By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Rumor: New Wipeout for Playstation 4 at Playstation Experience 2016?

I'd certainly be interested in a new Wipeout, especially if it's VR compatible.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Around the Network

No buy if VR!



 

Nem said:
Zoombael said:

 

Man, where do you guys come up with these cringeworthy comments.

 

Some one digit paged thread tells us if VR is the future or not?

 

I wouldnt say VR is "the future". But certainly it will play a big part in the near future. Who says otherwise doesnt know whats going on in the world and is confined to the boundaries of... some internet forum and its couple of pages long threads.

lol... sure. Or some can't see what is in front of them and why the products can't ever go mainstream.

So, yeah... let's see. I have done this dance many times. Don't forget to disappear aswell when the obvious sinks in. It's the usual modus operandi.

Can't see what's in front? Are you talking about this thread? I can see you dancing around your fixed point of view.

The products? Do you yourself know what you're talking?

Newsflash: VR already is mainstream. I don't even need to include the release of PSVR. Sonys efforts play a big part no doubt. However, it isn't enough by far and not a key factor. I'm kinda able to emphasize with people like you. Ironically i myself am a little startled on how fast it is happening. I'm surprised because the tech is still basic, not advanced as it's supposed to be. Still, it is getting there with great speed.

I repeat, you have no notion of what is going on outside of the confines of this thread/forum. You said it yourself.

"Look at this thread. VR is obviously not the future."

This is hilarious. Imagining, telling dem analysts to "Look at the four pages of this thread!" and their reaction "OMG, your so rite, VR is not ze futur!".

ahh... funny... xD

*Ahem..

 

 

http://www.economist.com/news/business/21708715-china-leads-world-adoption-virtual-reality-insanely-virtual

http://qz.com/766128/photos-chinas-booming-virtual-reality-arcades-bring-the-niche-technology-of-vr-to-the-masses/

Of course china doesn't stand alone. All over the world VR is on the advance. May it be virtual reality escape room in Zurich, or VR fitness in the town i live - i happen to know of because it was on the local radio station. So local you can't find the location on the internet. And now even Microsoft is advertising their Scorpio - which arrives at the end of next year *hint* - with Virtual Reality. 

 

Some naysayers on an internet forum isn't a good indicator. The links i provided and twenty seconds of this video on the other hand are excellent indicators why VR is thriving and why it will have a bright future.

3:27-3:45

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anoUQz_erbk

Yes yes, i'm certain you know it better, although you know nothing and all your naysay is based on a feeling in your gut.



Hunting Season is done...

Be cool but no VR. Fast Racing Neo was great and would like to play more modern future racers.



Zoombael said:
Nem said:

lol... sure. Or some can't see what is in front of them and why the products can't ever go mainstream.

So, yeah... let's see. I have done this dance many times. Don't forget to disappear aswell when the obvious sinks in. It's the usual modus operandi.

Can't see what's in front? Are you talking about this thread? I can see you dancing around your fixed point of view.

The products? Do you yourself know what you're talking?

Newsflash: VR already is mainstream. I don't even need to include the release of PSVR. Sonys efforts play a big part no doubt. However, it isn't enough by far and not a key factor. I'm kinda able to emphasize with people like you. Ironically i myself am a little startled on how fast it is happening. I'm surprised because the tech is still basic, not advanced as it's supposed to be. Still, it is getting there with great speed.

I repeat, you have no notion of what is going on outside of the confines of this thread/forum. You said it yourself.

"Look at this thread. VR is obviously not the future."

This is hilarious. Imagining, telling dem analysts to "Look at the four pages of this thread!" and their reaction "OMG, your so rite, VR is not ze futur!".

ahh... funny... xD

*Ahem..

 

 

http://www.economist.com/news/business/21708715-china-leads-world-adoption-virtual-reality-insanely-virtual

http://qz.com/766128/photos-chinas-booming-virtual-reality-arcades-bring-the-niche-technology-of-vr-to-the-masses/

Of course china doesn't stand alone. All over the world VR is on the advance. May it be virtual reality escape room in Zurich, or VR fitness in the town i live - i happen to know of because it was on the local radio station. So local you can't find the location on the internet. And now even Microsoft is advertising their Scorpio - which arrives at the end of next year *hint* - with Virtual Reality. 

 

Some naysayers on an internet forum isn't a good indicator. The links i provided and twenty seconds of this video on the other hand are excellent indicators why VR is thriving and why it will have a bright future.

3:27-3:45

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anoUQz_erbk

Yes yes, i'm certain you know it better, although you know nothing and all your naysay is based on a feeling in your gut.

Love how you try to retreat into VR as a terapeutic tool. I don't believe that is gaming. :D

There is no gut feeling. Theres examples from the past and why Straping a screen to your face for a long time is not an enjoyable experience. Not to meantion as a game device it is limited aswell in the controls department. But, im not worried at all. This has no chance to win not only due to these factors but the fact no one is gonna invest heavily on a 3m userbase or less.



