Despite that it will noticeable upgrade over Wii U, have on mind that Switch isn't full home console, it hybrid, even more handheld than home console.

I disagree with the Switch spec but we can't really lock it down at the moment so it doesn't really matter. It certainly seems like the worst development kit ever though missing 2 major cpu's and bottlenecked by slow memory. How on earth can that be used to develop games for the Switch of your specification?

The  wii u spec I think is something that is much clearer based on the analysis of the chipworks images at neogaf. There clearly is extra performance there and the wii gpu is clearly used heavily for the gamepad screen but whether its at 11 gflops or 24 gflops as claimed here I don't know.  I was going with the safe view that the wii gpu is only used for generating the gamepad screen at 11 gflops when different to the main image others have said it can be utilised even for the main graphic display and at up to 24 gflops. It does seem strange that they wouldn't be utilised thinking about it again. You'd need to read the thread below and other similar threads to get the full picture. The confirmation of 176 gflops pretty much came from neogaf based on both analysis of the chipworks image and the low power requirements of the wii u. It's not critical but I think 176 gflops is a little unfair to wii u. 

8 shader units with 20 alus in each = 160ALUs @ 550mhz = 176GFLOPs + 24gflops+ of fixed function shaders

Update: sorry I wasn't here to post earlier, the 176gflops is probably correct, since this part does seem to be vliw based. However there is almost certainly at minimum Hollywood inside this die as well considering how Wii u handles backwards compatibility. @550mhz that would give Hollywood 24gflops. Fixed functions are far better at doing their job than programmable shaders, but can do little else. It is more capable than 360, but it is impossible to really compare beyond that.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=511628

Cant wait for what the Nintendo games would look like on the switch! Especially those exclusive to the handheld or console games that didn't come to the Wii U!

Great news for both console and handheld Nintendo fans!

Why isn't the PS4pro in this table? Its coming out in a few days and all its specs are known.

Also, I don't know what your preferences are; but are you a Nintendo fan? I ask cause there seems to be a Nintendo slant to this table of yours..... If there wasn't i wouldn't be asking the question.

Great work non the less though.

Guess that explains it; completely  ommitted the PS4pro even tho it's coming in 4 days and stands to be a 4k gaming option that's likely to be no more than $100-$150 more than an NS. Didn't mention the XB1s which is a direct replacement of the XB1 he listed and boasts a couple of different specs and features. Especially when you consider that at the time the NX is released, anyone buying an XB1 will be getting the XB1s. And in the other section he conveniently left out OS wide features from the other systems that does or allows things the NS doesn't (eg. remote play and share play, 4k Blu-ray playback, VR support).

Ah well.... better than nothing I guess. 

 I guess, but I feel like most people are going to look into it for it's home console aspect. Anything it can do as a portable, iPads have been able to do for years. That's not really a good look tbh

From console aspect it will be around 3x more stronger than Wii U, so difference will be definitely noticeable compared to Wii U, saying that Nintendo games on Wii U already looked great.

Good job doing this table.

I just want to remind everyone that, when trying to figure out performance, is not as simple as counting Cores and core's speeds, because we have different arquitectures.  PowerPC, ARM and x86 do not perform the same even when they have the same amount of cores and the same speed.  Heck, even when you have an Intel and an AMD processors with the same amount of cores and the same speed, they will not have the same performance.

And the same goes for the GPU.

Earlier in the thread I remarked that I didn't put the PS4Pro or the Scorpio because the table becomes hard to read the more consoles you add and having them in this table with NS and WiiU seems pointless as they are both far more powerful than anything in this table now. I did hint that if anyone wants to follow my format for simple cross-talk, they could make a thread that focuses on the four consoles from MSony with a link back to this one.

As for a slant in the OP, I'm not attempting to be biased. The OP goal is to just list out the most up-to-date data and let the reader draw their own conclusions. Can you highlight what you see as a slant in favor of Nintendo?

- XBOs, yeah I can see the arguement here of dropping XBO and adding S. I should also do same for PS4Slim as that is also the base unit now.
- I do have bluray listed for the other devices and specially state no video media playback in both Nintendo consoles.
- I do mention Vita connectivity (aka remote play)
- 4K video playback is actually in all of those consoles but WiiU. 4kBluray would be part of the XBOs if I listed it.

"How on earth can that be used to develop games for the Switch of your specification?"

I don't think the dev kit rumor was as accurate as what is in my OP. I think the actual dev kits are basically what you'd see in the OP with likely more RAM, etc.

RE: WiiU flops, yeah that thread is why I stuck with the 176 number. That is what seems to be more accurate if the point of the OP is to allow comparisons to other consoles as directly as possible. What is used to put a display on the gamepad seems non-essential to comparing the raw power of WiiU to other consoles IMO.