EricHiggin said:
PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4, PS? |
Weren't you saying "4 years is the norm for Microsoft"? What does PlayStation has to do with it?
EricHiggin said:
PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4, PS? |
Weren't you saying "4 years is the norm for Microsoft"? What does PlayStation has to do with it?
Hynad said:
Sorry. I don't see a norm there. |
EricHiggin said:
PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4, PS? |
Hynad said:
Weren't you saying "4 years is the norm for Microsoft"? What does PlayStation has to do with it? |
It doesn't. It explains why you don't see a norm there with XB 4 year cycles though.
EricHiggin said:
It doesn't. It explains why you don't see a norm there with XB 4 year cycles though. |
The reason why I don't a four years console life cycle as a norm on Microsoft's side is because they don't have a 4 years life cycle as a norm.
Miguel_Zorro said:
I went back and checked the dates. It's a combination of Sony releasing at more spaced out intervals, Xbox doing the same but with a smaller sample size, and Nintendo releasing more rapidly than the others for the last couple of generations. PS1 - Sept 1995 (North America) - came out Dec 1994 in Japan XBox - Nov 2001 (NA) NES - October 1985 (NA) Nintendo generally releases consoles more often, and it's getting to the point now where the generations don't align. While the 360 was released fast, Microsoft any Sony re-aligned with the XBox One/PS5. You can call it Nintendo releasing faster or Sony releasing over a longer time frame - it's the same effect. If Nintendo releases the next console post-Switch 5 years later in 2012, that will only be 2-3 years after the next Playstation Console. This only re-aligns if the Switch is an enormous success and Nintendo waits 8 years before releasing another system. |
The problem with the Switch in the timeline is that it is not only a successor to the Wii U, but also the 3DS. That would make its launch 6 years after the 3DS debuted. So, nothing really different from the 5-6 years. I expect Sony to go back to a 6 year schedule this gen, releasing the PS5 in 2019. Even if Nintendo continues to release 2 years before Sony does, it doesn't really change them being in the same gen.
guess he missed the part that new games made for Scorpio will also run on X1
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
It does appear that generations are coming to an end. We're moving to a continuous upgrade cycle, as we've seen forever with PCs. So, I get what the dude is saying - it's a very big step forward in terms of power. I don't thinks he's intending to say anything more than that.
VAMatt said: It does appear that generations are coming to an end. We're moving to a continuous upgrade cycle, as we've seen forever with PCs. So, I get what the dude is saying - it's a very big step forward in terms of power. I don't thinks he's intending to say anything more than that. |
Exactly. This should also please the PC mustard race because consoles won't hold it back as much.
Snoopy said:
Exactly. This should also please the PC mustard race because consoles won't hold it back as much. |
Well the games will be made using Xbone and PS4 as the base and PS4P, Scorpio will just be high res version of it. I am not sure how this helps
exclusive_console said:
Well the games will be made using Xbone and PS4 as the base and PS4P, Scorpio will just be high res version of it. |
Not exactly, they can increase the textures, fps, AA, ect. Just like pc games.