Around the Network
Nem said:
Zoombael said:

Can't see what's in front? Are you talking about this thread? I can see you dancing around your fixed point of view.

The products? Do you yourself know what you're talking?

Newsflash: VR already is mainstream. I don't even need to include the release of PSVR. Sonys efforts play a big part no doubt. However, it isn't enough by far and not a key factor. I'm kinda able to emphasize with people like you. Ironically i myself am a little startled on how fast it is happening. I'm surprised because the tech is still basic, not advanced as it's supposed to be. Still, it is getting there with great speed.

I repeat, you have no notion of what is going on outside of the confines of this thread/forum. You said it yourself.

"Look at this thread. VR is obviously not the future."

This is hilarious. Imagining, telling dem analysts to "Look at the four pages of this thread!" and their reaction "OMG, your so rite, VR is not ze futur!".

ahh... funny... xD

*Ahem..

 

 

http://www.economist.com/news/business/21708715-china-leads-world-adoption-virtual-reality-insanely-virtual

http://qz.com/766128/photos-chinas-booming-virtual-reality-arcades-bring-the-niche-technology-of-vr-to-the-masses/

Of course china doesn't stand alone. All over the world VR is on the advance. May it be virtual reality escape room in Zurich, or VR fitness in the town i live - i happen to know of because it was on the local radio station. So local you can't find the location on the internet. And now even Microsoft is advertising their Scorpio - which arrives at the end of next year *hint* - with Virtual Reality. 

 

Some naysayers on an internet forum isn't a good indicator. The links i provided and twenty seconds of this video on the other hand are excellent indicators why VR is thriving and why it will have a bright future.

3:27-3:45

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anoUQz_erbk

Yes yes, i'm certain you know it better, although you know nothing and all your naysay is based on a feeling in your gut.

Love how you try to retreat into VR as a terapeutic tool. I don't believe that is gaming. :D

There is no gut feeling. Theres examples from the past and why Straping a screen to your face for a long time is not an enjoyable experience. Not to meantion as a game device it is limited aswell in the controls department. But, im not worried at all. This has no chance to win not only due to these factors but the fact no one is gonna invest heavily on a 3m userbase or less.

"Love how you try to retreat into VR as a terapeutic tool."

Where do i do that?

I provided a youtube video and additionally a time frame.

3:27-3:45

Even in case i did what you insinuate incorrectly: Retreating? The numerous applications of Virtual Reality is what makes it succeed with speed. Are you really this inable to comprehend how big investments are generated? The video wasn't ment as an example for how useful VR is in a specific sector, but pointing out how the technology has the lucrative virtue of cutting costs tremendously and that goes beyond healthcare. In fact, if you'd know better, VR isn't new to the field of therapy. And i'm not solely referring to a driving simulator as seen in the clip and similar contraptions.

https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/vrpain/

What is new is the price tag, as mentioned in the video. Since costs are lowered to a fraction and technology has advanced, and is advancing with unprecedented speed, other industries (Sports, Travel, Entertainment, Real Estate, P***, Education etc.) are investing. Investing heavily. Userbase of 3m? lmfao. More like 3b.

Wait a sec. Doesn't my previous post contain more than a lonely youtube clip? Mh, naah. Must be my wild imagination.

"The big-name financial investors included Fidelity, Intel Capital, Softbank, Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, Sequoia, DCM, Qualcomm Ventures, Raine, CITIC, and more. The roster of corporate investors joining the fun added Amazon, Alibaba and News Corp., Merel said. So while specialist AR/VR VCs drove the early investment market, growing confidence and check sizes have led to an acceleration in the number of mainstream investors, he said."

http://www.zdnet.com/article/virtual-and-augmented-reality-systems-poised-for-growth-spurt/

 

"Theres examples from the past and why Straping a screen to your face for a long time is not an enjoyable experience."

In 90s the first flat screen TVs emerged. They were expensive as hell compared to todays hardware and understandably not very common. According to your logic, HD panels we find now in the majority of households had no chance of succeeding over CRT TVs and computer monitors, because they hadn't been mainstream in the past. What you personally think of "straping a screen to your face" is irrelvant. What is relevant: Millions are already doing it and enjoying themselves. And this is happening although the HMDs of today are relatively crude.

And i lol at how you cautiously won't go into detail and elobarate these examples of the past, supposedly illustrating how VR is doomed to fail. If you have done this dance so many times, just copypasta. Or did you already do that? It feels like it. Ya ya, the usual bovine and outdated arguments.

 

"Not to meantion as a game device it is limited aswell in the controls department. "

It is? But of course. Now that you've explained in minicule detail, the obvious has jumped into my face. Just kidding (in case it has eluded you). In the contrary. There are no limits. Even with the limited tech we have now it is possible to play games with complex control schemes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgc_EHa6TaU

Limited? Driving in VR gives an advantage over conventional 2D flat screen racing, since it feels more natural and your view isn't "limited" to a corridor.

Furthermore: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be-MJxeCpvU

 

Now continue to prance around your confined corridor-o-vision viewpoint of the past.



Hunting Season is done...