Rab said: contestgamer said: Scandinavian countries are among the most effected from muslim immigration, look in to the numbers of rapes commit by north african muslims and you will see it is far disproportional in those scandinavian countries. Watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zT4hgx_S7gc (Hint: Its not just migrants)

That was not what contestgamer was arguing against. His point was that migrants are overrepresented in rape statistics in Scandanavia. How about you share a video that cites actual statistics, like this one?

amp316 said: Nah. Trump's not really a bad guy. He just doesn't like Muslims. Mexicans, black people, women,poor people and the Pope.

 

You mean illegal Mexicans, radical Muslims, black lazy worthless thugs, women who trash talk him, poor people in general who leech off the government, and Pope sucks anyways. Pretty much how a majority of Americans feel.Except for maybe the Pope part. You can't only appeal to the minority all the time. He can't ban Muslims, but he can make it a lot harder to get in legally. Which is how it should be. For all immigrants. If i rob your house, as long as I get home with your stuff I get to keep it right? Illegal is illegal. can't spin it any other way. No matter the circumstances.

Oh my God... No. And, just no.

Seriously, I'm not being disrespectful.  But like, if you honestly don't understand how the government operates or what a President can do in office, then just do some simple research.  Won't take you very much time.

View on YouTube

We shouldn't allow Syrian refugees in this country because they cost way too much to handle. Not to mention that there is legal citizens who are in poverty. Political correctness sucks and only hurts people in the long run.

TheLegendaryWolf said: -BBC "In a speech in Ohio, the candidate outlined his plans to combat Islamic extremism, including a new screening test for arrivals to the US. Applicants will be tested to determine if they share Western liberal values like LGBT and religious tolerance." Link: http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37086578

If this is true, it would also affect Christians.  As an American by birth who is also a Christian, I certainly do not hold western liberal values like LGBT.  My girlfriend, who is a Chinese Christian, currently living here on a work visa, has the same values that I do.  She could be affected by this even though it isn't aimed specifically at Christians.

poklane said: Doubt it. What I think he might do instead is simply block people from certain countries from entering. Iraqis, Syrians, Libyans, Iranians, Egyptians etc. Doubt he'd block Muslims who've been born and raised in Europe from entering the US.

Don't put it past him. He's already pushed his fascist rhetoric to get ahead, he'll likely do it to keep all Muslims from entering the US.

"In a speech in Ohio, the candidate outlined his plans to combat Islamic extremism, including a new screening test for arrivals to the US. Applicants will be tested to determine if they share Western liberal values like LGBT and religious tolerance."

Further evidence he and his supporters are fascists.

CaptainExplosion2 said: poklane said: Doubt it. What I think he might do instead is simply block people from certain countries from entering. Iraqis, Syrians, Libyans, Iranians, Egyptians etc. Doubt he'd block Muslims who've been born and raised in Europe from entering the US. Don't put it past him. He's already pushed his fascist rhetoric to get ahead, he'll likely do it to keep all Muslims from entering the US. "In a speech in Ohio, the candidate outlined his plans to combat Islamic extremism, including a new screening test for arrivals to the US. Applicants will be tested to determine if they share Western liberal values like LGBT and religious tolerance." Further evidence he and his supporters are fascists.

No, the oposite would be fascist. He's making sure that we don't poison our society with the kinds of people that don't our share liberal, western values.

I think it is more rhetoric....

If he for example put stricter restrictions on people immigrating from countries with terrorism issues, I actually think most Americans would be in favour of that .

contestgamer said: DevilRising said: No, actually, the office of the president does not have the power to "ban" one type of person, or religion, certainly not by themselves. There are already laws in place preventing that very sort of thing, and MASSIVE laws would have to be changed to change that. People really need to scale shit back. Yes, a Trump Presidency is an absolute joke and embarassment to the United States, and it IS going to be bad. But people so wound up, thinking it's going to be some Mad Max, Fourth Reich type shit, seriously need to calm the fuck down. Crazy Tea Party clowns were spewing the same kind of crap when Obama got elected, that he was going to take everyone's guns, and enact Martial Law, and throw people in camps, and make Islam the national religion (because yeah, he's totally Muslim guys), etc. etc .etc. Trump talks a lot of shit, and some massive bigots that crawled out of the woodwork bought into it, and helped propel him into the White House (in probably the lowest turn-out election in decades, mind you). But nothing much is really going to change under him, even WITH Republicans temporarily controlling Congress. Why? Because they still don't like his ass. Sounds like what was said about Hitler.

This is what people say when they don't actually have an argument. It's the new "card". Compare your opponent to Hitler when you run out of any options.