By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Who is the most money grubbing console maker in the industry?

Tagged games:

 

Who is the most money grubbing in the industry?

Nintendo 373 42.05%
 
Sony 122 13.75%
 
Microsoft 269 30.33%
 
Ouya Lives! 20 2.25%
 
See results. 103 11.61%
 
Total:887
UnderstatedCornHole said:
Grubbing...
grub
ɡrʌb/
verb
gerund or present participle: grubbing
1.
dig or poke about in soil.
"the damage done to pastures by badgers grubbing for worms"
synonyms: dig, excavate, burrow, tunnel; More
2.
search in a clumsy and unmethodical manner.
"I began grubbing about in the waste-paper basket to find the envelope"

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/money-grubbing

money-grubbingadjective

uk /ˈmʌn.iˌɡrʌb.ɪŋ/ us /ˈmʌn.iˌɡrʌb.ɪŋ/ disapproving

Someone who is money-grubbing has money as their main interest and does anything possible to get a lot of it.



Around the Network

Console makers are in this to make money, so you're gonna get gouged somewhere as soon as you make the purchase. From extreme markup on accesories, to paying to play online, to abundant microtransactions, there's always an angle. Asking this question is like asking which river is the wettest.



All of these console makers are corporations and they are obligated to their shareholders.

Their main purpose is to get as much profit for their shareholders as possible.

Of course they are trying to get as much revenue and profit from their customers as possible.

If their products are in high demand, they will try to take advantage of tht strong position.

If their products aren't in high demand, they will have to offer better deals.

These corporations are not your friends.

But that doesn't mean that the products and services they offer can't be totally worth their price for you.



Sony had those hugely over priced memory cards for the vita, Nintendo has only now introduced that they would be charging for online after Sony and Microsoft have been doing it for years and we don't even know the price of it yet so really they've still been more affordable for the longest and don't see changing that much tbh. I mean theyre all companies and companies want money, though Nintendo seems to all what to do something different and exciting even though they may know it wont sell as well as generic box like PS4 and Microsoft so that's something I have to appreciate even if it doesn't turn out 100% perfect but what does.



John2290 said:
. Amibo is worse than any DLC or micro transactions. 

That's a blatant lie.



Around the Network

Honestly I'm surprised that MS is getting this much heat. They brought in BC when most said it was impossible. They have been giving away AAA games with their GWG, and they have offered discounts on games months after launch. Heck I even saw Gears of War 4 on sale for 40% off.

Then you factor in Play Anywhere, Xbox One to PC streaming and I don't see how it could be a solid second place.



Mummelmann said:

Amiibo, Pokemon Bank, inferior paid online, pricey hardware with much less kick, crazy prices on controllers and accessories since the dawn of time, full price for 2-3 year old games, forcing consumers to buy their own storage by providing only a tiny amount, claiming rights to revenue from Let's Play videos on youtube, selling a console without a charger/AC adapter, threatening retailers in the 80's and 90's that they won't provide them with any stock if they sell competing products, fake staggering game releases in different regions to force gamers to pay full price everywhere and administer regional price manipulation by undershipping software along with this (they were actually sentenced by the EU for this practice in the 90's), keeping region locks for the longest times to prevent gamers from saving a few bucks on importing games. Forcing handheld gamers to buy two copies of basically the same game if they want to "catch them all", Oh, and forcing developers to pay up front for cartridges and publishing rights on the NES and SNES and then possibly shutting them down by not providing the "seal of approval" or giving them poor reviews in their own magazine (which was by far the greatest source for game reviews at the time).

This isn't a tough choice for me.

Yes, the other two have long shit lists as well, and in various categories and market, but in the gaming circles, there can be only one.

Edit; look at Nintendo's practices in the 80's with pricing on software and hardware, it was a full blow mafia scheme and they all the major retailers in their pocket, it was extremely consumer hostile and produced some crazy, albeit highly unjust, profits for both retailers and Nintendo themselves. Seriously, look it up the next time someone describes Nintendo as the paragon of the gaming industry.

Could not have said it better myself ... 

Amiibo is especially cancer considering it's expensive physical on-disc DLC that get's abused by scalpers on a constant basis since some figures aren't supplied enough. Nintendo is just one step away from becoming the ultimate penny pinchers in the industry and that is adding microtransactions to their AAA games ...

If any console manufacturer money grubber it's absolutely Nintendo since they've profited massively over the years whereas Microsoft and even Sony to a lesser extent struggle to maintain profitability because consumers have higher standards for them all the while Nintendo gets to have a monopoly on the portable console market ... 



L_ said:
Sony had those hugely over priced memory cards for the vita, Nintendo has only now introduced that they would be charging for online after Sony and Microsoft have been doing it for years and we don't even know the price of it yet so really they've still been more affordable for the longest and don't see changing that much tbh. I mean theyre all companies and companies want money, though Nintendo seems to all what to do something different and exciting even though they may know it wont sell as well as generic box like PS4 and Microsoft so that's something I have to appreciate even if it doesn't turn out 100% perfect but what does.

Keep in mind that Sony has always sold harware at a loss. With vita they had to make some of the money back and the memory cards were a way to do that (also they weren't in mass production, so they weren't that cheap for them either). A stupid way, as it showed, but still.

Nintendo not only wants to sell all hardware at a profit instead of waiting to make a profit by selling a single game, but they also never (or hardly ever) drop prices of their games. Their harware are always weak and offer less value for your money. They can offer those "unique" experiences without the consoles or the games costing that much.

Switch prices show they haven't changed a bit. In fact, the only thing that set them apart from Sony and MS (free online) is now gone. Not only that but they are not even willing to give some relatively recent games that could cost them at least some money (and let you keep them for a while). No, they want to spend as little as possible and demand as much as they think they can.

As for Ninty doing something new and exciting, keep in mind that that's the only thing they have left to do. Obvioulsy they can't compete with Sony and MS.



Right now its Nintendo. but generally its microsoft, but this gen they had to change a lot of their grubbiness due to losing badly to Sony.



Goodnightmoon said:
John2290 said:
. Amibo is worse than any DLC or micro transactions. 

That's a blatant lie.

I agree. I dont think many people buy Amiibo for in game content and I dont think Nintendo is keeping much interesting features behind them.

Most of the people who buy Amiibo are older fans who grew up with these franchises and just love having a figurine of their favorite characters.