Chazore said:
Hapuc12 said:
Of course Ark is a hot mess but i don't worry to much about optimization when games like Gta 5 and Last of Us ran on Ps3 without lag i'm pretty sure it's all about how the game is optimized.
Of course they aren't required but i just find it pointless to put games that aren't patched for Pro and compare them Nothing else.
|
I'd be worried for the game not being optimized for any platform tbh.
I find it pointless when the same is done for PC when it's not been patched proper either.
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
Dont enter them, why attack the OP when he just posted a interview about some dev opinion? If people is all that outraged why not go to www.playark.com/
and complain there in their forums.
|
I'm not "attacking" the OP, I was pointing out like others already have done, on why the OP keeps making said threads. People complain on the Steam forums, where the devs actually talk to their userbase as well.
|
What you done is the very definition of attacking the OP.
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:
Since you aren't a mod and this isn't against the rules people may or may not take your advice and that could envolve several dozen people. On the other side you not entering the thread or nor making the type of posts you are doing would depend only on you, so which is the easiest one for you to control? Yes, I guess so, but you preffer others to stop posting than you to stop fightning, yet you complain of how these threads end up.
Perhaps if you weren't contributing to end the threads on the sore side as you complained they wouldn't end like that.
|
Simply not making a thread to get a rise out of people is a much better solution than telling others to "back fof if they don't like it". YOu know why things can cause a negtaive reaction from others, even yoruself and I know you are a human being who would argue against something that gave you a negative reaction, not everyone is a machine that goes "I'kll just back off, for eevryone's sake, including my own", really not everyone does that 100% of the time, thus the other solution is just as viable.
I'm not the only one pointing out where these kind of threads go, but hey it's easier at the end of the day to make those people out to be far worse than those actually causing negative reactions in the first place. That seems to be the general rule with a few on here.
The sore side?, what?.
|
If you think he is flaming or trolling report him and let the mods do their job. Attacking the OP and saying he is trolling is much more against the forum rules than anything you are saying he is doing.
And you don't need to be a machine. If you see a topic on which you know will take negative feelings from you, you just ignore it or report that is the mature thing to do not the robotic one. There are dozen of PC, Switch and Xbox thread that by the title I know I totally disagree and there were plenty of similarly debunked ones in the past, so I either look for another thread to post or enter that, report it and mention that it was already discussed in the recent past. And you may deny, but you are very frequent on Sony threads and usually being very negative (and again I refer to mod convo that in the forum it's more acceptable "irrational positivism" than "rational negativism" because one of them goes towards trolling and making the forum environment worse).
You are the main one, don't try to hide yourself on the coletivism.
Ending negative = in a sore note = in a sore side. My english may be bad, but I don't think that was impossible to understand.
walsufnir said:
DonFerrari said:
Since you aren't a mod and this isn't against the rules people may or may not take your advice and that could envolve several dozen people. On the other side you not entering the thread or nor making the type of posts you are doing would depend only on you, so which is the easiest one for you to control? Yes, I guess so, but you preffer others to stop posting than you to stop fightning, yet you complain of how these threads end up.
Perhaps if you weren't contributing to end the threads on the sore side as you complained they wouldn't end like that.
I know what an integer is =p . But I was reasonably sure there were talks about single precision being calculated on 16bits integer and double being on 32 bit... and in the end any fraction that isn't irational can be converted on an integer with only the deslocation of the coma.
|
Apparently not. An integer is not a float. Both take up the same amount of bits, though ( a 32-bit integer takes the same amount of "space" like a normal float, single precision: 32 bit).
|
I didn't say an integer is a float. What I said is that mathematically and rational number may be turned into an integer by simply moving the comma, not that computacionally they mean the same.