Considering the rest of the post was explaiing the statement you didn't understand.. I don't know how to answer you.

Then if you are stating that games will run on Scorpio the same as they run on PC then you clearly don't know what you're talking about. I Didn't want to jump to the conclusion that was what you were saying however.

Unless it can match the price and the games library, the Scorpio will largely sell to existing XB fans which will lead to a initial spike and then a slow decline. The only chance MS have of taking anything from the Scorpio is to change the narrative to it being a 'new generation' and not a 'mid generation update'. The problem with that is MS will have to manage the PR carefully because people will expect Scorpio only titles and that isn't what was promised and one of the main reasons people are happy buying the Slim and not waiting for the Scorpio. I'm already seeing 'BC' being pushed so it's not out of the question that's the route MS will take.

Again. The post was explaining how it works on PC when it comes to more power..   I still dont get why you are confused. 

Hence the example of a games running 1080p on X1 and then 4k on Scorpio. 

I'm expecting "The most powerful console EVER" to own the PS4 Pro in every category. Because if it doesn't....I will sue.

those specs differences aren't really enough to change anything about the actual position of Sony and MS in the gaming market.

But I do hope this is a new start for MS, and that with this new console focused on being a powerful console instead of a kinect machine with "games as a service", they 'll go back to making great games and great new franchises, and bring more third party games and exclusives.

You know, what they were doing for 10 years until Don mattrick screwed things up.

Right I understand what you mean now, I just got confused with how you said it, because I'm not sure who's arguing that it won't get graphical increases. Though I do think the majority of the power will just be utilized for native 4k. Microsofts really going to push for that because it's a marketing tool.

Well isnt that proof? Both Racing sims, both 1st party games pushing there systems to the limits and you agree in saying FM4 looks better.

Give or take both systems are very similar however Xbox can be pushed more with being alot more balanced and easier to develope for and had less bottlenecks.

Like i said before making a system with power with less bottlenecks is a challenge in itself. PS3 was all grunt no control. 360 had both. Cell had overheating problems hence why it was delayed when used to its fullest by devs. (Think of it as a Car with more Traction vs a Car with more Horsepower, which will run the track better? Of course the Car with more Traction) This is why i say the 360 was a more powerful system, because it was more powerful all round.

Ryse was the best looking game for 2 years on release when launched on XB1, that doesnt mean XB1 was more powerful than PS4, thats under the dev and what they wanted to achieve. Sony games always tend to push visuals while Xbox tend to be the other way around, abit like Nintendo who dont focus on visuals yet can make beauitful looking games when they want to eg. Metriod Prime (GC).

Lazy is an excuse. I already stated above comparing 2 similar games both 1st party games and both pushing there hardware to the limits.

Go do some comparing yourself. End of day is many games run better on 360 hardware and even 1st party games in there respected genres favored this.

eg. Forza 4 vs GT5

I wont be commenting anymore on this thread so good luck in trying to convince yourself. I am not turning this thread into a fanwar. 

Here we go again, the console war will never die

Yeah, basically the 900p vs 1080p threads will be swapped to 1800p vs 2160p.

The people in those threads will both change there tunes, some Xbox fans that used to say "Resolution doesn't matter" will now say the opposite, and some PlayStation fans will also change there tune.

Lovely.