By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo doesn't need to make new IP's, they need to manage their current ones

onionberry said:

He alredy told me that, and I was talking to him. So your reply is useless cause I was arguing with him, not with you.

Sorry but that's not how public forums work, anyone can step in at any time.

But regardless I didn't realise how long ago your post was, as I just came on and noticed your post in one that was quoted with mine. Though you could have apologised for such a hypocritical post and admitted you were wrong.



Around the Network

I would like to see more of Punch-Out!!, Metroid, Kid Icarus and some other older IPs, but does anyone really want a new Duck Hunt, Brain Age, Pilot Wings or Art Of Balance?

I think they should bring back a few older IPs and make new ones.



naruball said:
zorg1000 said:

Well ya Wii U only got a fraction of the Nintendo support 3DS had on top of other obstacles, no Pokemon, Animal Crossing, Fire Emblem, Tomodachi Life, Kid Icarus, Nintendogs, Luigi's Mansion, traditional Kirby, 2D Zelda, Mario & Luigi, Pokemon Mystery Dungeon, Style Savvy, Mario Golf, Fossil Fighters, Chibi Robo, Rhythm Heaven.

You are correct that many people bought multiple 3DS models/special editions but is that any different from other devices? How many people bought the original PS3/360 along with one of their slim models and a special edition? Same with PS4/XBO, how many people bought the original model and bought/plan to buy a slim or pro model? Sure handhelds are more likely to sell multiple units to a single person but the point remains the same.

Your last 3 paragraphs really serve no purpose, the fact that more PS4/XBO games chart, the price of 3DS & number of AAA games a device has are absolutely irrelevent to anything you or I previously said.

Ok, let's not kid outselves here. Are you really comparing number of ps4's that a ps4 owner might get with the number of 3ds's that a 3ds owner ends up buying? I mean, really? Of course it's different. First of all, you can find a 3/2ds even for less than 100 euro. A price that no ps console ever reached Black Friday or not. That kind of price allows you to buy both the green and the blue 3ds you want. Not the same with ps4. How many people upgraded to the XL version? Or to the n3ds version? Look at any thread asking how many devices you've owned and see how many versions of 3ds each user had. Plus, think of the space they take, and how much easier it is for one to break or to get stolen/lost. So, yes it is different.

If you think that the games you listed would have helped wiiu sell significantly more, then I don't know what to say. I seriously can't see anyone going "there are all these great wiiu Mario games, but meh. Oh, there's a Mario and Luigi game? I'm buying a wiiu for sure". I could see, however, people buying a wiiu for a different genre like Splatoon. DIfferent game that satisfies a need people had and was good enough reason (along with the rest of the catalogue) to buy a home console.

As for the last paragraphs, of course they are relevant. I'm not sure you've even serious here. You said Ninty IPs are enough to be a success and sell 80m. My point was that apart from some games selling great, the rest 3ds/wiiu games did not perform well. Instead of selling the almost the same device multiple times to the same person, they need to sell a device to someone who doesn't have it in the first place. So Ninty does need 3rd party games and more IPs to attract an audience. Splatoon attracted an audience and NInty must focus both on New IPs and on better relations with 3rd parties to be competitive again.

My last post said that handhelds have a higher chance of being rebought, we have already established that, but the overall point remains the same, all devices that have revisions and special editions will have people who own multiple units. 

Individually would those games have helped significantly? Probably not, but its the overall library that makes a device a worthwhile purchase, not games in isolation so singling out a title that also happens to be a much smaller franchise than many of the ones i listed is extreme cherry picking.

I never said Nintendo IP alone will make a device sell 80 million, I said they carry alot of weight. I pointed out that this generation Nintendo has sold 80 million units of hardware and of the 400 million units of software that has sold on 3DS/Wii U about 200 million of it is from Nintendo IP so a very large number of those 80m are because of a desire to play Nintendo games.

I dont see how you can seriously say most 3DS/Wii U games dont sell well, They have 7 games that have sold over 10 million, 17 that have sold over 5 million (or will shortly), 25 that have sold over 3 million & 65 that have sold over 1 million.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

KLXVER said:
I would like to see more of Punch-Out!!, Metroid, Kid Icarus and some other older IPs, but does anyone really want a new Duck Hunt, Brain Age, Pilot Wings or Art Of Balance?

I think they should bring back a few older IPs and make new ones.

I would like another Brain Age... xD

Though I think that lends itself to be a mobile title.



Barkley said:
KLXVER said:
I would like to see more of Punch-Out!!, Metroid, Kid Icarus and some other older IPs, but does anyone really want a new Duck Hunt, Brain Age, Pilot Wings or Art Of Balance?

I think they should bring back a few older IPs and make new ones.

I would like another Brain Age... xD

Though I think that lends itself to be a mobile title.

Yeah, it could be big on mobiles I guess.



Around the Network
Barkley said:
onionberry said:

He alredy told me that, and I was talking to him. So your reply is useless cause I was arguing with him, not with you.

Sorry but that's not how public forums work, anyone can step in at any time.

But regardless I didn't realise how long ago your post was, as I just came on and noticed your post in one that was quoted with mine. Though you could have apologised for such a hypocritical post and admitted you were wrong.

