By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - A vote for Trump is indefensible

Nem on 13 October 2016
lionpetercarmoo said:
Nem said:

4. You are making up assumptions about Hillary.

5. Trump's aren't assumptions. They are facts, spoken by himself in front of everyone.

6. See reason.

 


 

You blind?

Err... did he say that was his position? He declared the fliow chart of how a vote for Trump becomes defensible.

I added to it on how it should come around if those people used logic.

Yup, i don't see an "I", so i'm definitly not blind.



Around the Network
Soundwave on 13 October 2016
MaxFairplay said:
WagnerPaiva said:

A vote for Trump is a vote for peace, for the end of Globalism and for the rebuild of US. I hope he wins, Hillary wants war, she is evil, she hates people, she thinks she is better than everyone and she threats common folk like dirt.
A vote for Hillary brings the Third World War. She does has the SJW support because they want a freak in office, but they do not know better.

I tend to agree with this. Trump certainly a safer bet for us little guys. 

lol, this type of thinking always make me laugh. 

I'm lucky enough to be part of the 1% because of family wealth. My family worked hard for that, but I acknowledge I am lucky. 

But you have "average joes" who vote against their own interest to give rich people like me tax breaks, it's just incredible how the Republican party runs this con on average people. 

Trump wants to drop taxes on the rich (which will balloon the deficet because military and social security and medicaid and basic social services still need to be paid for) and deregulate so corporations can basically bend every rule. He isn't opposed to Wall Street, he is a walking Wall Street mascot.

And they sucker the "common man" into thinking this is good for him, honestly I've been around rich businessmen who laugh about this paradox. "Poor" people are easy to sucker they say. I used to disagree with them, but honestly I don't think so anymore. 

Sanders was the only candidate for the "average joe" in this cycle, but Clinton is far closer to Sanders' policies than Trump is, this "they're the same becuz one time Hilary gave a speech to Wall Street" is another laughable joke. Their policies are very different, Trump's policies are the same ones that have destroyed the middle class in America (starting largely with Reagan). 



jason1637 on 13 October 2016
SuaveSocialist said:
jason1637 said:

OP- People want different things and as far as i known the two main candidates bring different policies/ideas to the table. It's pretty defendable is someone wants one person's policies over the other. 

Unless one set of policies is indefensible---such as Trump's.  

If you've read the OP, you'll see that Trump has no polices (read the list of every-changing and contradictory policies he's proposed).  He's called them only "suggestions".  Spoiler alert: they're indefensible--in the illegal, unConstitutional, suicidally expensive, self-defeating, unprecedentedly stupid or simply insane varieties.  If you don't believe me, read the Master Post.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions

Those look like policies. As far as i cqn tell non of them are unconstitutional. 



SuaveSocialist on 13 October 2016
jason1637 said:
SuaveSocialist said:

Unless one set of policies is indefensible---such as Trump's.  

If you've read the OP, you'll see that Trump has no polices (read the list of every-changing and contradictory policies he's proposed).  He's called them only "suggestions".  Spoiler alert: they're indefensible--in the illegal, unConstitutional, suicidally expensive, self-defeating, unprecedentedly stupid or simply insane varieties.  If you don't believe me, read the Master Post.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions

Those look like policies. As far as i cqn tell non of them are unconstitutional. 

They do not look like policies (he's gone on record too many times offering irreconcilably contradictory ones).  They are "suggestions" --Trump.  And they do look suicidally expensive, self-defeating, unprecedently stupid and simply insane.  Indefensible.  The Master Post explains why.  Have you read the OP?



danasider on 13 October 2016
WagnerPaiva said:
That is the beauty of democracy: people do not have to defend their votes. They will go vote in the candidate they want in power and there is nothing anyone can do to prevent them.
If anything, I encourage everyone that say that they will vote for Hillary to keep saying it and then vote for Trump anyways.
The beauty of democracy is that loud minorities do not matter, only majority consensus.

If you know how the electoral college works, that's not really the truth.



Around the Network
avrwc2 on 13 October 2016

Here's an irremediably deplorable who voted for Obama back in 2008 and will enthusiastically vote for Trump this time.

Oh, it would be so sweet if he filled up the prisons with the Clintons and their lapdogs and bitches, creepy Neocons, DoubbleCrap's torturers and whatever other scum festers in and around DC. Of course, it's not likely to happen, he'll be dead before the first grand jury was enpaneled but hope is ethernal.



danasider on 13 October 2016
DarkD said:
I'm quite happy with Trump, not as a president, but as the leader of the republican party. He is single-handedly destroying the entire republican party on every level. On a year they pretty much had a win in the basket and every level of government was at their beck and call.

To think that a single person could be so incompetent that he destroys such a powerhouse as the republican party. There are incompetent business men, and then there's Donald Trump. It's not even news that he's a horrible business man. This is the guy who brought down America's second football league (Yes the states used to have TWO football leagues until Trump.) Trump didn't even own it, he just owned a team, but convinced all the investors that they should compete directly with the other football league....

It's simply amazing what this man is capable of... Republicans, you need to keep supporting this man, no matter how many elections is costs you. He's the chosen one that will lead you all to whatever glorious fates you think await you in the end. :D C'mon, clearly you only lost because of Paul Ryan that no good backstabber. Oust the man and put Trump in his place!!!

Lol, I love this comment. I never thought of it that way, but now that you say it, Trump 2020!



ohmylanta1003 on 14 October 2016

I've decided that because of this post, I'm voting Trump.



I bet the Wii U would sell more than 15M LTD by the end of 2015. He bet it would sell less. I lost.

Qwark on 14 October 2016
Mystro-Sama said:
Qwark said:

That moment when a vote for DeezNUTZ is more defensible than a vote for either the Republican nominee or the Democratic nominee. Can't Barrack Obama stay president for four more years. Hell I would love to see Michelle take the office, a white woman leader is nothing to brag about in the Western world. A black woman on the other hand would be a first ever. Anyway not voting or voting for a candidate that isn't Hillary or Trump is best defendable.

There are black women leaders in the west. In fact, one ran my country and fucked the economy into the ground. When will the woman hype die?

Out of curiosity which country are we talking about. With Western world I mean Australia, New Zealand, US, Canada, EU and Switzerland + Norway



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Majin-Tenshinhan on 14 October 2016

Well, the username checks out.

For the record, I'm not American so I don't get to vote, but I'd like to avoid World War 3 so I'd vote Trump 100%. Clinton is a warmonger, openly, and we WILL see WW3 if she's elected. I'd rather not live through a world war. But keep hating Trump because he said mean things, and keep acting as if it's democratic to tell everyone else how they're not allowed to vote.