets you about DLC for BOTW

 

Stance on BOTW DLC

Fine execept for the harder difficulty 99 18.97%
 
Zelda should not have DLC 56 10.73%
 
Zelda having DLC is fine ... 67 12.84%
 
Hate the idea of DLC in general 70 13.41%
 
Gonna wait and see if its worth it 55 10.54%
 
Planning on getting it along side BOTW 86 16.48%
 
Indifferent/do not care 68 13.03%
 
Will wait a big for a com... 21 4.02%
 
Total:522
Peh on 15 February 2017
m_csquare said:
PAOerfulone said:

A) Games like Mario Kart 8, Hyrule Warriors, and Smash Bros?

Wait sm4sh DLC is great now? if so, then SF5 DLC deserves a fckin gold medal 

I don't know SF5 DLC, but do you get new characters and stages?



Intel Core i7 8700K | 32 GB DDR 4 PC 3200 | ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming | RTX 3090 FE| Crappy Monitor| HTC Vive Pro :3

Around the Network
TheAkutsu on 15 February 2017

I really don't mind.
Maybe I'll go for it at some point, but it's clearly not necessary.



m_csquare on 15 February 2017
Peh said:
m_csquare said:

Wait sm4sh DLC is great now? if so, then SF5 DLC deserves a fckin gold medal 

I don't know SF5 DLC, but do you get new characters and stages?

you get characters, stages, costume, and the best part of it you can use fight money to get them all. Yes, you can get the DLCs for free if you actually play the games



TheAkutsu on 15 February 2017
m_csquare said:
PAOerfulone said:

A) Games like Mario Kart 8, Hyrule Warriors, and Smash Bros?

Wait sm4sh DLC is great now? if so, then SF5 DLC deserves a fckin gold medal 

that is exagerated.
Smash 4 dlc definetely is better for one reason : lack of necessity due to the already good amount of characters even without it. 

If you want that stage that was present in a previous iteration of Smash, or you want Cloud/Bayo, you may be tempted, but you have an already huge cast of character. Where SFV's cast is ridiculously low, (way way way) lower than SFIV and the new characters need to be paid ? That is the outrage.
And sure you can "just" play till you have enough fighting point on a character.
But a lot don't feel like doing that, specially when their main is a now a DLC character.

If you plan an answering somebody was maining a former Smash character than is now a DLC, it goes down to Lucas/mewtwo that aren't top tier. (when Bayo/Cloud are)

yet all this doesn't make it pay to win, and I do not think it makes SFV pay to win either, Karin/Vega being really good for instance and not DLC.

But the lack of characters by default sure make it lame on SFV for new chars to be addionnal fee.



animegaming on 15 February 2017
m_csquare said:
PAOerfulone said:

A) Games like Mario Kart 8, Hyrule Warriors, and Smash Bros?

Wait sm4sh DLC is great now? if so, then SF5 DLC deserves a fckin gold medal 

Smash 4 DLC completely puts Street Fighter V to shame just for who we got and how the full game was actually content complete.



Around the Network
m_csquare on 15 February 2017
TheAkutsu said:
m_csquare said:

Wait sm4sh DLC is great now? if so, then SF5 DLC deserves a fckin gold medal 

that is exagerated.
Smash 4 dlc definetely is better for one reason : lack of necessity due to the already good amount of characters even without it. 

If you want that stage that was present in a previous iteration of Smash, or you want Cloud/Bayo, you may be tempted, but you have an already huge cast of character. Where SFV's cast is ridiculously low, (way way way) lower than SFIV and the new characters need to be paid ? That is the outrage.
And sure you can "just" play till you have enough fighting point on a character.
But a lot don't feel like doing that, specially when their main is a now a DLC character.

If you plan an answering somebody was maining a former Smash character than is now a DLC, it goes down to Lucas/mewtwo that aren't top tier. (when Bayo/Cloud are)

yet all this doesn't make it pay to win, and I do not think it makes SFV pay to win either, Karin/Vega being really good for instance and not DLC.

But the lack of characters by default sure make it lame on SFV for new chars to be addionnal fee.

we are talking strictly abt dlc. Beside the amt of chars dont mean much on fighting games if the balance is all over the place



animegaming on 15 February 2017
m_csquare said:
Peh said:

I don't know SF5 DLC, but do you get new characters and stages?

you get characters, stages, costume, and the best part of it you can use fight money to get them all. Yes, you can get the DLCs for free if you actually play the games

which is a shit lord of grinding by winning online matches something that only really works for the hardcore crowd not the casual crowd which is the majority.



animegaming on 15 February 2017
m_csquare said:
TheAkutsu said:

that is exagerated.
Smash 4 dlc definetely is better for one reason : lack of necessity due to the already good amount of characters even without it. 

If you want that stage that was present in a previous iteration of Smash, or you want Cloud/Bayo, you may be tempted, but you have an already huge cast of character. Where SFV's cast is ridiculously low, (way way way) lower than SFIV and the new characters need to be paid ? That is the outrage.
And sure you can "just" play till you have enough fighting point on a character.
But a lot don't feel like doing that, specially when their main is a now a DLC character.

If you plan an answering somebody was maining a former Smash character than is now a DLC, it goes down to Lucas/mewtwo that aren't top tier. (when Bayo/Cloud are)

yet all this doesn't make it pay to win, and I do not think it makes SFV pay to win either, Karin/Vega being really good for instance and not DLC.

But the lack of characters by default sure make it lame on SFV for new chars to be addionnal fee.

we are talking strictly abt dlc. Beside the amt of chars dont mean much on fighting games if the balance is all over the place

It's a good thing Smash 4 balance is pretty decent.



m_csquare on 15 February 2017
animegaming said:
m_csquare said:

Wait sm4sh DLC is great now? if so, then SF5 DLC deserves a fckin gold medal 

Smash 4 DLC completely puts Street Fighter V to shame just for who we got and how the full game was actually content complete.

and USF4 balance makes sm4sh look like an amateurish fighting game. What's the point of shifting the topic here?

 

"sm4sh balance is decent" kekekekekekeke



animegaming on 15 February 2017
m_csquare said:
animegaming said:

Smash 4 DLC completely puts Street Fighter V to shame just for who we got and how the full game was actually content complete.

and USF4 balance makes sm4sh look like an amateurish fighting game. What's the point of shifting the topic here?

 

"sm4sh balance is decent" kekekekekekeke

Because you compared one of the most barebones fighting games with it actually having 2 fucking season passes vs one of the most content complete packages of the entire generation and actually insisted the former had better DLC.