The analogy does work. If you're a vegan and voted for Trump, does that make Trump a vegan? You believe in god and voted for Trump, does that make Trump believe in god? There are matters in politics that people vote for or vote against. Your view is somewhat naive, as it's starting out on an assumption that when someone is "bad", he/she is "bad" in everything. If you're a racist, you're speeding too and stealing candy from a store. Pretty much like in kids cartoons a bad guy is bad even in the simpliest things, just for the sake of being bad.

I'm not saying all Trump supporters are racist...I don't think I ever actually said that. All I said was when some supporters think it's okay to say things like they've said and they're backed by a notoriously racist group, it raises questions. The game thing just isn't working man, it just doesn't work in this scenario. If somebody is racist and plays Mario Kart, they like Mario Kart and they happen to be racist. That's all I'm getting from this. How can a game be racist? It doesn't have feelings... the analogy simply doesn't work.

"Didn't hear any racial slurs and hate speech out of Clinton's supporters or campaigns. When a Trump supporter thinks it's okay to shout "Fuck them Niggers" we have to take a closer look at his supporters and their mindsets. Most of them are white males and older mid age to elderly whites that think this kind of language and understanding is normal. I didn't want someone who has supporters who promote and believe these terrible things to be my president."

Both candidates sucked hard. But I would rather have somebody with an inkling on how the world outside works (outside of business, which Trump isn't that good at either truth be told). When Obama won the presidency, we didn't see videos with aftrican americans shaming and shouting racial slurs at caucasians. That didn't happen. But when Trump won we saw NUMEROUS videos about students shouting "BUILD A WALL" around hispanics. That is fucking sick. For people to think that's okay under Trump's victory is VERY scary. It reminds me too much of Hilter's road to power. 

BLM didn't start out as what it is today or what it's precived to be today. It started out of the concern that police officers didn't think their lives mattered as they were swatting unarmed youth like flies with no consequence. Whatever BLM has turned into or was transformed into today is sad, but anger builds up when mothers lose their children unnecessarily and without proper justice. That makes people literally ill. 

I would have voted for Bernie had the DNC not cheated so I don't care what people say about Hillary's campaign, her campaign was just as guilty and sad as Trump's.

I assume by caucasian you mean white people (caucasoid) and not Caucasians, as Caucasian would be Turkish/Iranian/Georgian etc. Yes, you did not see them doing that. And I don't think you'd be seeing it now either, if the Clinton campaign had not been a racist attack against these people. I don't think it's right that innocent people suffer from it, but we'd see the opposite if Clinton had won.

It really doesn't matter what BLM was started as, what matters is what it is today. 

The Clinton rhetorics is much closer to Hitler than what Trumps is.

I think Sanders had won against Trump.

But I never said Trump was racist...Never... nor did I say every trump supporter was racist...never... Like I said, it doesn't work in my scenario.  What I'm getting at is the stuff Trump said during the campaign hadn't been heard of for years in any candidate. When supporters who thought like Trump was speaking heard about him, they came out of the woodwork because of the way he spoke, the way he carried himself.  It reminded them of themselves. I'm obviously referring to the KKK and other WS groups. Bush wasn't supported by the KKK, Clinton wasn't, Bush Sr. wasn't, Regan wasn't, Carter wasn't...need I go on. Why Trump? You know?

The voting percentage was low, so I don't really think Trump was able to wake anyone up, quite the opposite. The elections in a nutshell was people voting against the candidate they saw less bad. That's pretty much all there is. If KKK thought Trump was the better candidate, that's what they did then, it's not like Clinton campaign wasn't a more pr less direct attack against these people. Looks more like the same people that voted Obama, voted for Trump this time.

Well, that's grammar my friend. I should have used a comma or something. I don't think all Trump supporters are racist, a majority of them are caucasian though, a fact that I stated. I guess I also overgeneralized by saying "most". Terrible phrasing on my part. 

And why dont they include sun activity, and the role the sun plays? I mean it is the source of our heat right? But lets forget about that and focus on a non harmful gas that feeds plants. If i'm not mistaken at one point the sarah desert was at one point not a desert, but it is now and that happened before the industrial revolution. who is to blame for that one?

But I never said Trump was racist...Never... nor did I say every trump supporter was racist...never... Like I said, it doesn't work in my scenario.  What I'm getting at is the stuff Trump said during the campaign hadn't been heard of for years in any candidate. When supporters who thought like Trump was speaking heard about him, they came out of the woodwork because of the way he spoke, the way he carried himself.  It reminded them of themselves. I'm obviously referring to the KKK and other WS groups. Bush wasn't supported by the KKK, Clinton wasn't, Bush Sr. wasn't, Regan wasn't, Carter wasn't...need I go on. Why Trump? You know?