By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Video: Bill Clinton accuser Juanita Broaddrick relives brutal rapes.

Azuren said:
Soundwave said:

As oppposed to conservatives who are then I take it by your logic "pro-rape"?

If she has a case, go to court. Prove it. 

Like the people who are suing Trump for Trump University fraud are doing. 

But alas, at the end of the day Bill Clinton is not running for election here, Trump is, which is a problem for him. 

Liberals would likely have you believe that.

 

I don't think you understand how threat and coercion work. 

 

Trump's not threatening any of them, so they can safely do so. 

 

No, Bill's wife who covered up his rapes, lost military lives, and compromised national security several times is. 

Prove it, again Hillary apparently has done everything according to her detractors, I suppose if someone one the street said she murdered a 5 year old, you'd jump on that with zero proof. 

We don't need to stretch to attack Trump because he's dumb enough to give ample ammuniation for that virtually every second week he does something stupid that would've ended the political career of most anyone else and this time he probably fucked himself too hard, and his supporters are now in massive damage control. 

Military lives are lost under every single secretary of state, under every president. That's the reality of the world, soliders die, embassies are attacked. The world isn't sunshine and lollipops everywhere. Trump wouldn't know anything about this, because he's never served in any position that made him responsible for the well being of soldiers (and for that we should probably be thankful). 

She did not set up her email server properly. And she has apologized for that, to me logically the politican should not be the one in charge of this to begin with. It should be some tech nerd who makes sure it's all set up and run properly, this should not be a requirement to run for office, it has nothing to do with policy or person's character. 



Around the Network
Normchacho said:
Do Trump supporters really want to go down this rabbit hole?

http://uproxx.com/news/judge-orders-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/

Who?



l <---- Do you mean this glitch Gribble?  If not, I'll keep looking.  

 

 

 

 

I am on the other side of my sig....am I warm or cold?  

Marco....

So we have a moron who takes the liberties which come with being rich and famous to the extreme. Which is not illegal until someone charges you and you are found guilty if I might add. This counts for Trump as well as Bill as it does for Hillary. The other choice is pretty much the corporate labrador of Wall Street, which gives speaches for ungodly amounts of money for Wall Street and yet claims not to be influenced by Wall Street. Even though historical data shows you can buy political influence in the US and only the opinion of the rich civilians care. Good luck choosing your poison US, I would still choose the latter. But only because the first shouldn't become a president, for way better reason than bragging in a bus though.

https://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=%23&ved=0ahUKEwjd97e_kM7PAhXLaRQKHW4eC-gQxa8BCB8wAg&usg=AFQjCNF1sHlk2z9QIx28jtvfnGP_UlkifA&sig2=jlEIM3EPKmlMTsBcmsWwrw



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Soundwave said:
Azuren said:

Liberals would likely have you believe that.

 

I don't think you understand how threat and coercion work. 

 

Trump's not threatening any of them, so they can safely do so. 

 

No, Bill's wife who covered up his rapes, lost military lives, and compromised national security several times is. 

Prove it, again Hillary apparently has done everything according to her detractors, I suppose if someone one the street said she murdered a 5 year old, you'd jump on that with zero proof. 

We don't need to stretch to attack Trump because he's dumb enough to give ample ammuniation for that virtually every second week he does something stupid that would've ended the political career of most anyone else and this time he probably fucked himself too hard, and his supporters are now in massive damage control. 

Military lives are lost under every single secretary of state, under every president. That's the reality of the world, soliders die, embassies are attacked. The world isn't sunshine and lollipops everywhere. Trump wouldn't know anything about this, because he's never served in any position that made him responsible for the well being of soldiers (and for that we should probably be thankful). 

She did not set up her email server properly. And she has apologized for that, to me logically the politican should not be the one in charge of this to begin with. It should be some tech nerd who makes sure it's all set up and run properly, this should not be a requirement to run for office, it has nothing to do with policy or person's character. 

I can't even talk to you about this, can I? Deflect, deny, deflect, deny. You're a typical party voter; you don't even care, you just want Democrats to win over Republicans. You don't care that both seem to have no issue with rape, or that both have lost millions of dollars, or that both are completely incapable of running a country. As long as Blue Team wins, right? 