I should apologize?, but i wont. Cause his first reply was "what are you smoking, sony has more ips blah blah" so if his first reply was rude, i wont apologize even if he's right, because there are better ways to say that I'm wrong. So if manners are different and not like the real world because this is a public forum and anyone can step in even if they don't have a dog in the fight, then I don't have to apologize if I think that somebody was rude, even if I'm wrong.



KLXVER said:
I would like to see more of Punch-Out!!, Metroid, Kid Icarus and some other older IPs, but does anyone really want a new Duck Hunt, Brain Age, Pilot Wings or Art Of Balance?

I think they should bring back a few older IPs and make new ones.

Given that old school is in right now, a Duck Hunt revival could have the power to pluck at a few heartstrings...

And Pilotwings is a good property to have in their repertoire for the sake of variety...

They could go with the Pilotwings Resort approach and make it a simple content-light series that would work well as inexpensive eShop titles, or they could go with the (slightly) more realistic and substantially more difficult approach of the first two games...

The Wii U was heavy on platformers; they need to show that they are capable of more with the Switch...



Have a nice day...

zorg1000 said:

1. My last post said that handhelds have a higher chance of being rebought, we have already established that, but the overall point remains the same, all devices that have revisions and special editions will have people who own multiple units. 

Individually would those games have helped significantly? Probably not, but its the overall library that makes a device a worthwhile purchase, not games in isolation 2. so singling out a title that also happens to be a much smaller franchise than many of the ones i listed is extreme cherry picking.

I never said Nintendo IP alone will make a device sell 80 million, I said they carry alot of weight. I pointed out that this generation Nintendo has sold 80 million units of hardware and of the 400 million units of software that has sold on 3DS/Wii U about 200 million of it is from Nintendo IP so a very large number of those 80m are because of a desire to play Nintendo games.

I dont see how you can seriously say most 3DS/Wii U games dont sell well, They have 7 games that have sold over 10 million, 17 that have sold over 5 million (or will shortly), 25 that have sold over 3 million & 65 that have sold over 1 million.

1. Again. Saying that "well both have revisions" is clearly downplaying. It's like saying that "Ninty , too, relies on shooters. Look at Splatoon". The difference between unique owners of home console and handheld owners is  siginificant. It is so siginificant that you can't put these two together because you're donwplaying its effect on the total hardware sold of 3ds.

2. I gave an example. Obviosuly I'm not going to analyse each game you mentioned. That's not the only one though. I could have mentioned Luigi's mansion or some of the rest.

3. We all know that some first party games sell extremely well. Most of the rest that come out for them don't sell well at all. Ps4/xb1 constanly have games charting. Ninty every now and then. That wasn't the case with wii and nds which both sold software well.

But honestly, we're just repeating ourselves. If you have anything new to add, you may wanna post it on my wall.



KLXVER said:
but does anyone really want a new Duck Hunt, Brain Age, Pilot Wings or Art Of Balance?

Im sure there are people who want new entries of these series, will they sell millions of copies with full retail prices? Very unlikely, but I think they could do well enough as small, $15 digital only titles.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

naruball said:
zorg1000 said:

1. My last post said that handhelds have a higher chance of being rebought, we have already established that, but the overall point remains the same, all devices that have revisions and special editions will have people who own multiple units. 

Individually would those games have helped significantly? Probably not, but its the overall library that makes a device a worthwhile purchase, not games in isolation 2. so singling out a title that also happens to be a much smaller franchise than many of the ones i listed is extreme cherry picking.

I never said Nintendo IP alone will make a device sell 80 million, I said they carry alot of weight. I pointed out that this generation Nintendo has sold 80 million units of hardware and of the 400 million units of software that has sold on 3DS/Wii U about 200 million of it is from Nintendo IP so a very large number of those 80m are because of a desire to play Nintendo games.

I dont see how you can seriously say most 3DS/Wii U games dont sell well, They have 7 games that have sold over 10 million, 17 that have sold over 5 million (or will shortly), 25 that have sold over 3 million & 65 that have sold over 1 million.

1. Again. Saying that "well both have revisions" is clearly downplaying. It's like saying that "Ninty , too, relies on shooters. Look at Splatoon". The difference between unique owners of home console and handheld owners is  siginificant. It is so siginificant that you can't put these two together because you're donwplaying its effect on the total hardware sold of 3ds.

2. I gave an example. Obviosuly I'm not going to analyse each game you mentioned. That's not the only one though. I could have mentioned Luigi's mansion or some of the rest.

3. We all know that some first party games sell extremely well. Most of the rest that come out for them don't sell well at all. Ps4/xb1 constanly have games charting. Ninty every now and then. That wasn't the case with wii and nds which both sold software well.

But honestly, we're just repeating ourselves. If you have anything new to add, you may wanna post it on my wall.

1. Like I said, I credited handhelds with having a higher chance of being rebought, but neither you or I have any actual data to show the number of unique owners of each device so while you say I'm dowplaying, I could easily say you are overestimating the number of people who own multiple 3DS models and neither one of us would be right because neither of us has any proof.

2. I just find it to be cherry picking when you choose a smaller support title instead of the proven system sellers like Pokemon which sells over 15 million and like I said, its about the overall library not just a game in isolation.

3. Werent you the guy in another thread who was calling people out for using just the top 10 selling games to prove a point? So now a game has to chart in the top 10 of NPD to be considered a strong seller?



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.