| pokoko said: That's actually a recent change when Nintendo created an Audit and Supervisory Committee which kicked Executive Officers down the pecking order a bit. Now they have to be reappointed every year. Above him is a whole list of Japanese Directors and Senior Executive Officers. They're the ones who make the big decisions. No one is talking about going against Nintendo's leadership, either. They're talking about divisions having enough autonomy to make minor-yet-important decisions on their own and shape policy to conform to regional differences. Forming relationships with third-party developers, for example. |
Thanks for the info!
I checked it out, and disagree with going down on the pecking order. I think it's quite the opposite. The executive committee actually have a bigger role in decision making and it can react quickly when someone has a good idea - and it also can make it a companywide policy. There's also lots of more stuff here, when talking about, say, silent information. The yearly evaluation for the executive committee members is because of the bigger role of the committee.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
