Hopefully! 

Oh so the DS4 is superior because you can recharge it with an extra battery or extended cable that, surprise surprise, you need to buy separetely?Oh comon, you can do better than this.Not to mention that you need to be close to a power socket that as far as I know, its not always next to everyones coach, let alone within the reach of a charges cable.

What? You don't need to buy any extra cable or charger for the DS4 controller. It comes with a USB cable for charing the controller in the box and the controller has a USB port. Nothing extra needs to be bought to charge the ontroller. And it doesn't matter where you need to be or if its a couch or not. The bottom line is that if you want to play you game while charging your controller its possible. And that is the point of all this.

The real problem here is that not only you are nitpicking, but you are complaining about an nonexistant issue.I mean, if the Switch came with 5 eextra games, a metal detector and a smartphone, it would be great, added value, but you need to see the cost of it.Yes, getting a battery inside the grip could cost only an extra 5 dollars(Im guessing, have no idea how much it costs), but its still an extra 5 dollars cost for Nintendo, an extra cost that is through unnecessary.

Nitpicking? Non existant issue? Ok fine... then why is nintendo making a seperate grip that cost $30 that also enabes this non issue? If I am nit picking to complain abouyt this, then nintendo must be al kinds of stupid and wasteful to invest in making accomodations in their production pipeline just to accomodate such a feature.

And lets do the math:lets assume that Nintendo sells all of its innitial shipment in 2 weeks.So thats 2 millions.Nintendo will be getting an extra 10 millions dollars extra on profits.How is that ignorable?They made a seperable grip just because of that, for people like you that think 20 hours of charge is somehow not good enough for one playthrough session in an item that holds long enough for 99% of the costumers.In another words, its a nice option, but an unnecessary one, and thus why they are selling separetely.

LOL...... and with this there is no point to continue any of these kinda discussions with you.

And you resorting to calling me a nintendo fan and dispensing it as mere blinding defending the company shows just how much thought you put into the matter.

Grow up..... there is nothing wrong with being called a fan. I am a sony fan through and through. The literal definition of being a fan just means you support something. Being a fanboy means you are fanatical about that thing you support.  There is nothing wrong with being the fan of something, that is very veryu very very different being called a fool.

Oh and in his case you are blindly defending something. Cause veen if what you say is true, there is absolutely no reason other than a cash grab why they didn't just include the USB grip in the box as opposed to having anyone have to go and buy it seperately. We are talking about a USB port here...... USB PORT. That little ommission means that as is, its IMPOSSIBLE to play the switch on a TV and charge the controller at the same time unles you are willing to spend an additional $30. Think about that for a second. 

But another factor goes in my mind, We still dont know if the Joycon can be charge while on sleep or turn of mode. If it cannot then it will be fuck up.  

I really don't know what else i can say to you. Go to GAF, majority there feels the same way I feel on this thing. If you don't bring shortcomings like this to nintendos attention, how can they possibly improve? Thats what a proper supporter of a platform should do. But instead you just gobble up whatever they throw at you and help them attack everyone else? well good luck with all that.

The DS4 cable is roughtly one meter long.I dont see how you can play a game confortably in that setup, unless you sit right next to a power socket.As for your last point, you are better than this.Fanboy in this context(and be honest, thats what you basically called me in that analogy) is as the same as calling me an idiot.But lets stop this here, I dont want to go down that hole.

You are still missing my point. It doesnt matter if the DS4 cable is 30cm long. It still allows you be able to charge and play simultaneously. And its also using a generic USB cable, meaning I could have it plugged into my laptop and charge while playing on my TV, I could use the charger for my phone....etc. All these things you are saying is not answering the one thing I can saying. You want to shut me up? then tell me how I can play the switch on my TV and charge the controller at the same time. Without spending an additional $30

Im not gobbling up whatever they throw.I find the acessories price horrible.The Joy-con(the pack) could have been 10 to 20 dollars cheaper and the Pro Controllers price would be ideal at 60 dollars for example.Their online offering(so far) seems really bad too.That one game per month for that month only is especially bad.But I wont deny when Nintendo made a good choice, and one of them being the battery life inside the joy con.Lets assume that the average hardcore gamer plays 5 hours a day.Thats 4 days without recharging.I get that for you that is unnaceptable for it not recharging on the grip, but for the majority of the costumers, it simply wont be an issue.When they finish playing the game, they will simply go to the main unit and put the joycons in it and reacharge them.If they forget one day, no proble, they still have 15 hours and so on.But for people that want the "complete" package, they are selling a grip with a recharger.Thats why there is one.

Well thats all good. But you still don't get it. It doesn't matter if the battery life is 3hrs or 100hrs. It is just extremly flawed engineering to omit such a little feature, to omit something that means you limit or inhibit how your product is used for whatever their reason. But it gets a lot worse when you consider that they actually thought about it. Thy actually realized this would be something useful to some people and even though its something every console in history has been able to do. Then decide to charge you seperately for it. Thats just wrong. And again, we are talking about a USB port here. You know they grip they sell for $10 without the USB port, they could make the same thing with a USB port and earphone jack, sell it for $5 and still make a profit. Yet the sell one with a USB port for $30???!!!

Just remember, we are talking about a USB port. I didn't bitch this much about the 32GB of storage becase at least the system comes with some storage and its easy to add in more. But this is a USB port, and this means that for something nintendo markets primarily as a home console, meaning they expect you to use it primarily on your TV (their silly marketing not mine, left to me they should market it as a handheld) they somehow made it such that you can't charge the controllers and play on the TV at the same time unless you spend extra money.

Just remember, we are talking about a USB port. I didn't bitch this much about the 32GB of storage becase at least the system comes with some storage and its easy to add in more. But this is a USB port, and this means that for something nintendo markets primarily as a home console, meaning they expect you to use it primarily on your TV (their silly marketing not mine, left to me they should market it as a handheld) they somehow made it such that you can't charge the controllers and play on the TV at the same time unless you spend extra money.

Considering Sony was losing a couple hundred dollars per unit, that's not exactly the same thing.  Still, that price was too damn high and was mostly Sony's fault for having such expensive HW.  But guess what?  Sony learned from that mistake and thus we have the PS4.  Looking at the Switch, what exactly has Nintendo learned?  I'd say absolutely nothing.  In fact, I'd say they've gotten worse.

They still overestimate the value of their SW, for proof look at VC and what they are offering for the games you can borrow for a month if you use their network.  They still keep chasing that Wii dream, even though late last gen and this one proved motion control was basically dead.  They were talking BS after the 3DS about no more expensive Nintendo HW, then months later launch the Wii U, with its last gen HW, for $349 (this was for the Deluxe, the only model that was at all appealing).  Now, they're asking $299 for a tablet that basically has the same innards of the $199 Shield (which even that should be cheaper, now).  But, since it doesn't come with a game, not even 1, 2 Switch, they are asking $360 for it.  If you want 2 players, which I'm sure most people want, that'll be $440.  If you don't want to keep swapping out Joycons, you need the extra charger, so $470.  Damn, we're getting pretty damn close to that PS3 price.  Hmm.  And I haven't even added in the price of internet.

If Nintendo wanted to actually play it smart this gen, they could have done the EXACT same thing, only using more readily available mobile chips.  Even using more top of the line chips, plus a 6.2" 1080p screen, they could have got this thing on shelves easily for $199.