By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kirby007 on 14 May 2018
CGI-Quality said:
kirby007 said:

Thats impossible seeing as that would be available in 2019

Right (it would say 2017 on it). That much should have been obvious. :)

As much as that percieved implied all?



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
forest-spirit on 14 May 2018

That sounds like a good rule.



Aeolus451 on 14 May 2018
CGI-Quality said:
Aeolus451 said:

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015/tables/table-43

I asked for multiple [hence the (s)] and I'd like to see something from 2018.

Plus, being arrested for something doesn't instantly make one guilty of the crime. So it will be an eggshell walk, regardless. So, unless you're someone known to generalize, my point stands. You shouldn't have anything to worry about. 

(s) can mean singular or plural in the way you used it. 😏

The fbi doesn't release data that up to date. It's generally a few years behind. If you look at other years, it's more or less the same. I gave you a very credible source. If you want more data or info, you or something else can google it. I'm trying to watch a dvd from redbox. 😽



Aeolus451 on 14 May 2018
CGI-Quality said:
Aeolus451 said:

(s) can mean singular or plural in the way you used it. 😏

The fbi doesn't release data that up to date. It's generally a few years behind. If you look at other years, it's more or less the same. I gave you a very credible source. If you want more data or info, you or something else can google it. I'm trying to watch a dvd from redbox. 😽

"useful statistic(s)"

That is quite clearly plural. Regardless, keep watching your DVD. I get the guilty conscience, but that can be remedied with ease. ;)

Here, mr. need more sources

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21

 "statistic(s)" can mean either singular or plural. If you absolutely meant plural , you would have written it as statistics. 👿



AngryLittleAlchemist on 15 May 2018

Is there a mass delete function for mods? I just got 200 wall posts of crap : http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/155181/angrylittlealchemist/



Around the Network
Barkley on 15 May 2018
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Is there a mass delete function for mods? I just got 200 wall posts of crap : http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/155181/angrylittlealchemist/

So is this epidemic an angry permabanned user? With the absence of any links you have to assume this spams goal is simply malicious against the site.

Still, no messages for me o/



AngryLittleAlchemist on 15 May 2018
Barkley said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Is there a mass delete function for mods? I just got 200 wall posts of crap : http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/155181/angrylittlealchemist/

So is this epidemic an angry permabanned user? With the absence of any links you have to assume this spams goal is simply malicious against the site.

Still, no messages for me o/

Is he also deficient in height?



Carl on 15 May 2018

Talon's worked on a fix and we now have the tools to completely remove a spam accounts wall posts and PM's.

I'm very tempted to use the new powers on kirby007, so I'm gonna log off for the night before the temptation gets too much.



                            

Azuren on 16 May 2018
CGI-Quality said:
Aeolus451 said:

That's gonna go well if enforced on a regular basis. Let's cut straight to the meat of it. Is the example in the rule the kind of things that is for or is this just something to make it easier to go after certain people?

If you aren't someone who generalizes, you won't have anything to worry about. It's a very easy thing to avoid.

Can we also include generalizations including political spectrum?

 

I'm not pointing fingers in any direction, but I feel like a lot of the negativity in the Politics forum can be solved by not allowing generalization on that basis. For that matter, we should probably also prevent generalizations concerning platform allegiance.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

VGPolyglot on 16 May 2018
Azuren said:
CGI-Quality said:

If you aren't someone who generalizes, you won't have anything to worry about. It's a very easy thing to avoid.

Can we also include generalizations including political spectrum?

 

I'm not pointing fingers in any direction, but I feel like a lot of the negativity in the Politics forum can be solved by not allowing generalization on that basis. For that matter, we should probably also prevent generalizations concerning platform allegiance.

I guess I'll have to be careful with what I say about capitalists then.