Isn't that what species are ? A biological group ? 

Why did you have to say species group then instead of species? Wouldn't that be redundant if that's what you meant?

Look, I have a lot of redundancies built into my posting style (along with ambiguity and open interpretation) but that's not going to change my main issue with you cherry picking my past post only to character assassinate me in the process just to get me potentially moderated if you believed that a hint of my post was in conflict with your ideology ...

I didn't character assassinate you, I merely took your own posts and linked them here.

But you did try to character assassinate me by painting me as a racist by trying to implicate that I thought that different human populations were different species but what's more is that you further made jumps in your logic by cherry picking evidence that I also further implicated that these "human species" were inferior to one another even though my question had made NO comparison whatsoever at ALL ... 

You practically twisted my question into something that it wasn't ... 

You think that people's IQ is dependent on the pigmentation of their skin, isn't that exactly what racism is? Thinking that certain groups are superior/inferior because of their race?

I already told you that my post was a sarcastic joke but you picked up circumstantial evidence to then frame me as a racist and for the most part I don't know what is or isn't superior/inferior yet since I haven't done a rigorous analysis to even make that comparison ... 

Instead what you did was vilify me as definitively proclaiming what was or not superior when I haven't even made a clear stance of that into my question at hand ... 

Do you want me to dig up more of your posts?

Go ahead ... 

OK, I'll see what I can find and post them tomorrow.