By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Why Trump supporters stand by debunked claim

Soundwave said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I was with you until the last sentence.

Its actually democrats who are against requiring an ID. https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheet

"Research shows, for example, that more than 21 million Americans do not have government-issued photo identification; a disproportionate number of these Americans are low-income, racial and ethnic minorities, and elderly."

I'm all for government providing an ID free, primarily for the poor. But dems have a long list of BS reasons why we shouldn't.

Dems are against it because Republicans would use that law and saddle it down with costs and try to pile on restrictions on who can have an ID and who can't to try to lock out certain demographics (take a wild guess which one specifically) from getting those IDs. 

Make the IDs free, make them easy to get, and there's no reason why it wouldn't be a boon to Democratic voting blocks. 

While we're at it, I think felons who have served their time being barred from vote is also bullshit. There was a woman for example who wrote a couple of cheques that bounced (she wrote them just before she lost her job assuming she had a paycheque coming) and was convicted. She served her time. But now she can't vote because of her record. 

Millions and millions of black voters are disenfranchised from voting because they have criminal records. If you've served your time IMO you have the right to vote. 

So you're afraid republicans are going to make IDs really expensive and not allow people to have them? Has ever happend with state IDs anywhere in the country?

I support free IDs for the poor and I believe they're already easy to get. Its sad when people think its hard to get an ID. According to dems, their supporters are too fucking stupid to get an ID but we want them voting on important, complex issues anyway.

I can agree criminals should have a right to vote after they've served their time and that's the case in most of the country.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Around the Network
Mr Puggsly said:
bunchanumbers said:

What do you mean lost faith in democrats? Almost all of Obamas presidency was jam packed with republicans voting against his legislation and being proud of it. A majority of governors are republicans. You are acting like it was Obama and liberals running around socializing everything but pretty much the whole time it has been republicans in power. If you have issue with it then that is where you should be looking.

Since I don't like left wing policies in many cases, I'm glad republicans were there to stop him.

I believe things could have been worse.

The Republicans did a lot of things to slow down progress IMO, and Obama was dealt a bad hand to begin with when he first step into office but he played it the best way he could.

Are you glad the republicans shutdown the government because of Obama care?

Here is what happened From October 1 through 16, 2013.

Nearly 800,000 federal employees were out of work without pay.

Nonessential departments and employees were off work.

One man mowed the lawn outside the national monuments.

Veterans was pissed off, did not receive their benefits.

It cost the country $24 billion.


"You don't like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election," Obama said.

  surprise surprise. the republicans did.



CPU: Ryzen 7950X
GPU: MSI 4090 SUPRIM X 24G
Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE
RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 32GB DDR5
SSD: Kingston FURY Renegade 4TB
Gaming Console: PLAYSTATION 5
coolbeans said:
deskpro2k3 said:

Now you're being specific. This is what I think is happening. You use my statement, and added your own pretense. Like I said, you did not thought this through. now that is double facepalm worthy.

Just for fun let me make it less facile:

In order to vote, you have to be registered; in order to register, you have to be a citizen. Your name is then entered with all the information on the poll book, which are kept in the voting poll location at which a citizen is registered to vote.

     An illegal immigrant will have to know the name of a registered voter.

     They'll have to know where the citizen is registered to vote.

     They'll have to know where to sign their name to collect the ballot.

They'll have to know all these things, and even have I.D. and hope that they get there before the valid voter does. That is a hard thing to pull off.

Umm...no more specificity was given from this then my intention from my first comment; all I did was give the most relevant, and standard, definition of 'facile.'  And before you edited the comment, I noticed you mentioned something about "since 'facile' has a couple meanings it was vague" which didn't really make sense to me.  After all, I used a term most synonmous with 'shallow' or 'simplified' so I was kinda confused...which make this little gem quite humorous.  It's easy for you to say I didn't "thought" this through...yet you edited your original comment to where roughly HALF of everything I'm seeing now looks new to me.  I guess we're up to triple facepalm worthy now!

Anyways...

When looking at your new content, your deductive reasoning already fails at its first premise; namely, limiting the idea of fraud ONLY to actions by illegal immigrants.  

