Quantcast
The Moderator Thread

Forums - Website Topics - The Moderator Thread

I'm confused. I just got a warning for saying that Quickrick could act decent? How is that "mocking" or "doing anything in bad taste"? I didn't even see Amy's warning till after my post.

Around the Network
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
I'm confused. I just got a warning for saying that Quickrick could act decent? How is that "mocking" or "doing anything in bad taste"? I didn't even see Amy's warning till after my post.

Well, it was there. And this topic isn't about Rick so stay on topic. 



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
I'm confused. I just got a warning for saying that Quickrick could act decent? How is that "mocking" or "doing anything in bad taste"? I didn't even see Amy's warning till after my post.

I'm also confused as well, did not see Amy's post until after I clicked submit. Wasn't intentionally trying to break any forum rules. 



axumblade said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
I'm confused. I just got a warning for saying that Quickrick could act decent? How is that "mocking" or "doing anything in bad taste"? I didn't even see Amy's warning till after my post.

Well, it was there. And this topic isn't about Rick so stay on topic. 

The topic WAS about Quickrick. This is the moderator  thread, the topic is regularly about the people who get moderated. Not only that, but Amy's post didn't say "stop talking about Quickrick", it says don't escalate the situation. Escalating is posts that are increasingly bad, usually posts that are there to make fun of banned users. It's not escalating if we're merely talking about a moderation that happened recently, especially if we're saying something positive about the banned member. I don't think moderations should be handed out so liberally even if it's just a warning ... especially when the post didn't tell users to stop talking about Quickrick. Quickrick was the topic, being on topic isn't a synonym for changing the topic. 



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
axumblade said:

Well, it was there. And this topic isn't about Rick so stay on topic. 

The topic WAS about Quickrick. This is the moderator  thread, the topic is regularly about the people who get moderated. Not only that, but Amy's post didn't say "stop talking about Quickrick", it says don't escalate the situation. Escalating is posts that are increasingly bad, usually posts that are there to make fun of banned users. It's not escalating if we're merely talking about a moderation that happened recently, especially if we're saying something positive about the banned member. I don't think moderations should be handed out so liberally even if it's just a warning ... especially when the post didn't tell users to stop talking about Quickrick. Quickrick was the topic, being on topic isn't a synonym for changing the topic. 

Right. There shouldve been more clarification on that,that's on me. But now that there is clarification and you now know, It's time to drop the Quick talk/topic and move on and get back on the topic at hand. 



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

Around the Network
PwerlvlAmy said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

The topic WAS about Quickrick. This is the moderator  thread, the topic is regularly about the people who get moderated. Not only that, but Amy's post didn't say "stop talking about Quickrick", it says don't escalate the situation. Escalating is posts that are increasingly bad, usually posts that are there to make fun of banned users. It's not escalating if we're merely talking about a moderation that happened recently, especially if we're saying something positive about the banned member. I don't think moderations should be handed out so liberally even if it's just a warning ... especially when the post didn't tell users to stop talking about Quickrick. Quickrick was the topic, being on topic isn't a synonym for changing the topic. 

Right. There shouldve been more clarification on that,that's on me. But now that there is clarification and you now know, It's time to drop the Quick talk/topic and move on and get back on the topic at hand. 

That being said, are we able to get our warnings removed since the direction wasn't clear? I have a pretty clean mod history, and kinda bites to receive one on a technicality. If not, I understand



PortisheadBiscuit said:
PwerlvlAmy said:

Right. There shouldve been more clarification on that,that's on me. But now that there is clarification and you now know, It's time to drop the Quick talk/topic and move on and get back on the topic at hand. 

That being said, are we able to get our warnings removed since the direction wasn't clear? I have a pretty clean mod history, and kinda bites to receive one on a technicality. If not, I understand

Yeah this is the only question I have now. That was the only post I was going to make on that topic. I wasn't looking to continually talk about it @Amy. 



axumblade said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
I'm confused. I just got a warning for saying that Quickrick could act decent? How is that "mocking" or "doing anything in bad taste"? I didn't even see Amy's warning till after my post.

Well, it was there. And this topic isn't about Rick so stay on topic. 

This topic isn't supposed to be about sales predictions either but that went on for pages and pages and y'all never did a thing.

A couple of people comment on a banned user, not mock, not celebrate that they've been banned, not really even defend, just comment about him and they get a warning? That's just ridiculous.



⚠️

Alright everyone, we've had several events go down since the origin of my original request to quickrick to get things back on topic. We really need for the thread to get back on track. Let's let the quickrick (and subsequent infractions) be. Should anyone need any further help with it, PM me directly or send us an email. I'd prefer not having to keep handing out any moderations over things in here.

Thanks guys!

                                                                                                                                     

Did somebody say the mods were oversensitive to criticism?

Nah, it's not just criticism. They can't even handle neutral commentary about moderations. Bunch of fucking crybabies

 

 

User moderated - Bristow9091

Last edited by Bristow9091 - 3 days ago