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Azuren said:
Soundwave said:

Funny we've had 5 threads pretty much since the Trump tape leaked trying to deflect from his controversey, especially after Trump backers spent all of last week hyping up a Wikileakers "leak" (never mind a foreign dictator state like Russia is trying to interject into a foreign countries election, that doesn't raise any red flags) that turned out to be a bust. 

We've also had countless threads about Hillary being an awful choice, in which you participated in all of them by downplaying the things she's done. 

 

And now you're here, downplaying her involvement in this. Aren't liberals supposed to be against rape? 

Most Americans in general believe in "innocent until proven guilty."  Even if you do no believe in that, you're going to have a hard time getting intelligent people to switch over to "guilty until proven innocent."  At the very least, you're going to have to present much better arguments then simply repeating accusations over and over as if they were fact.



Around the Network
pokoko said:
Azuren said:

We've also had countless threads about Hillary being an awful choice, in which you participated in all of them by downplaying the things she's done. 

 

And now you're here, downplaying her involvement in this. Aren't liberals supposed to be against rape? 

Most Americans in general believe in "innocent until proven guilty."  Even if you do no believe in that, you're going to have a hard time getting intelligent people to switch over to "guilty until proven innocent."  At the very least, you're going to have to present much better arguments then simply repeating accusations over and over as if they were fact.

Okay, you're right. This woman is clearly a liar, only here to tear down Hillary. She wasn't raped, she wasn't menaced, and those are crocodile tears. Similarly, any woman who says she was raped is automatically a liar as well until proven in a court of law.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

pokoko said:
I've got to say, Trump is really stepping up his campaign against Bill Clinton. Someone should mention that he's running against someone else, though.

I LOLed.



Azuren said:
pokoko said:

Most Americans in general believe in "innocent until proven guilty."  Even if you do no believe in that, you're going to have a hard time getting intelligent people to switch over to "guilty until proven innocent."  At the very least, you're going to have to present much better arguments then simply repeating accusations over and over as if they were fact.

Okay, you're right. This woman is clearly a liar, only here to tear down Hillary. She wasn't raped, she wasn't menaced, and those are crocodile tears. Similarly, any woman who says she was raped is automatically a liar as well until proven in a court of law.

This is one of the most ignorant posts I've ever seen in my life.

Do you really, honestly not understand why this country is built on the idea of "innocent until proven guilty"?  Are you sure you want guilt to be determined by who is the most convincing?  

That last line, though, that's just idiotic and it's offense that you're shoving horse shit like that over fucking politics.  Take your strawman bullshit arguments and peddle them to someone else.



Normchacho said:
Azuren said:
It's pretty hypocritical for the Hillary supporters to come out and defend this, I might add. But they will, of course, deflect and ignore. Pay no attention to the monster that covered up numerous rapes, that got soldiers killed for no reason, or that compromised national security on several occasions.

No, pay attention to how awful of a person Trump is. Never mind that they're both equally horrible.

No, they aren't. To suggest so is clear ignorance.

I freaking, love John Oliver. He tells it straight up.



Azuren said:
pokoko said:

Most Americans in general believe in "innocent until proven guilty."  Even if you do no believe in that, you're going to have a hard time getting intelligent people to switch over to "guilty until proven innocent."  At the very least, you're going to have to present much better arguments then simply repeating accusations over and over as if they were fact.

Okay, you're right. This woman is clearly a liar, only here to tear down Hillary. She wasn't raped, she wasn't menaced, and those are crocodile tears. Similarly, any woman who says she was raped is automatically a liar as well until proven in a court of law.

What would you suggest? Witch trials? Having children tell adults which ones are guilty like the Salem days? Maybe Straight up lynchings because a black dude looks at a white woman the wrong way?

You can't just assume a dude is guilty. A recording of a woman crying stirs emotions and overreactions of people all the time. She could say anyone did something with tears in her eyes and people will react. This video is just playing on that, and you fell for it.