 

Do you not see the irony in your own post? I'm not surprised if a lot of things don't make sense to you. Spare yourself from the embarrassment.



CPU: Ryzen 7950X
GPU: MSI 4090 SUPRIM X 24G
Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE
RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 32GB DDR5
SSD: Kingston FURY Renegade 4TB
Gaming Console: PLAYSTATION 5

Oh, it's CNN. Nothing to see here.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Mr Puggsly said:

Mmmhmmm... okay buddy...

I believe a simple state ID should be required for voting. I think that's what the average right winger wants but dems are against it for BS reasons.

So the same party that thinks a state ID for voting is a burden for colored people also thinks we should have a national ID to work? Did you actually read the article, left wing groups hate it.

You're purposefully misunderstanding or you're someone who ignores factors that hamper acquisition of an ID or don't believe they exist because you, personally, aren't affected by them. 

Every time something about voter ID comes up, right wingers make the idiotic comment that "they're against it because they think their constituents are too stupid to get an ID". This isn't an issue of being "too stupid". You only use that to invoke an emotional response in support of your position. 

Just some anecdotal evidence, but I wasn't able to get an ID in Texas at first. Because the documentation I brought wasn't "good enough". I had to have a bill in my name. Imagine a poor person who doesn't have bills in their name, and that's a main requirement for an ID. Also, imagine the closest DMV is 10+ miles away and you have to rely on public transportation. Imagine you work some shitty job that doesn't have flexible scheduling, you work 10-6 and the DMV closes at 5. What about any of that is saying someone is "too stupid"  to get an ID? None of it does and you know it  The process was just so simple for someone like you that you don't see it from someone else's perspective, so you must be "stupid" if they can't follow this "easy" process. Because we live in a vacuum with no outside factors contributing to our diverse daily lives.

For someone like me, who's in a good position currently, those kinds of things don't affect me. I was able to go back home and get the proper documents and go back the next day. But I acknowledge that they affect others. That's why people have IDs other than state IDs, and then Republicans turn around and only say state IDs are valid. That's not a BS reason to be against voter ID laws. Voter ID laws like what Republicans support specifically targets certain demographics and discriminates against them. I literally provided a link showing that Republican leaders were researching breakdowns of groups by race for who has drivers licenses. That they want "specific types of photo ID", so the forms of ID most common amongst minority groups, then, becomes disqualified. 

And yes, I read the article. Hence why I posted it. A national ID would have one set of rules and provisions to obtain them. As opposed to various rules in various states, which, like I said, Republican change things up to make it tougher for minorities to get them. A national ID would absolutely absolve those issues. 



Around the Network

CNN.... I ponder why people still get their news from them.

They're making a news of something that's there been there for ages?

Come on I mean really. How was it that these kinds of people never existed in the first place? Why is this news now?



iron_megalith said:

CNN.... I ponder why people still get their news from them.

They're making a news of something that's there been there for ages?

Come on I mean really. How was it that these kinds of people never existed in the first place? Why is this news now?

Because it's easier to pick on low hanging fruit.



Aura7541 said:
iron_megalith said:

CNN.... I ponder why people still get their news from them.

They're making a news of something that's there been there for ages?

Come on I mean really. How was it that these kinds of people never existed in the first place? Why is this news now?

Because it's easier to pick on low hanging fruit.

Well people who seem to put themselves above from "these" kind of people, ironically fall into the category of being stupid. It's hilarious and hypocritical in a sense.



those of us that research their political viewpoints and want to have policy discussion based on facts when they are present and know the diffenence when they are using opinino/speculation instead of facts are going to be fucking exhausted by the end of 4 years.

there is just no aruguing with someone who can't/won't get informed.

i know stupid is not unique to either side of the spectrum but the difference is that the leader on the left aren't empowering "fake news" by repeating it. with guys like Pense/Ryan more interested in capitolizing on their opportunity to pass their politics then the integrity of their party or the well-being of our country we are pretty much fucked.

today their are only two kinds of republicans: the alt right and the at fault right.



deskpro2k3 said:

Here is how voting works folks, for those that don't know.
You have to be registered in order to vote, and in order to register you must be a citizen.

 

deskpro2k3 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

You dont think illegals are finding ways to vote?

The 3 million figure is unproven and likely false. But you really dont think illegals are voting?

 

let me get back to you later, I need to check what Facebook says.

 

deskpro2k3 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

Fair enough, its evident you believe illegals are voting. That's a valid concern.

The lady just shouldnt have given the 3 million figure.

I didn't give an answer, but lets get serious.

Undocumented immigrants have been allowed to vote in some local elections but for no office higher than town council.  

The only way a person can vote twice or more on the same day is if they do what Ann Coulter did. Register to vote in more than one voting district and don’t get caught.

 

deskpro2k3 said:
coolbeans said:

*Posting a video captioning a reporter facepalming*

*Makes a facile analysis worthy of that same reaction*

Welp...

 

I don't think you've thought this out. Can you be less vague?

Are you trying to say my statement is not true, and If so how do you vote then? Please explain, I'll give you some time to think it over.

 

deskpro2k3 said:
bowserthedog said:

Can you please post a link to where the claim that many non-citizens voted is debunked?  I would find something that proved that to be worth a read.

The people in this video were likely brought on because they were foolish.  They were brought on to make specific claims that they wouldn't be able to do a great job of backing up so that the CNN host could be dumbfounded while also not being in a position to have to provide any real evidence of her own.

 

Well, for starters there is no evidence that proves millions of people voted illegally. Last Saturday there was a recount in Wisconsin, and nothing was amiss.

Ok. Seriously dude. You and a lot of people are making yourselves look bad just like CNN by making fun of a group of people on "their lack of evidence" with nothing but assumptions on the contrary. I was hoping the thread would die down by now, given the source, but seems quite a few people are doubling down on insulting Trump supporters.

So let me tell you'all a few things:

- Many countys on many states use the honor system in order to register voters. In other words all you need to do is put a checkmark on yes to the question of citizenship on the voter registration form. There is no attempt to verify the integrity of the response as long as you give a document saying you are living in the county, such as an electric bill etc.

- You also need a drivers license but:

Note that this map is from 2015. Twelve states and the District of Columbia allow people with no citizenship to get a drivers license.

- Real ID Act (2005):

It made verification of immigration status a requirement for IDs such as the drivers license, but only 24 states and territories follow it. Some of these states alleged to comply but still continued issuing drivers licenses and state ID cards to illegal aliens and non-citizen short-term visitors. 

-Ironically the figure this woman gave is close to one of the estimates made by actual experts on the matter. And I quote:

"Nate Silver, an acclaimed statistician with the forecasting firm Five Thirty Eight, calculated that states with newly implemented voter ID laws will experience turnout decrease by as much as 2.4 percent of the registered voter population.21 Opponents of voter ID laws claim that any decreases in voter turnout are evidence that legal voters have been disenfranchised – discounting the possibility that the reductions are due to decreased participation by non-citizens. But, as Silver has noted, this argument doesn’t make sense because the vast majority of adults in America hold some form of photo identification and states with voter ID laws offer qualifying documentation at minimal or no cost. While it is impossible to prove that Silver’s entire 2.4 percent estimated turnout decrease is entirely attributable to noncitizen voters, it is highly likely that foreign nationals without authorization to vote will constitute the majority of this group. And Silver’s numbers are consistent with the results of other studies more specifically focused on reducing unlawful noncitizen voting. If we take the mean of these three estimates -- 7.25 percent -- and apply it to just the 22 million non-citizen residents currently in the United States, then approximately 1.6 million non-citizens vote every year. According to the high and low estimates here, that number could be as high as 2.9 million (at 13 percent of 22 million), or as low as 528,000 (2.4 percent of 22 million). Both are unacceptably high numbers." - Source.

- Finally, the Wisconsin recount is not over yet, and the vallots themselves can't reflect if an non citizen filled it.

 

So yeah, theres no proof due to relaxed laws, but pretending it doesn't happen? plz.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)